After reviewing the OCSO website and considering the kind of info I heard on the radio, I think 460.500 (OCSO Ch 13) may be used for the OCSO Warrant Squad.
d_stew said:What I can't understand is this...if you're a big enough criminal to attract the attention of a federal agency, wouldn't it be prudent to do a little counter-intelligence by using a scanner? I mean, you're already gonna be charged with some serious felonies if you're caught. Are you really worried about being charged with using a scanner in the commission of a crime? Then again, if you're stupid enough to think you can break the law forever and not get caught, then maybe you're stupid enough to not use a scanner, or maybe use it correctly.![]()
Gilligan said:And with all the new technology and ITAC channels and such, I never hear anyone talking to anyone. During pursuits, it still all goes through their dispatchers, county to city to state... Sometimes I wonder about this new technology... and this from a person who's grown up with it, not from living in the old days of 100% conventional.
woodyrr said:...I have concluded that the individuals that dreamed up this fiasco define interoperability as what needs to happen after a major disaster and my concept is that interoperability is the small interoperabilities that happen every day. Their version of interoperability is accomplished by having the LMAs, RMAs, SMAs, that everyone switches to long after a diasaster has happened and TCBs and Mobile Command Posts to link disparate systems. My version of interoperability is a function of one agency being able to monitor other agencies passively, to catch an incident threatening to affect the jurisdiction in real time, and then be able to switch to the lead agency’s channel and assist until the incident is concluded or until it no longer threatens...
woodyrr said:This is kind of a sticky subject, so I don't want to go into great detail. I think that it is important to look at the use of scanners by criminals from the perspective of a criminal rather than that of a "monitor". It is my opinion that the monitoring skills that I know that you possess were developed over a period of years listening to specific agencies and multiple radios simultaneously. You know what the agencies that you monitor are going to do before they do it from years of familiarity with the agency and the radio system that they use. The long term investment that you have made in developing your monitoring skills into an effective tool is not something that a criminal has any interest in doing.
Just my 2.
I think that you are right.
What really concerns me as this whole thing comes together, is that while one of the stated primary objectives, especially at the Federal level. is interoperability, mutual aid in central Oklahoma is worse now than it has been in a decade. At the RadioReference meeting, I jokingly quipped that I was getting sick and tired of "you scanner people griping about these 800 MHz radio systems. They are being implemented for interoperability: The fact that nobody can talk to anybody else is totally beside the point!"
I have concluded that the individuals that dreamed up this fiasco define interoperability as what needs to happen after a major disaster and my concept is that interoperability is the small interoperabilities that happen every day. Their version of interoperability is accomplished by having the LMAs, RMAs, SMAs, that everyone switches to long after a diasaster has happened and TCBs and Mobile Command Posts to link disparate systems. My version of interoperability is a function of one agency being able to monitor other agencies passively, to catch an incident threatening to affect the jurisdiction in real time, and then be able to switch to the lead agency’s channel and assist until the incident is concluded or until it no longer threatens. This form of mutual aid, which used to happen frequently, could have easily been implemented, yet simply does not appear to be supported within the 800 system. As an example, as far as I know, OHP cruisers don’t have MCPD 6A or MCFD 7A or even MWC Mutual Aid. Likewise I have no evidence that Midwest City units have OHP AM1. If Midwest City is working an accident on I40 and Air Depot (as if that never happens), they should all be able to get together on the radio so that they can all cordinate their activities rapidly, safely, and without waste of time and effort. Even with both agencies on the same 800 system, that doesn't happen.
There. Have I stirred the puddin' enough?
woodyrr said:There. Have I stirred the puddin' enough?
PolarBear25 said:Sorry if fast2okc thinks that is wrong and he is right I have set in the car and I have see the display with my own two eyes,
gilligan said:Actually I think the display field is for admins to set up for displaying in scanners, not the display as seen in the users' radios. In this way, scanner software will already have 12-digit alphanumeric text tags that can be programmed into the scanner.
fast2okc said:As always, any input, suggestions and money are welcome.
--fast2okc
fast2okc said:--THREAD HIJACK ALERT--
Gilligan is correct here. The new version of the Radio Reference database will allow users to directly download from the database to their scanners. The "Alpha Tag" field will show in the display of the scanner. I have tried to choose Alpha Tags that will describe the user (in 12 characters or less) for both the local user and someone who might not be familiar with the area.
The users of this forum probably all know that SMA 1A is State Mutual Aid Channel 1A. However, a visitor from Tuscon might need a better description. It has ben my attempt to make this site usable for all possible users.
While making this change, I have attempted to continue to include the original "Radio Display", but I'm not certain I will continue. I'm not sure that anything other than the channel number serves any purpose. Except perhaps to prove that you have actually seen a radio.
It's like drawing the picture of the elephant in the dark. What you draw depends on what part you can touch at the time. For example, Midwest City Police radios have "6A MWC PD 1" in the display for their main dispatch talkgroup. An EMSA radio has that talkgroup in a Police Mutual Aid bank, labeled "4N MWC PD". An OHP Trooper's radio will have it labeled differently. My point is, the only relevant information is that Midwest City Police refer to the channel as 6A. The rest of the display is irrelevant.
You probably have notice that the DPS database has changed quite a bit. In addition to the new tags, there are GPS locations for each of the talkgroup groups and each of the transmitter sites in the system.
I have attempted to make the data as user friendly as possible. As always, any input, suggestions and money are welcome.
--fast2okc
fast2okc said:--THREAD HIJACK ALERT--
I have attempted to make the data as user friendly as possible. As always, any input, suggestions and money are welcome.
--fast2okc
Fine job, Fast. I may understand what "6A" is but someone riding in my truck won't, so spelling it out makes it easier.fast2okc said:--THREAD HIJACK ALERT--
I have attempted to make the data as user friendly as possible. As always, any input, suggestions and money are welcome.
--fast2okc
Chaos703 said:I want to take this quick opportunity to profoundly thank you for all your hard work. The information in the database and camaraderie in the forum has expanded my silly hobby in ways I never could have imagined. It's made a real difference to me.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. You are GREATLY appreciated!!!!
I'm on my way to donate a little something extra.
I'll be the cheetos of you buy the mountain dew!KK5FM said:You forgot Mountain Dew
how could you forget MOUNTAIN DEW?!?!!?