stridsberg question

Status
Not open for further replies.

scannersnstuff

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
239
after reading many thread's and review's about the stridsberg 4 port amplified multicoupler,i got one. i hooked it up today.i'm running 3 base scanner's off of it.i did a little bit of comparison testing between the receiver's <2 bct15's and a pro-2006>.almost everything seem's to be working the same as before.here's my question's.i did notice that on the one trunked radio system i listen to,the data control channel alway's came in a bit crappy.i almost never had a problem with the signal dropping in and out.now it's degraded to the point that it cannot alway's track the system.i was sold 3 bnc to bnc patch cable's,rg58 50 ohm.

1.am i using the right patch cable's ?.
2.if i am, would getting the 3 ft.run instead of 6 foot help the signal ?.
3.would terminating the one open bnc port with a cap like the metal radioshack one help ?.

any help greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
N

N_Jay

Guest
after reading many thread's and review's about the stridsberg 4 port amplified multicoupler,i got one. i hooked it up today.i'm running 3 base scanner's off of it.i did a little bit of comparison testing between the receiver's <2 bct15's and a pro-2006>.almost everything seem's to be working the same as before.here's my question's.i did notice that on the one trunked radio system i listen too,the data control channel alway's came in a bit crappy.i almost never had a problem with the signal dropping in and out.now it's degraded to the point that it cannot alway's track the system.i was sold 3 bnc to bnc patch cable's,rg58 50 ohm.

1.am i using the right patch cable's ?.
2.if i am would getting the 3 ft.run instead of 6 foot help the signal ?.
3.would terminating the one open bnc port with a cap like the metal radioshack one help ?.

any help greatly appreciated.

Get rid of it.

Use a plain old cheap splitter.

Maybe add a proper receive amp if you find you need it.
 

scannersnstuff

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
239
n jay do you mean get rid of the stridsberg ?. for the most part it's doing it's job.it's just one frequency.
i tried the scannermaster and grove multicoupler. that didn't work out too well.that killed the 800 mhz.frequency completely.i'm afraid with a preamp that i'll kill the front end's.i have a high powered fm station at 200' about 1 air mile away from my house. i can see the top of it when i leave my driveway.thank's for the input.
edit - did a little research.the fm station is putting out 5,000 watts !.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

W6KRU

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,462
Reaction score
86
Location
Vista, CA
i have a high powered fm station at 200' about 1 air mile away from my house. i can see the top of it when i leave my driveway.thank's for the input.

Have you tried a filter to get rid of the FM broadcast signals?
 

scannersnstuff

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
239
i was going to try the filter.would you connect that inline with the multicoupler ?. are the more expensive tuned filter's better than the generic one's ?.
 

kinfolk

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Location
Springfield, Ohio
I have the same Stridsberg 4 port multicoupler that you have and have had great success with it. Originally I was only using 3 of the 4 ports so I capped the unused one with a dummy load. That did not seem to make any difference. I too have two closeby FM stations so I hooked up an HPN-30118 notch filter from Scannermaster and that has helped tremendously. It is hooked inline just before the Stridsberg. If you are concerned that the Stridsberg is harming the reception of the one control channel that you are having difficulty with, just try the antenna direct temporarily to see. I also am using 6 ft. RG 58 jumpers and they are not bothereing my 800 MHZ signals at all. I hope that this helps you. I think that the Stridsberg multicouplers do a terrific job.
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
n jay do you mean get rid of the stridsberg ?. for the most part it's doing it's job.it's just one frequency.
i tried the scannermaster and grove multicoupler. that didn't work out too well.that killed the 800 mhz.frequency completely.i'm afraid with a preamp that i'll kill the front end's.i have a high powered fm station at 200' about 1 air mile away from my house. i can see the top of it when i leave my driveway.thank's for the input.
edit - did a little research.the fm station is putting out 5,000 watts !.


A preamp will not hurt your front end. However used in the wrong application it can reduce reception.

Amplified splitters and NO DIFFERENT than a preamp and a splitter in one box. The fact it is reducing the reception on one frequency is a good indication that it is probably reducing reception on many frequencies (noticeably or not).

Have you tried a regular ordinary TV type splitter?
 

zz0468

QRT
Banned
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
6,034
Reaction score
277
It's all about the noise figure of the amplifier inside the Stridsberg coupler. If the noise figure is higher than that of the receiver behind it, then it will harm, not help, weak signal reception. If you see it make strong signals stronger, and weak signals seem weaker, that's exactly what's going on. This would explain why some people swear by these things and say they help.

I've noticed that their data sheets spec noise figure at 3.5 db. That's "fair", but not great. If you attempt to put a filter in front of it, the insertion loss adds directly to the noise figure of the entire setup... i.e. a filter with 2 db of loss in front of a preamp with a 3.5 db noise figure would give that combination a noise figure of 5.5 db, which is likely to be noticeably worse than the receiver itself is. The feedline from the antenna adds to that, so 1 db of loss would give that whole setup a 6.5 db noise figure, which is getting downright crappy. And the net effect would be "more bars" on the signal strength, and marginally weak signals would sound even weaker.
 

scannersnstuff

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
239
now i'm really miffed.the signal's that i used to get "clean" are now mostly coming in with image's.i did a search thru some scanner range's,and the scanner is locking up on a slew of frequencie's. i'm 99.9 % sure the multicoupler is going back.scanner master is checking with stridsberg on tuesday for a possible solution.if not they said i could send it back under their money back policy.
 

scannersnstuff

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
239
well even a dumb ass can admit when he made a mistake.i had switched the cables from my 2 antenna's,and ran the wrong one to the multicoupler.the signal's have basically all cleaned up.my comment's on the one 800 mhz.trunk i listen too still stand.no noticeable improvement.my thank's once again to scanner master,and especially Sumner.you guy's and gal's really stand behind what you sell.always nice to your customer's also.
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
now i'm really miffed.the signal's that i used to get "clean" are now mostly coming in with image's.i did a search thru some scanner range's,and the scanner is locking up on a slew of frequencie's. i'm 99.9 % sure the multicoupler is going back.scanner master is checking with stridsberg on tuesday for a possible solution.if not they said i could send it back under their money back policy.

Send it back.

But don't think it is bad. I am sure it is just doing what it does best.

Have you tried a plain old TV splitter?

If so, what indicated that you needed an amp?
 

ka5lqj

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
Location
Near Lakeview, LA (Caddo Parish)
I want one!

Gee!

When I can afford it, I *want* one of John's (Stridesburg)'s couplers/splitters. John lives here in town and I know him. He's not "dumb" my any means as he's designed the antennas, etc. on the Space Shuttles for NASA. They seem to work well, LOL!

Now, as far as the cable company "splitter", that's one way to "po-boy" it, until you can afford better. I've used them both ways, as multi-port splitters and they do work of a fashion. But, I live within a mile and a half of a commercial two way radio shop that has a 1,000 watt paging transmitter. :-( It's going off every five seconds, it seems.

Now, if I had Warren Buffet's money, I have a place in the Wyoming mountains, near a mountain top with all kinds of towers, antennas, and the finest coax money could buy, LOL! But, I'm not him, so I have do what I can and just "enjoy" LIFE. ;-)

MAKE it a GREAT DAY! It's YOUR "choice", afterall.

Respectfully,
73,

Don/KA5LQJ/8W2308 Unit 3
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
Gee!

When I can afford it, I *want* one of John's (Stridesburg)'s couplers/splitters.

Why?

What do they do that a decent low noise amplifier ($25 to $75) and a quality TV splitter (<$10) would not accomplish??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top