Scanner Tales: Obsolete Accessories

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
5,934
Location
Far NW Valley
In prior Tales I have mentioned such obsolete tech like the OptoElectronics Scout and OptoScan. These tools, while still useful these days for some purposes have pretty much been made obsolete by newer scanners and accessories that have included the features they were useful for. For example, the Scout, especially when combined with a compatible scanner like the equally obsolete AR8000, would detect a strong transmission and display the resulting hit and send the connected radio tot hat channel so you could listen in. For $600 or so plus about as much for the radio one could have a cool near-field receiver. These days you can get the same experience from a sub-$200 BC125AT scanner with CloseCall.

Maybe “Obsolete” isn’t the right word; “Redundant” might be better. The features are still useful but the need for a specialized accessory isn’t as that has been included into newer radios and devices.

Let’s take a trip back a few years or decades and revisit some of the neatest tools us old farts used to use to accomplish what the younger generation takes for granted.

“Nitelogger”
The NiteLogger was a radio-tape recorder interface that would turn on and off a standard cassette recorder (another obsolete technology) when scanner traffic occurred. There were a couple versions, the original and an improved NiteLogger II. Both versions had a similar premise; connect it between a scanner and tape recorded and the device would detect audio and activate the connected tape recorder. It also had a speaker with a volume control so one could hear the audio live as the radio’s speaker would be disconnected as the NiteLogger plugged into the external speaker or earphone jack.

I had a couple of the first version, but never had a NiteLogger II. As far as I knew the NiteLogger II only differed in case style and replaced the relay with a newer version. This ran for about $50 in the early 2000’s, probably around $100 in today’s money.

The NiteLogger did not include a tape recorder, one used a standard cassette recorder. In the day, cassette recorders came with a dual jack, a “Mini” audio jack for the mic and a “Sub-mini” labeled “Remote”. This is what made the NiteLogger work. It took the scanner audio, and thru an audio circuit converted the 4–16-ohm speaker level audio to the 600-ohm impedance used by tape recorder mic inputs. With a VOX circuit it used a relay to close the Remote jack’s contacts to activate the recorder. It came with an audio cable to plug into the scanner external speaker or earphone jack and a dual cable to the recorder. You connected it up and used the NiteLogger’s level control to adjust the audio properly. You then set the recorder to “Record” (Remembering to press both he Play and Record buttons!) and went to bed. When you woke up the tape would be full of all the activity from overnight with no dead air.

Sometimes I would set up the NiteLogger on my work channel and when I got home from work, I would play back my evening to see how my voice sounded over the radio. I know a guy who for years recorded the Illinois police Aid channel (ISPERN, 155.475) with one of these all the time. A couple of us played a trick on him one night and made a fake broadcast using a radio that would transmit in the sub-milliwatt range, basically you had to be within 20 or 30 feet to hear it. We “broadcast” a fake message about his car being stolen and pursued. We did another call later about a manhunt in his neighborhood and when he asked if we had heard about it we denied all knowledge.

M6000, M7000 and M8000 Data Decoders:
The Infotech M7000 data decoder was the pinnacle of RTTY, WeFax and other data mode decoding back in the 1980’s. This ran for upwards of $1000 dollars then, which is like almost $3000 today. There were older versions like the M6000 and rigs from other companies but the M7000 was the top of the line. Connected to the record jack of a stable HF receiver and you could decode and view all kinds of data services on a CRT monitor or your trusty Apple Image Writer. I had 3 of these over the years, one bought from a friend and another traded for some radios. The third I bought at a hamfest 2 years ago for $25 but it didn’t work so I gave it away.

When I had my first one, I paired it with my Panasonic RF-4900 HF radio. The Panasonic was much more stable than the R71A or my IC-735, especially once you warmed the thing up by leaving it on overnight. I would set up on a RTTY frequency and come home to a stack of paper with news and weather reports, aviation messages etc.

Eventually the M7000 was supplanted by the M8000, I had one for a while but by then had moved on to different interests so it didn’t last long. Supposedly it could decode the early mobile data terminals of the 1990’s but I never tried that then.

These days one would use a free computer program and an SDR to perform the same tasks but in those days, we didn’t have that luxury. If you were hard-core or had more money than brains this is what you did.

Police Call and Scanner Master Frequency Directories
Before the days of Radio Reference and the rest of the Internet scanner hobbyists used our own version of the phonebook to find scanner frequencies or figure out what that new station I heard was. Paper guides were the only way to go since it was all we had.

Police Call, edited by Gene Costin and later Rich Barnett, was the granddaddy of scanner guides. It was more than a data dump, but that is what it was based upon. Gene added channel numbers and notes to many frequencies listed, most sent in by readers. The most prolific of us would be sent copies of the complete 9-volume set as thanks for the info provided.

Scanner Master started out by producing highly detailed scanner guides. This took the concept to an art form with maps, charts and channel guides. A nationwide guide called “Monitor America” detailed the state police, highway patrol and metro area channels for the entire country. Local guides like the Illinois Communications Guide (which I edited) and others had hyper-detailed listings for the coverage area.

