Priority Feature...

Status
Not open for further replies.

JoeBearcat

Active Member
Uniden Representative
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
2,585
I was hoping that there was a conventional Priority feature,

There is. It works pretty much the same as any other radio's priority feature.
The same is true for the Motorola trunking priority.

The P25 priority is a little 'off' - it's priority TG selection rather than priority TG monitoring. I am hoping to be able to correct that in the future.
 

rbritton1201

Captain1201
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
407
Reaction score
81
Hi Joe,

Yeah, wouldn't you know that the Missouri Highway Patrol is on a P25 Trunking System...and they're one of the agencies I would like to prioritize, along with the analog signals from the local Sheriff's Department on VHF.

There is. It works pretty much the same as any other radio's priority feature.
The same is true for the Motorola trunking priority.

The P25 priority is a little 'off' - it's priority TG selection rather than priority TG monitoring. I am hoping to be able to correct that in the future.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,858
Reaction score
16,115
Location
BEE00
No.

The precedence would depend on the direction the scanner is scannIng.
The point is that scanning priority pecedence or preference depends on the scanning direction.

I'm sure you know that now.👍
Wrong.

Conventional priority (when multiple channels are flagged as priority capable) assigns precedence in the order in which the channels are arranged/programmed. Scan direction has no bearing on priority.

A very simple test for anyone who wants to prove this out: Program a few busy channels into a single department. Order them so that the most important channel is first in the list, followed by a few more channels. Set the first channel as priority, then set one of the other channels as priority as well. Enable Priority Scan, then start scanning in the up ↑ direction.

Observe as the scanner stops on a non-priority channel and will start to sample for priority (the dropouts in audio you hear). If you wait long enough, the channel further down the list will go active ("secondary" priority), causing the scanner to leave a non-priority channel. If you wait longer still, you'll probably catch the first channel in the list ("primary" priority) preempt the "secondary" priority channel.

Pay very close attention to the fact that when the scanner stops on the secondary priority channel, it continues to sample for activity on the primary priority channel, however when it lands on the primary priority channel, sampling stops. This is a key piece of info.

Now reverse the scan direction ↓ and observe that the behavior is exactly the same as it was in the other direction. The first channel in the list is still primary priority, and the other channel still secondary priority. The precedence of those channels did not change simply by reversing scan direction.

I scan FDNY this way with Bronx as the primary priority (first channel in the list) and Manhattan as the secondary priority (third channel in the list), and it works exactly as I described regardless of which direction the 536HP is scanning.
 

ofd8001

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
8,413
Reaction score
1,543
Location
Louisville, KY
How does it work without QK’s? I don’t use QK’s.

It would be based on order of channels loaded into the scanner's operating memory. If you recall, when you first power up the scanner, you see "Now Loading... Load from Favorites List" or something like that. This is the process where all your channels, etc. are loaded into the scanner.
 

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
3,187
Reaction score
992
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
Wrong.

Conventional priority (when multiple channels are flagged as priority capable) assigns precedence in the order in which the channels are arranged/programmed. Scan direction has no bearing on priority.

A very simple test for anyone who wants to prove this out: Program a few busy channels into a single department. Order them so that the most important channel is first in the list, followed by a few more channels. Set the first channel as priority, then set one of the other channels as priority as well. Enable Priority Scan, then start scanning in the up ↑ direction.

Observe as the scanner stops on a non-priority channel and will start to sample for priority (the dropouts in audio you hear). If you wait long enough, the channel further down the list will go active ("secondary" priority), causing the scanner to leave a non-priority channel. If you wait longer still, you'll probably catch the first channel in the list ("primary" priority) preempt the "secondary" priority channel.

Pay very close attention to the fact that when the scanner stops on the secondary priority channel, it continues to sample for activity on the primary priority channel, however when it lands on the primary priority channel, sampling stops. This is a key piece of info.

Now reverse the scan direction ↓ and observe that the behavior is exactly the same as it was in the other direction. The first channel in the list is still primary priority, and the other channel still secondary priority. The precedence of those channels did not change simply by reversing scan direction.

I scan FDNY this way with Bronx as the primary priority (first channel in the list) and Manhattan as the secondary priority (third channel in the list), and it works exactly as I described regardless of which direction the 536HP is scanning.
Good to know. Thank you for the clarification regarding what happens to the priority of more than one priority channel if you reverse the direction of scanning?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top