Washington county Radio.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Allan_Love_Jr

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2005
Messages
886
Reaction score
2
Location
Fort Calhoun, Nebraska
Just not to long ago I bought myself a new Radio Shack Digital Scanner to monitor the Washington county law enforcement and I just don't monitor it anymore. Thier system is constantly breaking up. Changeing channels. I monitor it and then over a sudden the channel just breaks up big time. It's not my scanner. It's like the channel just goes off frequency all together. The DG goes to FM and so fourth. So I just gave up. I only use my Scanner only to monitor the Railroads now. It works great monitoring the Railroads. But as for Law enforcement? No!
 

43g70

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Have you programmed in the bank as a trunked system, not just put the channels in the bank as conventional?


43g70
 

realgeo

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
474
Reaction score
9
Location
Murray, NE
Good afternoon, Allan!

43g70 is correct! If you have a Pro96 or a Pro2096, they should be able to listen to the Washington County system with NO problem at all!

Generally-speaking, for any kind of trunking system on most newer Radio Shack scanners, you'd set-aside a specific bank of channels to represent that particular trunking system.

Then, you'd program the bank with the Control Channel(s) of the system you're wanting to listen to. From there, the scanner will constantly listen to the active control channel and automagically tune your scanner to follow and listen to active "talk groups".

"Talk-groups" on a trunked system are just like regular voice channels, only they're not generally tied to specific radio frequencies - they may "hop around" from time to time. This is what the "Trunk Tracking" feature of your scanner is designed for.

For example, if you're listening to the Washington County system and you want to listen to Talk-group 2001, your scanner would constantly listen to the active control channel. Then, when Talk-group 2001 becomes active, your scanner will automatically tune itself to the radio frequency that is currently handling the audio for that Talk-group. If the radio frequency changes from transmission to transmission, the scanner still knows how to "follow" that conversation because the active control channel transmits that information on the air. Think about it - all of the Law Enforcement radios have to have this same information so that they can properly follow the conversation as well.

The manual for your scanner should be fairly helpful in getting your system properly setup so that you can listen to Washington County!

Hope that helps!

73's de KC0HYI
 

realgeo

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
474
Reaction score
9
Location
Murray, NE
Howdy, once again!

I just wanted to clarify what I had written in my previous message. When I say ...

"you'd set-aside a specific bank of channels to represent that particular trunking system."

... I am referring to a "bank of channels" as one of the 100-channel banks that is in your scanner. As I recall it, the current Radio Shack products, even the ones that do digital, still use the Bank/Channel arrangement whereby the scanner memory is divided into 10 banks of 100 channels each.

Therefore, each trunking system you program would each take away a bank of 100 channels. When you use a bank for a trunking system, you cannot simultaneously use it for regular channels as well.

73's!
 

Mr_Observer

Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
BNSFrailfan said:
Just not to long ago I bought myself a new Radio Shack Digital Scanner to monitor the Washington county law enforcement and I just don't monitor it anymore. Thier system is constantly breaking up. Changeing channels. I monitor it and then over a sudden the channel just breaks up big time. It's not my scanner. It's like the channel just goes off frequency all together. The DG goes to FM and so fourth. So I just gave up. I only use my Scanner only to monitor the Railroads now. It works great monitoring the Railroads. But as for Law enforcement? No!

“Thier system is constantly breaking up”
“It's like the channel just goes off frequency all together”

That, my friend is a bold statement. If you look at the Washington County TRS as a whole and examine the system from an objective perspective you will find that the facts just do not support the claim that the Trunking system is moving off frequency.

To explore that statement I observe the way that the system keeps itself stable. The Washington County Trunked radio system is a Motorola simulcast Astro-25 (edited) radio system. This means that voice and control data are being transmitted simultaneously from multiple tower sites on the same frequency. This is not a simple feat. To enable a receiver to demodulate voice and data over the air the Bit Error Rate (BER) of the inbound signal must remain within a very tight tolerance. In the case of two waves that are not in perfect sync this data will be horribly corrupted and un-usable.

Two factors primarily contribute to reducing the BER to an acceptable level. The first is frequency stability. Motorola meets this simulcast requirement by employing ultra stable external oscillators tied to Quantar repeater banks. Frequency stability requirements for this application are measured in single Hertz (not KHz) and the equipment used in the Washington County exceeds the requirements for frequency stability.