Soon enough however the Internet came along and ruined things for producers of paper guides. While a good thing for hobbyists and professionals alike those of us that produced guides on processed dead trees had to figure some other was to monetize our hobby. Radio Reference eventually made the paper guidebooks obsolete as one could look up the information for free on their website via a computer, tablet or cellphone.

CSI CD-1 PL/DPL/DTMF Decoders (as other similar devices)
Back in the day scanners did not have instantaneous PL and DPL decoding like we have now. If you wanted to decode PL codes, you would have to program a PL capable radio with all of the PL’s and scroll thru them manually until you found the right one. This could be tedious at best. One of my friends who was seriously into PL codes would program a BC760XLT (The first commonly available scanner with PL tones) with the optional PL deck with all 38 of the standard PL codes and scan thru them to find the active one. He wore out the button labels on his scanner but by then had the layout memorized so it really didn’t matter.

Another method was by using a frequency counter that would read the lower-than-audible tones. This required some sort of interface circuit to a scanner and if you knew how to do it could be effective but not always really accurate.

Enter CSI and OptoElectronics! CSI introduced the CD-1 Decoder and around the same time Opto had the DC440. Each of these would connect to a discriminator jack and instantly decode and display the active PL code. They also decoded DPL codes (something the BC760 could not) as well as DTMF (“Touchtone” ©). These boxes were awesome for the advanced hobbyist as they would instantly display the active tone live. I preferred the less expensive CD-1 (as well as its successor CD-2) as the bid red LED display could be viewed across the room. The DC440 had a much smaller LCD display but had more features like recall memory.

There were other devices we used at the time. The Zetron Model 8 Repeater Programmer was a large device that had a huge LED display. While intended of course as a repeater programmer and timekeeper it decoded and displayed PL, DPL and DTMF codes. If connected to a transceiver it could also send those codes along with other types of things like 5-tone. Several of us had these but most of us replaced them with the smaller and easier to mount CD-1.

I still have one of my 4 CD-1’s. Back in the day I had one connected to a scanner in the car, two at home and one in my office at work. They were awesome!

TV-R7000 Adapter:
If you had an Icom R-7000 back in the day you could get one of these add-on devices that bolted to the side of the radio. It would allow one to then receive TV video along with the audio (which the R7000 could already do). You would connect it to a monitor via a composite video connector and watch TV with your $2000 radio. Sure beats watching on a $200 TV!

Seriously though it was actually a useful device. It could allow one to view Amateur TV and view DX signals when conditions were up. I had one on a couple of my R7000’s over the years and even used it occasionally.

AOR ARD-25
I honestly don’t know why these things were as wildly popular as they were back in the mid 2000’s. I was working the Scanner Master booth at the Dayton Hamvention in the Hara Arena soon after the ARD-25 was introduced. We had a couple dozen of them and were worried we would have to ship most of them back after the fest. The first day we sold our entire stock of them and had reservations for many more. We were able to get a new stock overnighted to us at the hotel due to some friendly connections with AOR and sold the entire batch Saturday.

The ARD-25 was an accessory to connected to a high-end receiver like the R7000, AOR R8600 or similar rigs with a 10.7 MHz. IF output. It would then allow that receiver to tune P25 conventional signals.

Basically, it was a $300 device that connected to a $2000 receiver that allowed it to do some of what a $400 scanner would do better. It did not work on trunking, and that constituted 90% of P25 usage then and now. While it wasn’t a thing then it would not do Phase II P25 (TDMA). Paul Opitz and I discussed this phenomenon in the booth that year and neither of us could figure out why they were flying off the shelves. We also sold BCD996T scanners that did everything the ARD25 could do at a fraction of the overall cost.

I guess it was another case of “too much money, not enough brain”.

Dataslicers:
A dataslicer was a device that converted audio signals to a level readable by a computer serial port. This would allow you to decode various forms of over-the-air data like RTTY or pagers. It could also decode the old 9600 baud Mobile Data Terminals popular with police, fire, taxicabs and others in the 1980’s thru the 2000’s before most of these went to commercial or encrypted services.

The Dataslicer is what got Bill Cheek in trouble 25 years ago. He sold some of these and got arrested as he advertised that they could decode the current MDTs in use at the time. While the case was never adjudicated due to Bill’s subsequent death, it appeared to have had the “Streisand Effect”, making it more visible and thus desired.

While one could buy dataslicers commercially at the time the “2-Level” version was simple to make out of RadioShack components. I made several of these for my own use as well as for friends. If you did it right, you could fit it all in the shell of a DB-9 connector. There was also a more complicated 4-Level dataslicer that worked on newer data modes. The one I had was commercially made.

Most of the interesting stuff one would use a dataslicer for, like MDT’s or pagers, have switched to newer modes and encryption. Back in the day however they, along with free software found on the Internet, made for some really interesting intercepts!

Conclusion:
These were just a few of the accessories may of us back in the day used to further our obsession with all things radio. I am sure that many of you had these and others so please comment below on what you used.
 

ofd8001

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
8,071
Location
Louisville, KY
Ahh. . . The days of waiting for the latest edition of Police Call to come out!

