Allan_Love_Jr
Member
Very good video. And it does have a very good point.
Why you need a CB!
YouTube - Why You Need A CB!
Why you need a CB!
YouTube - Why You Need A CB!
Very good video. And it does have a very good point.
Why you need a CB!
YouTube - Why You Need A CB!
The negatives of CB radio...
CB band would be overwhelmed with traffic, and become unusable.
CB radio would be destroyed in the event of an EMP bomb.
CB radio could give away your location to the military, or roving gangs looking for food and other resources.
CB radio could be jammed by the military.
CB radio has relatively high current demands, shortening battery life.
CB radio requires large antennas to be effective.
CB radio does not work well around structures.
CB hand-held radios are larger and heavier compared to FRS/GMRS/MURS alternatives.
LMAO That's funny. I wish that some people came with a Squelch switch.Always wondered how that squelch thing worked.![]()
Number one thing. Your wrong on alot of your answers. CB Radio's do not drain your Battery. I have been into the CB Radio for well over 15 years and have not one once had that problem. Number two. CB signal's in large city's still will work just fine. In Omaha I don't have that problem. And they have tall structures. Number three. Yes. The Military can block "ALL" radio signal's. But right now they have bigger fish to fry like trying to keep this country safe from another attack. As for the Antenna. CB Radio needs a high Antenna because of the type of Frequency that it runs on. I like my big Antenna. You said "CB band would be overwhelmed with traffic, and become unusable". Yes that is true. But only in the bigger city's. Not in the country. And besides. There are not that many CB's out there to cause that much of a problem as right now. And a nuclear attack can and very will knock out "ALL" radio communication's. So. Your wrong on your part on some of your answers.The negatives of CB radio...
CB band would be overwhelmed with traffic, and become unusable.
CB radio would be destroyed in the event of an EMP bomb.
CB radio could give away your location to the military, or roving gangs looking for food and other resources.
CB radio could be jammed by the military.
CB radio has relatively high current demands, shortening battery life.
CB radio requires large antennas to be effective.
CB radio does not work well around structures.
CB hand-held radios are larger and heavier compared to FRS/GMRS/MURS alternatives.
....... The electronics the usaf used in the 1950's during nuclear testing were all using vaccum tubes in that era. How do you think they were still able to communicate? Not on their blackberrys,lol!
That brings back some old memories. F-84Fs of my squadron were used during operation Teapot in early 1955. I don’t think these aircraft were subjected to EMP but they did fly through the nuclear cloud after the EMP would have been over with.
And don't forget all the well cook Ham's !This is true. IF after the initial blast we are still around...then we can all sit around and argue about why our cb's don't work in the CANDLE light,lol! cb's ARE going to be the LEAST of our problems!!!
N9ZAS
Number one thing. Your wrong on alot of your answers. CB Radio's do not drain your Battery. I have been into the CB Radio for well over 15 years and have not one once had that problem. Number two. CB signal's in large city's still will work just fine. In Omaha I don't have that problem. And they have tall structures. Number three. Yes. The Military can block "ALL" radio signal's. But right now they have bigger fish to fry like trying to keep this country safe from another attack. As for the Antenna. CB Radio needs a high Antenna because of the type of Frequency that it runs on. I like my big Antenna. You said "CB band would be overwhelmed with traffic, and become unusable". Yes that is true. But only in the bigger city's. Not in the country. And besides. There are not that many CB's out there to cause that much of a problem as right now. And a nuclear attack can and very will knock out "ALL" radio communication's. So. Your wrong on your part on some of your answers.