really confused

Status
Not open for further replies.

gator

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
227
Location
Mitchell,SD
hi just writing to find out who is in charge of the radioreference South Dakota list?
I would like to know where and how he or she come up with the talkgroups for Yankton County because I live here and have never seen them and listen to fire and emt stuff all the time .Just writing to see if I was missing something
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Location
Katy, TX
gator said:
hi just writing to find out who is in charge of the radioreference South Dakota list?
I would like to know where and how he or she come up with the talkgroups for Yankton County because I live here and have never seen them and listen to fire and emt stuff all the time .Just writing to see if I was missing something
Hello Monty,

You will probably recoginze my name from other groups that you belong to and to explain what happened, we seem to be under attack here. Fake data was submitted to the TRS DB for inclusion and when it was spotted by me, removed. There is no one person responsible for the SD portion of the DB here, but I have asked the other administrators to hold off on posting updates until I see them. Hopefully this will stop the nonesense that seems to exist with a certain group of individuals in South Dakota, whose mission seems to be obfuscation of information about the state's TRS. I know that you have run into at least one of them claiming that his "master list" shows how wrong the data here is. Remember, the data in the RR.com DB comes from the users. Not from some master list, so although it might have errors, those errors are mostly from simple mistakes, as opposed to downright bad data being submitted.

As of the present time, there is only one Yankton Co. TG listed and that is Yankton Co. Law which was supplied by a user in Yankton. The Engineering TG mentiond in the Misc. section of TG's seems to be part of a state agency, not sure if DOT or IT or what, so that is why it is where it is. The frequency data for sites with numbers below 200 is accurate as to site number and actual frequencies to the best of our knowledge and is based on actual Trunker runs and information supplied. Of course there may be frequencies missing, but at least the CC data is correct as of the date it was submitted.

Since you are where you are, you of course can be helpful by monitoring what you can and letting us know what you can find out. :) As I said before, that is how this DB is maintained.

Thanks for the interest. 8)
 

gator

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
227
Location
Mitchell,SD
Got your meesage Lou ,
It looks like everthing is pretty update and correct on the sd rr site .By the way just thought i would let you know we have emailed before if you dont know me .I posted some info about charles mix county on our secret yahoo forom if your are looking for some info
thanks
a fellow scannernut
Monty H
 

tyytor

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
367
Location
Wyoming
hey lou i submitted 2 verified SD system sites with frequencies verified and who ever updated it?? put them with 100 site numbers
and also left the 200 numbers, the sites are 33 stickney and 6 billsburg
the frequencies are right, also just to let you know that there are 45 sites
the only ones that i can't find are 37 and 44,
thanks
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Location
Katy, TX
tyytor said:
hey lou i submitted 2 verified SD system sites with frequencies verified with trunker and who ever updated it?? put them with 100 site numbers
and also left the 200 numbers, the sites are 33 stickney and 6 billsburg
the frequencies are right, also just to let you know that there are 45 sites
the only ones that i can't find are 37 and 44,
thanks
tyytor, you have a PM and an email from me. I need you to address them. They will explain what is happening. I have been waiting 2 days for an answer. Thanks. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top