Never knew this existed until long ago I stopped by the Electra "factory" in Indianapolis to pick up some crystals for a trip farther north. The helpful person pulled out their copy of Police Call just to be sure I got the proper ones. No telling how many versions of that I ended up with.

It must have been a very tedious data entry system to maintain that before computers became so prolific.
 

footage

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 20, 2004
Messages
321
Location
Pacific Rim
I wrote the first Monitor America, assisted by Daria Malinchak. It was a bear. I received kind favors from many in the monitoring field, spoke with many public safety communications personnel (some helpful, others not), combed FCC records nationwide (all on fiche) and even got some IRAC printouts. Rich Barnett, my publisher, was an outstanding person to work with, but I would never do something like this again.
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
5,934
Location
Far NW Valley
I wrote the first Monitor America, assisted by Daria Malinchak. It was a bear. I received kind favors from many in the monitoring field, spoke with many public safety communications personnel (some helpful, others not), combed FCC records nationwide (all on fiche) and even got some IRAC printouts. Rich Barnett, my publisher, was an outstanding person to work with, but I would never do something like this again.
I helped in the second edition with Illinois of course and several others. I then did a lot of work on the 3rd and final edition.
Yep, a ton of work but satisfying in the end!
Reminds me about another accessory I had: a Fiche Reader. Time to add another chapter!
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
5,934
Location
Far NW Valley
Well, I guess I have to add a "Part 4"! A commenter reminded me of another accessory I had that is obsolete: a microfiche reader.

Before the FCC files were put online they were available at local FCC offices on microfiche. These were plastic sheets, roughly 3x5, that had hundreds of pages of data each in microscopic print. The "Fiche Reader" was a fancy magnifying glass with a screen. You placed the card in the movable tray, switched on the light and moved the tray around until you found what you were looking for.

Thankfully these were pretty standard in the 60's thru the 90's, they could be found in police stations for looking up license plates, newspapers for looking up old issues, libraries, and pretty much anywhere that archives were accessed. In Salt Lake City the LDS libraries had them for genealogical data (important for Mormon beliefs). While some readers used rolls instead of cards some of the readers accommodated both.

When I was a kid I would sometimes go to the police station with Dad. He would come back with a list of license plates and I would look them up on the Fiche reader and he would then take the results back out and write them tickets for no village vehicle license. I would be paid with a stop at Dairy Queen or Dog N' Suds on the way home.

We had one at the police station when I was a young dispatcher. Even though by then we had access on a terminal (It wasn't a computer, just a dumb terminal) the microfiche was useful if you had a partial plate number, you could then look for the proper page and look at similar license plates.

I was able to get my hands on a microfiche reader that was trashed by another local police station. At the time the FCC office nearby would give me the last month's copies of the fiche files after they got their new ones. This allowed me to search the files to my heart's content in the comfort of my own apartment. When I was holed up with the flu for a week I kept busy looking for stuff, better than watching TV!

Eventually the usefulness of my personal fiche reader wore out and I gave it to a friend, along with stacks of old FCC files.
 

MiCon

Mike
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
164
Location
central AZ
Back in the 1960's I had an commercial antenna splitter that, unfortunately, I can't remember who made it. I think it was made to be used in the car. It used a Motorola input from the antenna, and had four Motorola outputs. Motorola was the scanner antenna connection of choice at that time. The four outputs were for: VHF low (30~50), VHF high (151~174), UHF (450~512), and I think, the FM broadcast band (88~108). At that time there wasn't anything being used above 512Mhz except for microwave.

I'm not a tech, but I think each output jack used a (diode?) that would take what was coming in from the antenna, and limit the frequency range to what the output was labeled for. It worked quite well, but over time the use of Motorola plugs on scanners moved to BNC. And as most scanners became wide band, the use of a particular frequency range for reception became moot.
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
5,934
Location
Far NW Valley
Back in the 1960's I had an commercial antenna splitter that, unfortunately, I can't remember who made it. I think it was made to be used in the car. It used a Motorola input from the antenna, and had four Motorola outputs. Motorola was the scanner antenna connection of choice at that time. The four outputs were for: VHF low (30~50), VHF high (151~174), UHF (450~512), and I think, the FM broadcast band (88~108). At that time there wasn't anything being used above 512Mhz except for microwave.

I'm not a tech, but I think each output jack used a (diode?) that would take what was coming in from the antenna, and limit the frequency range to what the output was labeled for. It worked quite well, but over time the use of Motorola plugs on scanners moved to BNC. And as most scanners became wide band, the use of a particular frequency range for reception became moot.
I think I remember the splitter you mentioned. It had a metal box roughly the size of a 35mm film container's box (remember that?). Some hade a female pigtail for the antenna and 3 male pigtails (for the radios), others I have seen had 4 jacks and you used male to male jumpers for the radios.

I imagine they were very similar to a TV splitter in theory and construction; provide isolation and as little loss as possible without an amp.
 

