He is not testing them right despite his claim other are not. My tests and those by others show that. His video shows he *really* does not know what he is doing with the AirSpy. He makes no mention of using decimation in SDRsharp to increase dynamic range making his appraisal at best inept. My tests and those of the World Radio television Handbook both say the AirSpy HF+ Discovery has better dynamic range contrary to his unsubstantiated claims. He needs to show what software he is using and the setting--I strongly suspect he does not know what he needs to do to get the best performance from the AirSpy HF+ Discovery. Calling AirSpy unfair is garbage. Note the end of the video. He clearly resents AirSpy by controlling the software they wrote. He is one of a group he continuous attack AirSpy as they do not like the software writen by the company for its own product controlling which hardware can use it. It is true the company acts somewhat arrogant but their product is great.
(20123 WRTH gives the following:
Airspy HF+ Discovery SEL ***** DR ***** OV *****
SDR Play RSP1A SEL **** DR **** OV ****
and I would agree.)
Note how he does not even show an actual test in the video.
See also the post by rlwsdr in
In a previous post we posted about how SDR# had been updated to vastly improve on the CPU usage. The author has been hard at work once again, and has now released a new update which significantly improves the dynamic range with the Airspy SDR. The new update gives a boost of up to 12dB in...
www.rtl-sdr.com