real quick and simple question

Status
Not open for further replies.

reconrider8

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
2,901
Reaction score
394
Location
Eastern, NC
i have a bct-15 and i use the encoder to play my scanner over my computer its the windows media encoder
 

fineshot1

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
2,531
Reaction score
21
Location
NJ USA (Republic of NJ)
i have a bct-15 and i use the encoder to play my scanner over my computer its the windows media encoder

OK - I am not expert in that area but I would think that would also depend on the cpu and architecture of your pc. what are the specifics of the pc you are using(ie: cpu speed, front side bus speed, hd access speed, etc. etc. etc....).
 

Skypilot007

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
2,596
Reaction score
530
Location
Medford, NJ
I don't think your computer has much too do with it. That delay is completely normal for windows media encoder. I've run it on both my computers, 1 is an pentium III 1GHz processor 512meg ram and the other is a pentium dual core 3.4 GHz 2 gig ram. I saw no difference in the lag time between the two computers. Of course the dual core machine can handle media encoder better as it is a system resource hog to say the least. Most of the encoders I tried before settling with simplecast have a similar delay. I don't think it can be tweaked in anyway to make the delay shorter. I couldn't find anything in there to tweak the lag time.
 

matthewtomek

Live Audio Admin
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
756
Reaction score
1
Location
Memphis, TN
na its my feed but i dont want to host my scanner i just want to listen to MY scanner threw my comp


If you're not looking to host a scanner feed, just take MS Encoder out of the mix. Plug your scanner into your Line-In jack and unmute it. You'll hear the audio through your computer speakers.
 

Skypilot007

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
2,596
Reaction score
530
Location
Medford, NJ
In the system volume settings you can unmute the line in or mic, which ever you are using and then it will come out the speakers with no delay. I'm using icecast so I'll have to look in the configuration for that delay time.
 

nexus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2002
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
1
Location
Mississippi
Simple answer.... ICECAST with an m3u file. Their feed is more like 1 to 2 seconds delay from the actual transmission.
 

rdale

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 3, 2001
Messages
11,380
Reaction score
6
Location
Lansing, MI
That's much more complicated than plugging the scanner in to the computer and unmuteing...
 

Livewire3286

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
209
Reaction score
1
Location
Montesano, Wa
why not just turn it on then, and turn up the volume on the scanner?
Doesnt sound like this is a streaming question at all
 

kpoe_28

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Location
Kennett Missouri
I don't think your computer has much too do with it. That delay is completely normal for windows media encoder. I've run it on both my computers, 1 is an pentium III 1GHz processor 512meg ram and the other is a pentium dual core 3.4 GHz 2 gig ram. I saw no difference in the lag time between the two computers. Of course the dual core machine can handle media encoder better as it is a system resource hog to say the least. Most of the encoders I tried before settling with simplecast have a similar delay. I don't think it can be tweaked in anyway to make the delay shorter. I couldn't find anything in there to tweak the lag time.
I run mine through Shoutcast and through Gordons Icecast server. The Shoutcast has about a 30sec. delay running it at Bitrate:24kbps but if I up it to say 32 or 48kbps it shortens the delay down alot but it uses more bandwidth. Now with Gordons Icecast server, I'm sending him 16kbps and it only has a 10 sec. delay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top