MiCon

Mike
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
164
Location
central AZ
I think I remember the splitter you mentioned. It had a metal box roughly the size of a 35mm film container's box (remember that?). Some hade a female pigtail for the antenna and 3 male pigtails (for the radios), others I have seen had 4 jacks and you used male to male jumpers for the radios.

I imagine they were very similar to a TV splitter in theory and construction; provide isolation and as little loss as possible without an amp.
You know how you hang onto something for a life time, then realize you'll never find a need for and throw it way? Then three months later you realize you should have held on to it? That's what happened here. I still had it in a junk box in the garage 1-1/2 years ago. When I moved last year I tossed it away. Now I wish I had at least taken a photo of it, but it never occurred to me that it would come up in a conversation. BTW, it WAS made for mobile use. I remember it had an L-bracket on each side so it could be mounted under the dash panel. And if it will help your memory any, the box case was grey but the face plate was blue.
 

mark40

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
285
Location
Pike County, Pennsylvania
Remember the excitement of getting the BC760XLT deck and like your friend, programming all 38 PL codes into a bank. Tedious but rewarding to do that kind of sleuthing. That and the OptoElectronics device to get long sought frequencies for an Air National Guard installation. Back then was contributing to Scanner Master regularly and it was satisfying to have such info to contribute.
 

rf_patriot200

Active Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Messages
625
Location
Freeport, Illinois
In prior Tales I have mentioned such obsolete tech like the OptoElectronics Scout and OptoScan. These tools, while still useful these days for some purposes have pretty much been made obsolete by newer scanners and accessories that have included the features they were useful for. For example, the Scout, especially when combined with a compatible scanner like the equally obsolete AR8000, would detect a strong transmission and display the resulting hit and send the connected radio tot hat channel so you could listen in. For $600 or so plus about as much for the radio one could have a cool near-field receiver. These days you can get the same experience from a sub-$200 BC125AT scanner with CloseCall.

Maybe “Obsolete” isn’t the right word; “Redundant” might be better. The features are still useful but the need for a specialized accessory isn’t as that has been included into newer radios and devices.

Let’s take a trip back a few years or decades and revisit some of the neatest tools us old farts used to use to accomplish what the younger generation takes for granted.

“Nitelogger”
The NiteLogger was a radio-tape recorder interface that would turn on and off a standard cassette recorder (another obsolete technology) when scanner traffic occurred. There were a couple versions, the original and an improved NiteLogger II. Both versions had a similar premise; connect it between a scanner and tape recorded and the device would detect audio and activate the connected tape recorder. It also had a speaker with a volume control so one could hear the audio live as the radio’s speaker would be disconnected as the NiteLogger plugged into the external speaker or earphone jack.

I had a couple of the first version, but never had a NiteLogger II. As far as I knew the NiteLogger II only differed in case style and replaced the relay with a newer version. This ran for about $50 in the early 2000’s, probably around $100 in today’s money.

The NiteLogger did not include a tape recorder, one used a standard cassette recorder. In the day, cassette recorders came with a dual jack, a “Mini” audio jack for the mic and a “Sub-mini” labeled “Remote”. This is what made the NiteLogger work. It took the scanner audio, and thru an audio circuit converted the 4–16-ohm speaker level audio to the 600-ohm impedance used by tape recorder mic inputs. With a VOX circuit it used a relay to close the Remote jack’s contacts to activate the recorder. It came with an audio cable to plug into the scanner external speaker or earphone jack and a dual cable to the recorder. You connected it up and used the NiteLogger’s level control to adjust the audio properly. You then set the recorder to “Record” (Remembering to press both he Play and Record buttons!) and went to bed. When you woke up the tape would be full of all the activity from overnight with no dead air.

Sometimes I would set up the NiteLogger on my work channel and when I got home from work, I would play back my evening to see how my voice sounded over the radio. I know a guy who for years recorded the Illinois police Aid channel (ISPERN, 155.475) with one of these all the time. A couple of us played a trick on him one night and made a fake broadcast using a radio that would transmit in the sub-milliwatt range, basically you had to be within 20 or 30 feet to hear it. We “broadcast” a fake message about his car being stolen and pursued. We did another call later about a manhunt in his neighborhood and when he asked if we had heard about it we denied all knowledge.

M6000, M7000 and M8000 Data Decoders:
The Infotech M7000 data decoder was the pinnacle of RTTY, WeFax and other data mode decoding back in the 1980’s. This ran for upwards of $1000 dollars then, which is like almost $3000 today. There were older versions like the M6000 and rigs from other companies but the M7000 was the top of the line. Connected to the record jack of a stable HF receiver and you could decode and view all kinds of data services on a CRT monitor or your trusty Apple Image Writer. I had 3 of these over the years, one bought from a friend and another traded for some radios. The third I bought at a hamfest 2 years ago for $25 but it didn’t work so I gave it away.

When I had my first one, I paired it with my Panasonic RF-4900 HF radio. The Panasonic was much more stable than the R71A or my IC-735, especially once you warmed the thing up by leaving it on overnight. I would set up on a RTTY frequency and come home to a stack of paper with news and weather reports, aviation messages etc.

