• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Skip levels and local

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,886
Reaction score
3,877
Location
Fort Worth
(Time limit grumble)

During Skip I have to back off RFG a fair amount, SQ not so much I also have to max RFP so that the usual poor radio rigs can hear me.

Without Skip we all have an easier time. My capture radius is improved for the odd angles when without, but it doesn’t terrifically affect my signal capture given better big truck rigs (export radios).

I have baseline settings for both periods. Took awhile to work out what was best as a starting point (max distance goal).

.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,886
Reaction score
3,877
Location
Fort Worth
(NRC) AM/FM BILL 3



.
 
Last edited:

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,886
Reaction score
3,877
Location
Fort Worth
Looks like the Bill III could be the smallest mobile of all time. President should add SSB capability.

HARRISON is the SSB candidate (relative size).

The new AQUARIO 70 is tiny and with SSB ($399).

For short range the FM & P-channels make B3 ideal as trail & campground radio now that it has NRC.

Rock quarry excavator. Scale house. Gate guard.
There’s a long list of potential users.

— Used to be parked regularly a mile from a 24/7 beef plant. Constant chatter. Wouldn’t have been any requests to repeat. Trucker or Receiver.
Both had loud backgrounds.

If I keyed up I’d get bombed with, “What radio is that?” by the cattle haulers. They were making their way toward NRC STRYKER. Voice arising from a totally silenced background. Noise stripped from voice.

Clarity is King.


.
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,482
Reaction score
711
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
Yes, but the one from the industry magazine was about direct line of sight being impacted by heavy smoke.

Tropo is understandable. VHF direct line of sight getting impacted to the point of not being able to talk to a radio that they can "see" is another level.

I have measured the impact (of smoke) at microwave frequencies. And I can see it being a thing at UHF and VHF under certain very specific conditions of frequency, smoke density, and smoke source. But really, I would be surprised if it impacted HF at anything detectable in the field. Sure, there is probably some theoretical issue, or fractions of a DB in path loss that can be measured in the lab, but probably nothing that would be repeatable or reliably quantifiable in the open air.

I suspect that the makeup / source of the smoke would play a great deal also. Hydrocarbon based smoke? I bet that has more of an impact, and at lower frequencies (still don't think it would be much at HF though). But fine smoke and ash from undergrowth is probably a good bit less of an impact.

T!
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,101
Reaction score
32,323
Location
United States
But really, I would be surprised if it impacted HF at anything detectable in the field. Sure, there is probably some theoretical issue, or fractions of a DB in path loss that can be measured in the lab, but probably nothing that would be repeatable or reliably quantifiable in the open air.

I agree, I wish I could find the article. It was specifically about simplex VHF on wildland fires . It was noticed by end users, and took some careful testing to prove it.
 
Top