The second factor is timing. If you can picture two sine (or square) waves overlapping on an oscilloscope this will make more sense. If these two waves have the same data modulated on them and are on the same frequency and are not in perfect sync then as you can imagine the receiver on the user end of the link will have an enormous BER and not be able to demodulate the data and voice.

To achieve this ultra precise timing a clock much more accurate than your wristwatch is needed. For most applications a Rubidium clock is used with multiple layers of internal redundancy and a multi layer redundant and ultra clean power supply. To further increase the long and short term accuracy and ensure that multiple tower sites are in perfect sync a GPS time hack is continuously downloaded and used to “discipline” the rubidium clock. This enables all of the tower sites in the system to maintain an extremely tight tolerance for timing, which is necessary to properly employ the system.

Getting back to the original claim that the Washington County System is moving off of frequency we can see that for this to happen the following events must occur:

-The master 5 MHz reference oscillators must fail.
-The master 5 MHz reference oscillator redundancies must fail.
Or – Connectivity with the master reference must be lost.

For the Simulcast sync to fail the system must loose its timing supplied to it through the rubidium clock which is disciplined by our GPS satellites. These clocks are designed so that they are highly reliable and are capable of informing maintainers if any failure occurs so that a repair can be made before all precision timing capabilities have been lost.
As you can see a total failure of the Washington County TRS is highly unlikely in any circumstance other than a catastrophic event or disaster. Also you must consider that the whole system is being monitored 24/7 for the slightest anomalies by sophisticated equipment that is able to detect problems before major failures occur.

So then what phenomenon could be causing the scanner to not work on the system?

Your Radio Shack Pro scanner is a complicated device however it lacks many of the hardware and software features that a fully equipped system radio has thus it has a much narrower range of tolerance for data or environmental anomalies.

If we assume that the unit is programmed correctly then there are still a few phenomenons that could be causing this failure. The unit could be in an overlap area. That means that you are receiving from two or more sites at the same time using the afore mentioned simulcast technology. Any receiver that hopes to maintain acceptable BER while in an overlap area must have a very high ‘Q’. It needs to have an ultra stable receiver and error correcting data capability.

Distance between sites also plays a role. If you live in Blair then you are probably located within relative proximity to the Blair tower. If your receiver is still able to hear a tower site that is further away at the same time then that delay between the arrival time of a specific bit and the arrival time of that exact same bit that was simulcast from the distant site may become a factor. These bits arriving at your scanner at different times then expected may be causing audio degradation and exceed the internal software’s ability for error correction.

What I’m trying to say is that there are many reasons that your scanner may have trouble with Trunking the Washington County TRS but it is more likely to be either a programming error in the scanner or a simple environmental or physical factor relating to your position as compared to the transmitting towers than a failure of the system. After all, the subscriber units are not complaining and the dispatchers seem to be able to get through to the users.

After you re-verify your program as the above posters suggest I would try taking the scanner around the county and seeing if you can increase your receive signal quality with a geographical improvement. You may be surprised with what you find!

Have fun with it!

MR_O
 
Last edited:

realgeo

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
474
Reaction score
9
Location
Murray, NE
Howdy, Mr_O!

I enjoyed reading your description of how the Washington County system operates!

However, I have a question about the following statement:

Mr_Observer said:
The Washington County Trunked radio system is a Motorola simulcast Type II radio system. This means that voice and control data are being transmitted simultaneously from multiple tower sites on the same frequency.

I wasn't aware that Motorola was still using the "Type II" identifier with their Astro-25 platforms, though!

I can understand the "Type II" reference, though, since the RF repeater system works identically to that of a simulcast analog Type II system.

Thanks for the good description. Are you involved with the management / operation of some portion of the Douglas County / Washington County / OPPD system?

73's de KC0HYI
 

Mr_Observer

Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
realgeo said:
Howdy, Mr_O!

I enjoyed reading your description of how the Washington County system operates!

However, I have a question about the following statement:



I wasn't aware that Motorola was still using the "Type II" identifier with their Astro-25 platforms, though!

I can understand the "Type II" reference, though, since the RF repeater system works identically to that of a simulcast analog Type II system.

Thanks for the good description. Are you involved with the management / operation of some portion of the Douglas County / Washington County / OPPD system?

73's de KC0HYI

You are correct the proper designation would be P25 or Astro 25. That slipped past me and I must have missed it on the edit pass. As far as the description goes that was just the Simulcast portion. The whole thing is a very sophisticated system and is pretty neat to understand. There really is allot to making something like this work.

MR_O
 

realgeo

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
474
Reaction score
9
Location
Murray, NE
Howdy, Mr_O!

