• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Antenna Spacing

tush

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
4
Location
Jefferson Iowa
Ok, I have tried to search this and either Im blind, or I am searching the wrong thing. If I place 2 antennas on a tower (GMRS Band) one for TX, mounted at the top of my mast, and a RX mounted below. What is the spacing to avoid over powering the receiver when transmitted? I have seen everything for 1/4 wave to 100 Foot. So the information is a little foggy. Yes a filter would be best, but I am finding it hard to find one for these frequencies. Any Ideas?
 

tweiss3

Is it time for Coffee?
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
1,081
Location
Ohio
The minimum performance for a UHF duplexer is 70db isolation. To meet that isolation with vertical separation (one antenna directly over the other one), the minimum space from top of the bottom antenna to the bottom of the top antenna is 30', and that increases if they are not perfectly one over the other.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,056
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
It depends of the antennas radiation pattern, how much signal it actually will spread between antennas. It also depends of the receiver. With a good receiver I can input 1W and receiver sensitivity or intermod handling doesn't flinch. That would be impossible with a scanner type of receiver or most portable and many mobile 2-way radios. Even base station receivers can sometimes not be good enough to handle strong signals.

/Ubbe
 

tush

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
4
Location
Jefferson Iowa
So as I only have 35' to play with, Running a local repeater in simplex would be the simpler option? At least until I can set aside the finances to get a duplexer.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,385
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Its common on commercial towers to have about 20ft minimum spacing where the top section of the tower is reserved for receive only antennas then starting about 20ft below the transmit and full duplex antennas are installed. However you need much more than just antenna spacing and at the very least a 1/4 wave band pass cavity on both the transmit and receive path, not to mention an isolator on the transmitter.

A cheaper 4" band pass cavity at UHF will be down about 15dB at 5MHz spacing so one on the transmit side and another on the receive side will get you about 30dB isolation. My goal would be a good 85dB isolation for a 50w repeater so that would be looking at antenna spacing to give you the remaining 55dB which is unlikely. Instead I would look for 8" cavities which will be down about 27dB at 5MHz with a pair giving about 54dB of isolation. That will leave about 31dB isolation from vertical antenna spacing to achieve 85dB which is more realistic.
 
Top