The other day a YouTube video came on my feed from one of the bigger SW channels and I decided I’ve been doing DX-ing all wrong.* Apparently the right way to do it is to show your receiver tuned to a frequency with audio of noise. Then you tune up and then down a couple of kHz until the noise stops and back to the noise and say: “Yes, it’s faint but it’s definitely there. That’s a Russian-Chinese-North Korean jammer number time station broadcasting from Moldova that’s only on every other Friday from 1500-1510 UTC.”
So, to each his own I guess, lol. My style is similar to an extent, but a little different. I enjoy searching for 1. SW signals from distant lands, and 2. Interesting programming.
If a signal from the other side of the world is just barely there, but not listenable, I’m mildly interested, but only briefly. And 3. Out of nostalgia for my youth, I also enjoy trying to catch distant AM stations from here in the US and Canada.
Actually, if you look up what DX-ing is, the first way I described is actually pretty accurate. Looking for distant and often weak signals. I guess where I differ is that I get bored quickly if a signal is not “listenable.”
*Note: this post is mostly serious, but with a bit of humor mixed in. 🙂
So, to each his own I guess, lol. My style is similar to an extent, but a little different. I enjoy searching for 1. SW signals from distant lands, and 2. Interesting programming.
If a signal from the other side of the world is just barely there, but not listenable, I’m mildly interested, but only briefly. And 3. Out of nostalgia for my youth, I also enjoy trying to catch distant AM stations from here in the US and Canada.
Actually, if you look up what DX-ing is, the first way I described is actually pretty accurate. Looking for distant and often weak signals. I guess where I differ is that I get bored quickly if a signal is not “listenable.”
*Note: this post is mostly serious, but with a bit of humor mixed in. 🙂