Eventually the M7000 was supplanted by the M8000, I had one for a while but by then had moved on to different interests so it didn’t last long. Supposedly it could decode the early mobile data terminals of the 1990’s but I never tried that then.

These days one would use a free computer program and an SDR to perform the same tasks but in those days, we didn’t have that luxury. If you were hard-core or had more money than brains this is what you did.

Police Call and Scanner Master Frequency Directories
Before the days of Radio Reference and the rest of the Internet scanner hobbyists used our own version of the phonebook to find scanner frequencies or figure out what that new station I heard was. Paper guides were the only way to go since it was all we had.

Police Call, edited by Gene Costin and later Rich Barnett, was the granddaddy of scanner guides. It was more than a data dump, but that is what it was based upon. Gene added channel numbers and notes to many frequencies listed, most sent in by readers. The most prolific of us would be sent copies of the complete 9-volume set as thanks for the info provided.

Scanner Master started out by producing highly detailed scanner guides. This took the concept to an art form with maps, charts and channel guides. A nationwide guide called “Monitor America” detailed the state police, highway patrol and metro area channels for the entire country. Local guides like the Illinois Communications Guide (which I edited) and others had hyper-detailed listings for the coverage area.

Soon enough however the Internet came along and ruined things for producers of paper guides. While a good thing for hobbyists and professionals alike those of us that produced guides on processed dead trees had to figure some other was to monetize our hobby. Radio Reference eventually made the paper guidebooks obsolete as one could look up the information for free on their website via a computer, tablet or cellphone.

CSI CD-1 PL/DPL/DTMF Decoders (as other similar devices)
Back in the day scanners did not have instantaneous PL and DPL decoding like we have now. If you wanted to decode PL codes, you would have to program a PL capable radio with all of the PL’s and scroll thru them manually until you found the right one. This could be tedious at best. One of my friends who was seriously into PL codes would program a BC760XLT (The first commonly available scanner with PL tones) with the optional PL deck with all 38 of the standard PL codes and scan thru them to find the active one. He wore out the button labels on his scanner but by then had the layout memorized so it really didn’t matter.

Another method was by using a frequency counter that would read the lower-than-audible tones. This required some sort of interface circuit to a scanner and if you knew how to do it could be effective but not always really accurate.

Enter CSI and OptoElectronics! CSI introduced the CD-1 Decoder and around the same time Opto had the DC440. Each of these would connect to a discriminator jack and instantly decode and display the active PL code. They also decoded DPL codes (something the BC760 could not) as well as DTMF (“Touchtone” ©). These boxes were awesome for the advanced hobbyist as they would instantly display the active tone live. I preferred the less expensive CD-1 (as well as its successor CD-2) as the bid red LED display could be viewed across the room. The DC440 had a much smaller LCD display but had more features like recall memory.

There were other devices we used at the time. The Zetron Model 8 Repeater Programmer was a large device that had a huge LED display. While intended of course as a repeater programmer and timekeeper it decoded and displayed PL, DPL and DTMF codes. If connected to a transceiver it could also send those codes along with other types of things like 5-tone. Several of us had these but most of us replaced them with the smaller and easier to mount CD-1.

I still have one of my 4 CD-1’s. Back in the day I had one connected to a scanner in the car, two at home and one in my office at work. They were awesome!

TV-R7000 Adapter:
If you had an Icom R-7000 back in the day you could get one of these add-on devices that bolted to the side of the radio. It would allow one to then receive TV video along with the audio (which the R7000 could already do). You would connect it to a monitor via a composite video connector and watch TV with your $2000 radio. Sure beats watching on a $200 TV!

Seriously though it was actually a useful device. It could allow one to view Amateur TV and view DX signals when conditions were up. I had one on a couple of my R7000’s over the years and even used it occasionally.

AOR ARD-25
I honestly don’t know why these things were as wildly popular as they were back in the mid 2000’s. I was working the Scanner Master booth at the Dayton Hamvention in the Hara Arena soon after the ARD-25 was introduced. We had a couple dozen of them and were worried we would have to ship most of them back after the fest. The first day we sold our entire stock of them and had reservations for many more. We were able to get a new stock overnighted to us at the hotel due to some friendly connections with AOR and sold the entire batch Saturday.

The ARD-25 was an accessory to connected to a high-end receiver like the R7000, AOR R8600 or similar rigs with a 10.7 MHz. IF output. It would then allow that receiver to tune P25 conventional signals.

Basically, it was a $300 device that connected to a $2000 receiver that allowed it to do some of what a $400 scanner would do better. It did not work on trunking, and that constituted 90% of P25 usage then and now. While it wasn’t a thing then it would not do Phase II P25 (TDMA). Paul Opitz and I discussed this phenomenon in the booth that year and neither of us could figure out why they were flying off the shelves. We also sold BCD996T scanners that did everything the ARD25 could do at a fraction of the overall cost.

I guess it was another case of “too much money, not enough brain”.

Dataslicers:
A dataslicer was a device that converted audio signals to a level readable by a computer serial port. This would allow you to decode various forms of over-the-air data like RTTY or pagers. It could also decode the old 9600 baud Mobile Data Terminals popular with police, fire, taxicabs and others in the 1980’s thru the 2000’s before most of these went to commercial or encrypted services.

