I think internet backed modes present an interesting thought experiment for exploring what you value about the hobby.
For example, if I get on an HT and talk to a repeater, there's other radios in the mix receiving and rebroadcasting me in real time. The broadcast radio is physically right next to the input system, but there's a conceptual separation between the two. I'm fine with that, it still feels "real" to me.
Okay, so what about the linked repeater system we have here in NC, the C440 network? I can get on that to talk to people on repeaters I'd never be able normally because physics, and it's happening because of linked UHF repeaters. (they also have setups for connecting to digital modes but setting those aside for now). It still feels "real" to me, even though major portions of the transmission path have nothing to do with my own radio.
So, internet-backed digital modes, they're really not that different from the user's perspective. You have an expensive device that you talk into and it connects to other devices and lets other people talk back to you. So why does it feel different?
I think for me, what makes the difference is knowing all the pain in the ass work that goes into building and maintaining a repeater system. There's something satisfying about knowing that I'm interacting with systems that had to be created - maintained, built, funded, etc - with nontrivial effort. If all I wanted to do was just talk to someone, we have phones and the internet, I have internet friends in Europe and Canada I can call on Discord with better fidelity than I'd ever get with a radio. What I like about the hobby is the collective tinkering aspect and the challenge of overcoming things with minimal resources, and going over the internet feels too easy for me.
Maybe I'm just hopelessly romantic.