RayAir
Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Messages
- 1,968
- Reaction score
- 182
It's probably false considering every security and privacy statement they made on their website is misleading.POCLink says "higher network priority than regular phones, our radios stay online when smartphones drop out". Is there any truth to this?
I saw a couple of the RR units on the floor of an ambulance last month. I swear they felt like mockups.
I don't think "most" is accurate, at least not the cheapo subscriber units. We know Falck went to NXDN. What about AMR? Who else is big?
They will be receiving a vulnerability disclosure letter soon.
Their radios do have sensitive receivers though. In rural areas I had a better signal on the radio than on my smartphone. So maybe they meant you have a better chance of getting a signal? They do claim access to multiple provider's networks.
As far as having higher priority over other network users goes, no, that's laughable.
I looked at a few PoC providers and would avoid PocLink, Global PTT, and Rapid Radios. Avoid any Chinese PoC radio. Hytera Horizon was meh. Motorola Wave seemed to be the only business/consumer grade solution doing it right. But they are one of the most expensive.
Haloid Solutions pointed out some of the risks with these Chinese PoC companies a year ago. I couldn't find any evidence that anyone else looked into them.
If you want to research these devices yourself, for starters I'd suggest downloading their APKs and going through them with JADX. If you have the radios, install the PTT app on your phone then connect to a mobile hotspot on another computer running Wireshark and start capturing your own traffic.
Just wanted to spread some awareness. I was mislead by PocLink's claims.