The Dataslicer is what got Bill Cheek in trouble 25 years ago. He sold some of these and got arrested as he advertised that they could decode the current MDTs in use at the time. While the case was never adjudicated due to Bill’s subsequent death, it appeared to have had the “Streisand Effect”, making it more visible and thus desired.

While one could buy dataslicers commercially at the time the “2-Level” version was simple to make out of RadioShack components. I made several of these for my own use as well as for friends. If you did it right, you could fit it all in the shell of a DB-9 connector. There was also a more complicated 4-Level dataslicer that worked on newer data modes. The one I had was commercially made.

Most of the interesting stuff one would use a dataslicer for, like MDT’s or pagers, have switched to newer modes and encryption. Back in the day however they, along with free software found on the Internet, made for some really interesting intercepts!

Conclusion:
These were just a few of the accessories may of us back in the day used to further our obsession with all things radio. I am sure that many of you had these and others so please comment below on what you used.
OR the DNE-12 from Don Noble Electronics ?
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
5,934
Location
Far NW Valley
OR the DNE-12 from Don Noble Electronics ?
I had a Ramsey inversion decoder that worked pretty well.

I have a friend who could listed to inversion-scrambled comms and understand the words somehow. The same guy could listed to a scanner and tell you to PL tone in use by ear. He did that better with scanners from RadioShack as they had better audio processing (or less perhaps).
 

Blackswan73

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
1,562
Location
Central Indiana
I had a little circuit board roughly the dimensions of a pack of cigarettes back around 1969 that had a Motorola antenna jack, a short Motorola antenna cable and a red power wire. You could connect your car antenna to the jack and plug the cable into your car AM radio to receive VHF hi police calls. The calls came in between 600kc to 800kc. It worked well and stayed completely hidden behind the radio. One of several little gimmicks I had in my first car

B.S.
 

rf_patriot200

Active Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Messages
625
Location
Freeport, Illinois
I had a little circuit board roughly the dimensions of a pack of cigarettes back around 1969 that had a Motorola antenna jack, a short Motorola antenna cable and a red power wire. You could connect your car antenna to the jack and plug the cable into your car AM radio to receive VHF hi police calls. The calls came in between 600kc to 800kc. It worked well and stayed completely hidden behind the radio. One of several little gimmicks I had in my first car

B.S.
I remember those. They're called Transverters. they made one for aircraft too, I think.
 

cubn

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
1,722
Location
Marion/Johnson County, IN
For years I used a AA powered voice-activated cassette recorder with a 3.5mm to 3.5mm audio cable (from Radio Shack of course).

Great for recording and then mapping out police callsigns to their respective cities (for shared frequencies or talkgroups).

Truth be told, I still sometimes pull it out to record on a DMR channel (as the CCR's have better range than my 436).
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
5,934
Location
Far NW Valley
My first computer was a TRS-80, hated it and never got it to do much of anything. I had the included cassette recorder meant for it. While it was basically a standard voice recorder for the time it apparently had a more stable action intended for data.

I found that it worked very well for radio recording with the Nitelogger. When I gave the computer away to a friend (who never forgave me) I kept the recorder and used it for my radio stuff.
 

SABER3

Saber3
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 28, 2009
Messages
94
I still have my ”Nitelogger”. It helped me tease out many frequencies & their use by various agency’s.it did great work on UHF air-air frequencies the USAF & ANG units were using for combat cap over the tri-star area after 9-11-01. many of those were still in use years later; I listened to the C-17‘s carrying a friends BCT heading to Ratznestistan. I had a TT & CTCSS decoder I assembled from somewhere. Hooked it up to get CTCSS tones [I found out it did DTCS also] for various agency’s. With My Icom R-71A & a mast mounted pre-amp, I discovered the 454-459 Mhz air phones in the mid-90’s while searching for local RR PD vehicle extender Freq’s. I iwas surprised how easy they were easy to monitor. There was a lotta traffic on those freq’s then, and lo & behold it started decoding phone numbers. Lotta VIP govt, media & entertainment people had no idea they weren’t on a secure device. My main v/uhf scanner was the radio shack scanner that you could add the Opto-Scan accessory board to that increased the Rs-400 to 1k channels. There was some nifty software for it, one feature of the software was you could lock out a busy PL tone, especially good for finding tones used by other users.
 

wa8pyr

Technischer Guru
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,248
Location
Ohio
In prior Tales I have mentioned such obsolete tech like the OptoElectronics Scout and OptoScan. These tools, while still useful these days for some purposes have pretty much been made obsolete by newer scanners and accessories that have included the features they were useful for. For example, the Scout, especially when combined with a compatible scanner like the equally obsolete AR8000, would detect a strong transmission and display the resulting hit and send the connected radio tot hat channel so you could listen in. For $600 or so plus about as much for the radio one could have a cool near-field receiver. These days you can get the same experience from a sub-$200 BC125AT scanner with CloseCall.

