scannerman5555
Silent Key
anyone got the pl /dcs tone for them ?
sounds like a plainview repeater !
sounds like a plainview repeater !
A new GMRS repeater identifying itself as "SHTFLI" recently popped up on 462.625 which is interfering with existing repeaters on the same frequency in the NYC area. It appears that this new repeater which sounds like it is in Nassau County, Long Island is running excessively high power. Can anyone give me further information on this new repeater and what the output power limitations are as per FCC rules and regulations?
Just one question - Is this GMRS repeater legally required to identify with assigned call letters, as an amateur repeater would be? This, as opposed to "SHTFLI"? The intent and purpose of the machine are above board and I'm not naysaying the project whatsoever.
Actually, it turns out the repeater does not have to ID itself (though it's a good idea anyway) as long as the repeated station does ID itself.
Sec. 95.119 Station identification.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (e), every GMRS station must
transmit a station identification:
(1) Following the transmission of communications or a series of
communications; and
(2) Every 15 minutes during a long transmission.
(b) The station identification is the call sign assigned to the GMRS
station or system.
(c) A unit number may be included after the call sign in the
identification.
(d) The station identification must be transmitted in:
(1) Voice in the English language; or
(2) International Morse code telegraphy.
(e) A station need not identify its transmissions if it
automatically retransmits communications from another station which are
properly identified.
[48 FR 35237, Aug. 3, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 68975, Dec. 14, 1998]
Sec. 95.33 Cooperative use of radio stations in the GMRS.
(a) Licensees (a licensee is the entity to which the license is
issued) of radio stations in the GMRS may share the use of their
stations with other entities eligible in the GMRS, subject to the
following conditions and limitations.
(1) The station to be shared must be individually owned by the
licensee, jointly owned by the participants and the licensee, leased
individually by the licensee, or leased jointly by the participants and
the licensee.
(2) The licensee must maintain access to and control over all
stations authorized under its license.
(3) A station may be shared only:
(i) Without charge;
(ii) On a non-profit basis, with contributions to capital and
operating expenses including the cost of mobile stations and paging
receivers prorated equitably among all participants; or
(iii) On a reciprocal basis, i.e., use of one licensee's stations
for the use of another licensee's stations without charge for either
capital or operating expenses.
(4) All sharing arrangements must be conducted in accordance with a
written agreement to be kept as part of the station records.
(b) [Reserved]
[48 FR 35237, Aug. 3, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 68975, Dec. 14, 1998]
The FCC doesn't pay much attention to the written records part, true... but it is in the regulations.
What exactly is so distasteful of the acronym?
S.H.T.F.L.I
Samaritans Helping The Families of Long Island
I'm hearing the word Sh*t being used freely now on amateur repeaters. Not sure if the practice originated on GMRS.
I'm hearing the word Sh*t being used freely now on amateur repeaters. Not sure if the practice originated on GMRS.
As the OP of this thread, I can tell you that the co-channel interference that is affecting the licensed GMRS repeater is mostly in part due to SHTFLI. I am well aware of the MYGMRS website but their database for the NYC Metro area is out of date since the radio geography is very fluid.
As far as the "Ham Arrogant" comments from Willgrah, I feel that your personal attack on the other poster is uncalled for. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I too hold both a GMRS and Amateur Radio license and both radio services certainly have their faults, mostly all human in nature`.
As the OP of this thread, I can tell you that the co-channel interference that is affecting the licensed GMRS repeater is mostly in part due to SHTFLI. I am well aware of the MYGMRS website but their database for the NYC Metro area is out of date since the radio geography is very fluid.
As far as the "Ham Arrogant" comments from Willgrah, I feel that your personal attack on the other poster is uncalled for. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I too hold both a GMRS and Amateur Radio license and both radio services certainly have their faults, mostly all human in nature`.
where in the GMRS rules and regulations does it say they would need special licensing. just curious to know. because I don't remember seeing it anywhere. only thing I have ever notices was that they cant link machines through phone lines. a bit of a grey area I guess.
The only rules in this particular area that I recall off the top of my head relate to interconnection of a GMRS repeater to a POTS network (telephone system). I don't believe the language of the Part 95 rules specifically prohibit a repeater link, but more prohibit interconnection.
Of course, prohibiting POTS interconnection pretty much prohibits long distance linking. Unless you have some means of over-the-air or some other method that doesn't involve attaching the repeater to the telephone system.