An interesting thread - and one that I can identify with.
A few years prior to my retirement, I was part of a committee charged with recommending which technology to employ for a county-wide preemption system. After many months of research, it eventually came down to two different systems... the mature technology that utilized optical emitters and detectors, versus a much newer, much more complex technology that utilized RF and GPS.
In a nutshell, the optical system required a simple emitter in each vehicle, as well as a preemption controller and multiple optical detectors for each intersection, while the RF system required a controller, GPS receiver and RF transmitter (and associated antennas) for each vehicle, as well as a controller, RF receiver and GPS receiver (and associated antennas) for each intersection. Special FCC licensing was also required.
I don't recall the actual cost difference, but the RF system was something more than twice as much as the optical system for the first corridor and a limited number of vehicles.
I found it interesting that although the RF system was much more expensive and much more complex, with multiple potential points of failure, the committee voted to recommend it for implementation.
I retired and moved away just before the first phase of the system was due to be installed. That was over 15 years ago. I wonder if that RF system is still in use?