Maybe “Obsolete” isn’t the right word; “Redundant” might be better. The features are still useful but the need for a specialized accessory isn’t as that has been included into newer radios and devices.

Let’s take a trip back a few years or decades and revisit some of the neatest tools us old farts used to use to accomplish what the younger generation takes for granted.

“Nitelogger”
The NiteLogger was a radio-tape recorder interface that would turn on and off a standard cassette recorder (another obsolete technology) when scanner traffic occurred. There were a couple versions, the original and an improved NiteLogger II. Both versions had a similar premise; connect it between a scanner and tape recorded and the device would detect audio and activate the connected tape recorder. It also had a speaker with a volume control so one could hear the audio live as the radio’s speaker would be disconnected as the NiteLogger plugged into the external speaker or earphone jack.

I had a couple of the first version, but never had a NiteLogger II. As far as I knew the NiteLogger II only differed in case style and replaced the relay with a newer version. This ran for about $50 in the early 2000’s, probably around $100 in today’s money.

The NiteLogger did not include a tape recorder, one used a standard cassette recorder. In the day, cassette recorders came with a dual jack, a “Mini” audio jack for the mic and a “Sub-mini” labeled “Remote”. This is what made the NiteLogger work. It took the scanner audio, and thru an audio circuit converted the 4–16-ohm speaker level audio to the 600-ohm impedance used by tape recorder mic inputs. With a VOX circuit it used a relay to close the Remote jack’s contacts to activate the recorder. It came with an audio cable to plug into the scanner external speaker or earphone jack and a dual cable to the recorder. You connected it up and used the NiteLogger’s level control to adjust the audio properly. You then set the recorder to “Record” (Remembering to press both he Play and Record buttons!) and went to bed. When you woke up the tape would be full of all the activity from overnight with no dead air.

Sometimes I would set up the NiteLogger on my work channel and when I got home from work, I would play back my evening to see how my voice sounded over the radio. I know a guy who for years recorded the Illinois police Aid channel (ISPERN, 155.475) with one of these all the time. A couple of us played a trick on him one night and made a fake broadcast using a radio that would transmit in the sub-milliwatt range, basically you had to be within 20 or 30 feet to hear it. We “broadcast” a fake message about his car being stolen and pursued. We did another call later about a manhunt in his neighborhood and when he asked if we had heard about it we denied all knowledge.

M6000, M7000 and M8000 Data Decoders:
The Infotech M7000 data decoder was the pinnacle of RTTY, WeFax and other data mode decoding back in the 1980’s. This ran for upwards of $1000 dollars then, which is like almost $3000 today. There were older versions like the M6000 and rigs from other companies but the M7000 was the top of the line. Connected to the record jack of a stable HF receiver and you could decode and view all kinds of data services on a CRT monitor or your trusty Apple Image Writer. I had 3 of these over the years, one bought from a friend and another traded for some radios. The third I bought at a hamfest 2 years ago for $25 but it didn’t work so I gave it away.

When I had my first one, I paired it with my Panasonic RF-4900 HF radio. The Panasonic was much more stable than the R71A or my IC-735, especially once you warmed the thing up by leaving it on overnight. I would set up on a RTTY frequency and come home to a stack of paper with news and weather reports, aviation messages etc.

Eventually the M7000 was supplanted by the M8000, I had one for a while but by then had moved on to different interests so it didn’t last long. Supposedly it could decode the early mobile data terminals of the 1990’s but I never tried that then.

These days one would use a free computer program and an SDR to perform the same tasks but in those days, we didn’t have that luxury. If you were hard-core or had more money than brains this is what you did.

Police Call and Scanner Master Frequency Directories
Before the days of Radio Reference and the rest of the Internet scanner hobbyists used our own version of the phonebook to find scanner frequencies or figure out what that new station I heard was. Paper guides were the only way to go since it was all we had.

Police Call, edited by Gene Costin and later Rich Barnett, was the granddaddy of scanner guides. It was more than a data dump, but that is what it was based upon. Gene added channel numbers and notes to many frequencies listed, most sent in by readers. The most prolific of us would be sent copies of the complete 9-volume set as thanks for the info provided.

Scanner Master started out by producing highly detailed scanner guides. This took the concept to an art form with maps, charts and channel guides. A nationwide guide called “Monitor America” detailed the state police, highway patrol and metro area channels for the entire country. Local guides like the Illinois Communications Guide (which I edited) and others had hyper-detailed listings for the coverage area.

Soon enough however the Internet came along and ruined things for producers of paper guides. While a good thing for hobbyists and professionals alike those of us that produced guides on processed dead trees had to figure some other was to monetize our hobby. Radio Reference eventually made the paper guidebooks obsolete as one could look up the information for free on their website via a computer, tablet or cellphone.

CSI CD-1 PL/DPL/DTMF Decoders (as other similar devices)
Back in the day scanners did not have instantaneous PL and DPL decoding like we have now. If you wanted to decode PL codes, you would have to program a PL capable radio with all of the PL’s and scroll thru them manually until you found the right one. This could be tedious at best. One of my friends who was seriously into PL codes would program a BC760XLT (The first commonly available scanner with PL tones) with the optional PL deck with all 38 of the standard PL codes and scan thru them to find the active one. He wore out the button labels on his scanner but by then had the layout memorized so it really didn’t matter.