Good deal! Thanks for the clarification!

I've been monitoring and "studying" the DC / WC / OPPD Astro-25 system since it was put on the air.

One thing I have been unable to figure out is OPPD's non-use of their Ponca Hills hill-top tower site.

When the system was still a Type II analog system, that site was being used quite a bit. However, as the conversion to P25 progressed, I haven't been able to detect any kind of P25 control or voice channel traffic from that site.

I realize that the Blair site probably covers the area sufficiently, but it's hard to beat the height that that tower has - it would have a good fill-in effect for both North Omaha and the Fort Calhoun areas.

One other thing I have read is that the eventual Pottawatamie County may end-up using the Ponca Hills tower as an "entry point" into the DC / WC / OPPD system. Have you heard anything to this effect?

Thanks!

George B.
 

mikeoz

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
Washington County System

BNS railfan,

We tried to warn you that the Radio Shack scanners do not work well with the CQPSK Washington County/Douglas County system. The radio just does not adjust well to the changes in modulation in this system. The Uniden Apco 25 radios BC796, BC296, BCD396T, BCD996T radios do a much better job following this system. I have tried many Pro-96 radios and Uniden radios, and the Uniden radios shine a lot better on this system.
 

realgeo

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
474
Reaction score
9
Location
Murray, NE
Howdy MikeOz!

You bring up a VERY good point. I, too, have read many a post on other bulletin boards where people complain quite loudly about the sub-par performance of RadioShack scanners on CQPSK-modulated trunking systems.

As my signature implies, I own a BCD396T, which does a FANTASTIC job with both the C4FM that the OPPD sites use, as well as the CQPSK that Douglas and Washington counties are using.

It is interesting, though - I often find the audio quality, even with the recommended "quality" adjustments I've done on my 396T, to be FAR superior on the OPPD sites, compared to the DC/WC systems.

Money-wise, the two products aren't that far apart. The reason I like my 396T is that it's portable and Uniden has now come out with a "control head" for the 396T/996T scanners!!

73's all!
 

Mr_Observer

Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
realgeo said:
Howdy, Mr_O!

Good deal! Thanks for the clarification!

I've been monitoring and "studying" the DC / WC / OPPD Astro-25 system since it was put on the air.

One thing I have been unable to figure out is OPPD's non-use of their Ponca Hills hill-top tower site.

When the system was still a Type II analog system, that site was being used quite a bit. However, as the conversion to P25 progressed, I haven't been able to detect any kind of P25 control or voice channel traffic from that site.

I realize that the Blair site probably covers the area sufficiently, but it's hard to beat the height that that tower has - it would have a good fill-in effect for both North Omaha and the Fort Calhoun areas.

One other thing I have read is that the eventual Pottawatamie County may end-up using the Ponca Hills tower as an "entry point" into the DC / WC / OPPD system. Have you heard anything to this effect?

Thanks!

George B.

My understanding is that the Pott Co system is still in the engineering phases. To decide which towers will work in a new system coverage simulations will be run using some cool software. This will help the designers decide where the best locations will be and what areas to avoid to get the best coverage.

As I typed earlier there is such a thing as too much coverage in a simulcast system the overlap areas should be kept to a minimum. Just because a tower is high doesn't necessarily make it a good choice for use with a TRS. Geography and position in relation to the other sites must be accounted for.

And that's BEFORE politics get involved.

MR_O
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
111
Location
Virginia
Mr_Observer said:
My understanding is that the Pott Co system is still in the engineering phases. To decide which towers will work in a new system coverage simulations will be run using some cool software. This will help the designers decide where the best locations will be and what areas to avoid to get the best coverage.

As I typed earlier there is such a thing as too much coverage in a simulcast system the overlap areas should be kept to a minimum. Just because a tower is high doesn't necessarily make it a good choice for use with a TRS. Geography and position in relation to the other sites must be accounted for.

And that's BEFORE politics get involved.

MR_O

In August of last I was told that Pot county construction was going to start shortly after Washington county sites were complete and operational. They more than likely have started construction on Pot counties' sites. Pot county probably has a lot more sites than Douglas county and Washington Couny.
 

NeFire242

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
6
Location
Nebraska
He should bring his scanner to one of those scanner meetings they have in Omaha to make sure its programmed up right and that if set side by side to another scanner if any of them are able to hear the system and he just doesn't have a bad scanner.
 

