• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Simplex Base and Repeater co-location

emtunderwood

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Messages
142
Reaction score
10
Can a Simplex Base Station and a Repeater be co-located at the same site at the same height same(TX Freq.) without issue?
 

AK4PY

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2022
Messages
93
Reaction score
111
Think about it... if your repeater has the same TX frequency as your base station receiver, how is it supposed to receive? What is it that you are actually trying to accomplish?
 

K4EET

Chaplain
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
2,995
Reaction score
2,219
Location
Severn, Maryland, USA
Can a Simplex Base Station and a Repeater be co-located at the same site at the same height same(TX Freq.) without issue?
Yes, what are you trying to accomplish? If the simplex base station is the same frequency as the repeater’s transmit frequency, one would think you don’t need the simplex base station. The subscribers (base stations at other locations, mobiles, and portables) would all be configured to use the repeater.

If you are thinking your configuration would support two simultaneous conversations, that is not going to work. Besides, the simplex base station’s receiver’s front end would be blown out when the repeater transmits with the two antennas at the same height on the tower.
 

emtunderwood

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Messages
142
Reaction score
10
Think about it... if your repeater has the same TX frequency as your base station receiver, how is it supposed to receive? What is it that you are actually trying to accomplish?
We have a bit of coverage issue and just honestly due to terrain and availablity of tower sites and locations. I yes now that I think about the question I asked... I'm a DUMA$$ SMH LOL. But we were wanting dispatch to be on the simplex and operations off the repeater.
 

AK4PY

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2022
Messages
93
Reaction score
111
We have a bit of coverage issue and just honestly due to terrain and availablity of tower sites and locations. I yes now that I think about the question I asked... I'm a DUMA$$ SMH LOL. But we were wanting dispatch to be on the simplex and operations off the repeater.
Depending on the model of repeater, you could have dispatch transmitting and receiving via wireline or similar directly from the repeater. That would accomplish the same thing as dispatch using a base station, and the field units would still use the repeater as normal.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
36,374
Location
United States
We have a bit of coverage issue and just honestly due to terrain and availablity of tower sites and locations. I yes now that I think about the question I asked... I'm a DUMA$$ SMH LOL. But we were wanting dispatch to be on the simplex and operations off the repeater.

Yeah, not sure what you are trying to accomplish here.

If coverage is the issue, then adding a simplex base (fixed based in FCC terms), you are not going to gain anything.
Coverage is only going to be addressed by getting you repeater in a better location, or adding satellite receivers around your area.

This is a place where a professional (not a hobby radio site) will be able to properly design a system using legitimate propagation modeling tools will be able to design a solution to the issue that does not rely on guesswork or input from hobbyists. A professional consultant will cost more up front, but they will give you a guaranteed solution at the end. That'll mean you'll be paying once, and not going back to the City/County asking for more money to shotgun random solutions.
 

freddaniel

Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
171
Reaction score
87
Location
Newport Beach, CA
There is a real advantage to Dispatch being wireline or directly connected to the repeater, so it acted like a duplex base station. Should a mobile or portable talk while the dispatcher is transmitting, the dispatcher would be able to hear the mobile or portable "break-in" to the conversation. Otherwise, if the dispatcher used a Control Station, the dispatcher would not hear the mobile or portable while transmitting. A Control Station would be a good "backup" to a direct connected dispatch link, in case of a circuit failure.
The installer would simply disable the transmit mute feature on the dispatch control console.
 

emtunderwood

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Messages
142
Reaction score
10
Yeah, not sure what you are trying to accomplish here.

If coverage is the issue, then adding a simplex base (fixed based in FCC terms), you are not going to gain anything.
Coverage is only going to be addressed by getting you repeater in a better location, or adding satellite receivers around your area.

This is a place where a professional (not a hobby radio site) will be able to properly design a system using legitimate propagation modeling tools will be able to design a solution to the issue that does not rely on guesswork or input from hobbyists. A professional consultant will cost more up front, but they will give you a guaranteed solution at the end. That'll mean you'll be paying once, and not going back to the City/County asking for more money to shotgun random solutions.
Our city/county pays for nothing not even the radio system. But makes sure they use everyone elses radio systems and no cost to them..
It a piss-poor Sh!tty situation honestly... It's sad!!
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,794
Reaction score
2,941
Location
Sector 001
Think about it... if your repeater has the same TX frequency as your base station receiver, how is it supposed to receive? What is it that you are actually trying to accomplish?
Using circulators and 0khz separation hybrid combiners, you absolutely can do this. It's incredibly lossy, and if your feedline or antenna issues cause high swr, you're going to cook your receiver.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,672
Reaction score
14,865
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
There is a real advantage to Dispatch being wireline or directly connected to the repeater, so it acted like a duplex base station. Should a mobile or portable talk while the dispatcher is transmitting, the dispatcher would be able to hear the mobile or portable "break-in" to the conversation. Otherwise, if the dispatcher used a Control Station, the dispatcher would not hear the mobile or portable while transmitting. A Control Station would be a good "backup" to a direct connected dispatch link, in case of a circuit failure.
The installer would simply disable the transmit mute feature on the dispatch control console.
In this case you could even program the repeater for half duplex. Dispatch will hear all calls from mobiles, all mobiles will hear dispatch. Scanner users will be sad because they would have to program the mobile side separate and would have spotty reception compared to all mobiles passing through the repeater.
 
Top