the SDS100 is definitely not a dud, whats funny is the same people who bash it always bash Uniden,
You noticed that too?
And others will defend them, regardless of issue.
the SDS100 is definitely not a dud, whats funny is the same people who bash it always bash Uniden,
You noticed that too?
I think the CPSC needs to get involved, personally.
Your steering wheel wasn't self-heated by an internal component, it was heated by the sun...Make sure they recall my steering wheel while you're at it, as it was hotter than the hottest part of the scanner.
And others will defend them, regardless of issue.
You're all over the place on this one, Jon.
A temperature of 111 °F over time can cause burns.
An object 93 million miles away can cause burns.
Don't say an antenna connector 40° above ambient temperature isn't a potential hazard because I can think of several scenarios where it could cause burns; such as a disabled person with limited feeling in their extremities not knowing they are causing burns or a small child getting ahold of it and burning themselves.
I think the CPSC needs to get involved, personally.
BS. I've been very consistent that this is not a safety issue, that the real-world risk of someone being burned by a SDS100 is zero, and that claims otherwise are not based on any sort of reality. I cited a worst-case scenario (leaving the scanner running in a hot car for over an hour) in which the hottest part of the scanner still failed to get hot enough and remain hot long enough to become a burn hazard. I did in fact grasp the antenna connector when I returned to my vehicle, and it did not burn me, it quickly cooled to a few degrees above body temperature as the heat in the connector transferred to my hand. And it did so long before there was any chance of causing any kind of burn to anyone, even a child with sensitive skin.
It remains to be seen what long-term effect the heat may have on the scanner components. But claiming the heat from the scanner is an injury risk to the user is provably false scaremongering.
the real-world risk of someone being burned by a SDS100 is zero,
You misrepresent the cited case. The person was in the car with the scanner running for over an hour, with the air conditioner on and deep tinted windows-the scanner was not in direct sunlight
Then we are talking about two different cases. I was referring to this one:
https://forums.radioreference.com/uniden-tech-support/374170-sds100-heating-red-hot-red-flag.html
Which you are obviously aware of since you have posted in it.
I did not see the post where you conducted your own experiment, I apologize for the error.
BTW, I have some personal experience with burns, and this is the hand I used to temp test the SDS100 antenna connector (video is from several years ago):
https://www.facebook.com/jonathan.wienke.5/videos/10152132489737059/?l=5018766514948962453
Why all the complaints about the generation of heat? You're a whole lot closer to having the waffle maker feature than you thought you'd be!![]()
Actually if you have ever been burned it is not. What is ridiculous is not doing any research about it before posting.That is so irrelevant it is ridiculous. :roll:
Why all the complaints about the generation of heat? You're a whole lot closer to having the waffle maker feature than you thought you'd be!![]()
Actually if you have ever been burned it is not. What is ridiculous is not doing any research about it before posting.