It's easy to get on a bandwagon when only one side is known.
Here is the other side:
The customer had an issue. An RMA was assigned but apparently never received by the customer. We had no way to know this.
Our point of view: The RMA was issued, sent in, and they were waiting for repair/replacement and return.
The customer's point of view: They are waiting for the RMA info.
It's easy to see where communication broke down.
When they asked about the status of their return, we informed them that
processing RMAs was behind (and we fully admit this is the case - we are far behind on them but we are catching up).
The customer never mentioned that they had not received the RMA info. We simply assumed they were asking about the status of the return.
When we finally determined that they never got the RMA info, it was re-issued, obviously received, and they sent the unit in.
Within one week they filed a PayPal claim. We immediately refunded the customer.
So it was all miscommunication that was not realized on the part of both parties.
The customer blames us for not fully understanding their side, but misunderstandings happen. When neither side catches that it can drag out because each side only sees their point of view. Again, as soon as we realized the miscommunication we acted upon that and acted upon the refund immediately. We also informed the customer of the misunderstanding, but they said it was not acceptable that we had not understood them completely. We did not argue that point, as it would only have further broken down the communication of an already bad situation.
This simple misunderstanding need not be made into any larger conspiracy.
Please understand that we do not have a full time tech. We don't even have enough RMAs to consider hiring one part time, and the truth is you will never get anyone good to work part time. Our tech is very good at his job (he has a normal 40+ hour/week job elsewhere) but we have to coordinate schedules when he is available and when we are. This is not easy sometimes. We were never meant to be a repair center, but did that at the request of Airspy. We have considered simply letting the factory handle RMAs. We would welcome any feedback on that idea, but the truth is we do not check here often. We believe that was pointed out above. So any feedback can be submitted via our website. It is probably a RR violation to mention that in this thread, as they considered it a violation to mention it in our website in our footer because we are a business, but the website is easy enough to find.
Thank you for your time.