TGIDs being reported incorrectly

LoneOwl

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
35
Reaction score
24
Location
Raleigh, NC
TGIDs being reported correctly on SDS200, not on other 2.
Using ProScan(24.4), & on Wake P25, history logging is showing 47052(Northeast Disp) as North Disp, or Northeast Disp, 47054(Downtown Disp) as being Southeast Dispatch & Downtown Disp, and 47055(Southwest Disp) as Northwest Dispatch & Southwest Disp.
Additionally, neither the 996 nor the 325 are logging the 47050, 47051 & 47053 TGIDs
 

Attachments

  • BCD996P2.jpg
    BCD996P2.jpg
    88.4 KB · Views: 21

KevinC

32D2T/957.282
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
14,389
Reaction score
23,360
Location
I'm everywhere Focker!
TGIDs being reported correctly on SDS200, not on other 2.
Using ProScan(24.4), & on Wake P25, history logging is showing 47052(Northeast Disp) as North Disp, or Northeast Disp, 47054(Downtown Disp) as being Southeast Dispatch & Downtown Disp, and 47055(Southwest Disp) as Northwest Dispatch & Southwest Disp.
Additionally, neither the 996 nor the 325 are logging the 47050, 47051 & 47053 TGIDs
Are they possibly patched?
 

LoneOwl

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
35
Reaction score
24
Location
Raleigh, NC
Thanks for the reply.
No, not patched. My SDS200 is logging all the proper TGIDS. The other 2 - BCD996p2 nor the BCD325P2 are not.
I assume if they were patched, the 200 would be logging identically to the others.
 

Spitfire8520

Might be slightly less clueless! =)
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
2,035
Reaction score
193
Location
Colorado
It sounds like the talkgroups are being patched as Kevin mentioned, and that was discussed in the Wake County P25 switch thread.

The SDS scanners ships with firmware that supports patched talkgroups from the factory, so that would be why you see talkgroups showing up as expected. If the firmware of your BCD996P2 and BCD325P2 is older than version 1.08.00, then they do not support when talkgroups are patched together. You should look into updating the firmware of your older scanners by following the instruction in the link below if you would like them to handle patched talkgroups like your SDS.


What happens behind the scenes is that the voice traffic from the patched talkgroups are redirected to a single talkgroup. In your case, it sounds like 47050 was redirected to 47055, 47051 to 47052, and 47053 to 47054. Patches can be identified if you ever get into control channel decoding, but it shows up in the ways you have described.
 

LoneOwl

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
35
Reaction score
24
Location
Raleigh, NC
That is EXACTLY the way it appears to be, and that's all fine & dandy, but what completely flummoxed me is why my SDS200 is reporting the correct TGIDs!
From here on out, I'll be using just the 200 to monitor RPD-Cary/Wake P25, leaving the 325 & 996 to scan my other interests.

Thanks to all for your input!
 
Top