Another method was by using a frequency counter that would read the lower-than-audible tones. This required some sort of interface circuit to a scanner and if you knew how to do it could be effective but not always really accurate.

Enter CSI and OptoElectronics! CSI introduced the CD-1 Decoder and around the same time Opto had the DC440. Each of these would connect to a discriminator jack and instantly decode and display the active PL code. They also decoded DPL codes (something the BC760 could not) as well as DTMF (“Touchtone” ©). These boxes were awesome for the advanced hobbyist as they would instantly display the active tone live. I preferred the less expensive CD-1 (as well as its successor CD-2) as the bid red LED display could be viewed across the room. The DC440 had a much smaller LCD display but had more features like recall memory.

There were other devices we used at the time. The Zetron Model 8 Repeater Programmer was a large device that had a huge LED display. While intended of course as a repeater programmer and timekeeper it decoded and displayed PL, DPL and DTMF codes. If connected to a transceiver it could also send those codes along with other types of things like 5-tone. Several of us had these but most of us replaced them with the smaller and easier to mount CD-1.

I still have one of my 4 CD-1’s. Back in the day I had one connected to a scanner in the car, two at home and one in my office at work. They were awesome!

TV-R7000 Adapter:
If you had an Icom R-7000 back in the day you could get one of these add-on devices that bolted to the side of the radio. It would allow one to then receive TV video along with the audio (which the R7000 could already do). You would connect it to a monitor via a composite video connector and watch TV with your $2000 radio. Sure beats watching on a $200 TV!

Seriously though it was actually a useful device. It could allow one to view Amateur TV and view DX signals when conditions were up. I had one on a couple of my R7000’s over the years and even used it occasionally.

AOR ARD-25
I honestly don’t know why these things were as wildly popular as they were back in the mid 2000’s. I was working the Scanner Master booth at the Dayton Hamvention in the Hara Arena soon after the ARD-25 was introduced. We had a couple dozen of them and were worried we would have to ship most of them back after the fest. The first day we sold our entire stock of them and had reservations for many more. We were able to get a new stock overnighted to us at the hotel due to some friendly connections with AOR and sold the entire batch Saturday.

The ARD-25 was an accessory to connected to a high-end receiver like the R7000, AOR R8600 or similar rigs with a 10.7 MHz. IF output. It would then allow that receiver to tune P25 conventional signals.

Basically, it was a $300 device that connected to a $2000 receiver that allowed it to do some of what a $400 scanner would do better. It did not work on trunking, and that constituted 90% of P25 usage then and now. While it wasn’t a thing then it would not do Phase II P25 (TDMA). Paul Opitz and I discussed this phenomenon in the booth that year and neither of us could figure out why they were flying off the shelves. We also sold BCD996T scanners that did everything the ARD25 could do at a fraction of the overall cost.

I guess it was another case of “too much money, not enough brain”.

Dataslicers:
A dataslicer was a device that converted audio signals to a level readable by a computer serial port. This would allow you to decode various forms of over-the-air data like RTTY or pagers. It could also decode the old 9600 baud Mobile Data Terminals popular with police, fire, taxicabs and others in the 1980’s thru the 2000’s before most of these went to commercial or encrypted services.

The Dataslicer is what got Bill Cheek in trouble 25 years ago. He sold some of these and got arrested as he advertised that they could decode the current MDTs in use at the time. While the case was never adjudicated due to Bill’s subsequent death, it appeared to have had the “Streisand Effect”, making it more visible and thus desired.

While one could buy dataslicers commercially at the time the “2-Level” version was simple to make out of RadioShack components. I made several of these for my own use as well as for friends. If you did it right, you could fit it all in the shell of a DB-9 connector. There was also a more complicated 4-Level dataslicer that worked on newer data modes. The one I had was commercially made.

Most of the interesting stuff one would use a dataslicer for, like MDT’s or pagers, have switched to newer modes and encryption. Back in the day however they, along with free software found on the Internet, made for some really interesting intercepts!

Conclusion:
These were just a few of the accessories may of us back in the day used to further our obsession with all things radio. I am sure that many of you had these and others so please comment below on what you used.
I forget who made it, but there was a PL/DPL decoder built into the same case as the BC760 scanner, and designed to be mounted on top of the scanner. Worked great.

Dave Marshall and I spent days driving all over Ohio with one of those rigs (and other equipment) logging and verifying info for the Scanner Master Ohio Pocket Guide. I’ve still got several of the Scanner Master guides (pocket and full-size) I received for being Ohio editor.

And I’ve still got a couple of data slicers I built myself. Don’t really get used anymore, but I’ve got ‘em if I need them.

Never had a Nitelogger, but I still have my Turbo-Whopper Pro-2004; one of the enhancements I made to that was the tape recorder switch, which got used a lot. Still have the tape recorder, too.
 
Last edited:
Top