NeFire242

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
6
Location
Nebraska
Mr_Observer said:
“Thier system is constantly breaking up”
“It's like the channel just goes off frequency all together”

That, my friend is a bold statement. If you look at the Washington County TRS as a whole and examine the system from an objective perspective you will find that the facts just do not support the claim that the Trunking system is moving off frequency.

To explore that statement I observe the way that the system keeps itself stable. The Washington County Trunked radio system is a Motorola simulcast Astro-25 (edited) radio system. This means that voice and control data are being transmitted simultaneously from multiple tower sites on the same frequency. This is not a simple feat. To enable a receiver to demodulate voice and data over the air the Bit Error Rate (BER) of the inbound signal must remain within a very tight tolerance. In the case of two waves that are not in perfect sync this data will be horribly corrupted and un-usable.

Two factors primarily contribute to reducing the BER to an acceptable level. The first is frequency stability. Motorola meets this simulcast requirement by employing ultra stable external oscillators tied to Quantar repeater banks. Frequency stability requirements for this application are measured in single Hertz (not KHz) and the equipment used in the Washington County exceeds the requirements for frequency stability.

The second factor is timing. If you can picture two sine (or square) waves overlapping on an oscilloscope this will make more sense. If these two waves have the same data modulated on them and are on the same frequency and are not in perfect sync then as you can imagine the receiver on the user end of the link will have an enormous BER and not be able to demodulate the data and voice.

To achieve this ultra precise timing a clock much more accurate than your wristwatch is needed. For most applications a Rubidium clock is used with multiple layers of internal redundancy and a multi layer redundant and ultra clean power supply. To further increase the long and short term accuracy and ensure that multiple tower sites are in perfect sync a GPS time hack is continuously downloaded and used to “discipline” the rubidium clock. This enables all of the tower sites in the system to maintain an extremely tight tolerance for timing, which is necessary to properly employ the system.

Getting back to the original claim that the Washington County System is moving off of frequency we can see that for this to happen the following events must occur:

-The master 5 MHz reference oscillators must fail.
-The master 5 MHz reference oscillator redundancies must fail.
Or – Connectivity with the master reference must be lost.

For the Simulcast sync to fail the system must loose its timing supplied to it through the rubidium clock which is disciplined by our GPS satellites. These clocks are designed so that they are highly reliable and are capable of informing maintainers if any failure occurs so that a repair can be made before all precision timing capabilities have been lost.
As you can see a total failure of the Washington County TRS is highly unlikely in any circumstance other than a catastrophic event or disaster. Also you must consider that the whole system is being monitored 24/7 for the slightest anomalies by sophisticated equipment that is able to detect problems before major failures occur.

So then what phenomenon could be causing the scanner to not work on the system?

Your Radio Shack Pro scanner is a complicated device however it lacks many of the hardware and software features that a fully equipped system radio has thus it has a much narrower range of tolerance for data or environmental anomalies.

If we assume that the unit is programmed correctly then there are still a few phenomenons that could be causing this failure. The unit could be in an overlap area. That means that you are receiving from two or more sites at the same time using the afore mentioned simulcast technology. Any receiver that hopes to maintain acceptable BER while in an overlap area must have a very high ‘Q’. It needs to have an ultra stable receiver and error correcting data capability.

Distance between sites also plays a role. If you live in Blair then you are probably located within relative proximity to the Blair tower. If your receiver is still able to hear a tower site that is further away at the same time then that delay between the arrival time of a specific bit and the arrival time of that exact same bit that was simulcast from the distant site may become a factor. These bits arriving at your scanner at different times then expected may be causing audio degradation and exceed the internal software’s ability for error correction.

What I’m trying to say is that there are many reasons that your scanner may have trouble with Trunking the Washington County TRS but it is more likely to be either a programming error in the scanner or a simple environmental or physical factor relating to your position as compared to the transmitting towers than a failure of the system. After all, the subscriber units are not complaining and the dispatchers seem to be able to get through to the users.

After you re-verify your program as the above posters suggest I would try taking the scanner around the county and seeing if you can increase your receive signal quality with a geographical improvement. You may be surprised with what you find!

Have fun with it!

MR_O

Let me guess, you're single right?
 

Mr_Observer

Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
NeFire242 said:
Let me guess, you're single right?

So are you telling me that a domestic partner will in some way impede ones ability to comprehensively understand the finer points of RF equipment and radio physics?

In all honesty unless you are a smoking hot chick I consider that like of questioning to be altogether irrelevant. Heh heh.....

MR_O
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top