Heard from a friend in LE, I can't confirm:
Rumors/hearsay don't really mean much. I'm not defending AT&T/FN, but I'll point out some issues with these sorts of statements:
FirstNet is a joke.. no coverage in many parts of the USA.. I was on a committee in Macomb county and FirstNet had us draw in where there was lack of coverage.. their infrastructure is poor.. my nephew worked for a company that maintained their equipment at al the towers...all crap.. no generators..
FirstNet is still being built out, so saying "no coverage" doesn't mean much. Plan is to cover something like 95% of the population. I'm not aware there was ever a plan to cover all the land area, that's just not possible, not with any terrestrial carrier.
If there is AT&T coverage, there is FirstNet coverage.
Verizon ALL had generators and better equipment..
Verizon may very well have more sites with generators, but I can assure you it's not "ALL" sites. I have a number of Verizon sites at work that do not have generators at them. I have one site that a generator was not feasible, so they have a hydrogen fuel cell plant.
AT&T doesn't have generators at many of their sites, but that's starting to change. We complained about one of the sites, so they brought in a trailered generator and left it hooked up at the site. If your friends agency isn't getting the service they need, they may not be asking the right people.
And generators are not the only solution. The requirements are to provide a certain amount of run time when utility power fails. There isn't a requirement to specifically have a generator on site. Like I said above, I've got one site that has a hydrogen fuel cell. I know of others that just upped their battery plant to run the site longer. Others have large solar farms, wind generators, lots of solutions.
Generators are really nice to have, but they do not have endless fuel supplies. Sites with generators need to be refueled, and access can be impossible in some areas. Doesn't matter the carrier. In a big enough disaster (think: some of the large hurricanes we've had), the fueling contractors could not keep up, were physically being hijacked, or could not access the site. A generator that has run out of fuel isn't very helpful...
As for "better equipment", it would be interesting to know how someone in "LE" is aware of that, and what their experience level is. Cellular equipment is locked in cabinet and/or enclosures/huts, so unlikely they would have free access, even if they knew what they were looking at. I've found that most people have no idea what they are looking at when they look at a cell tower. Unless they have climbed up the tower, they would not be able to see enough detail to pass judgement
The equipment at the tower/enclosure is just the RF gear. The switching and LTE cores are elsewhere. It would be impossible to judge the quality of the MSO/Core from just looking at a cell site.
Macomb and Oakland counties made the decision NOT to switch anything to AT&T but to stay with Verizon.. I think the state of MI will also continue to use VZ - better coverage in MI except in the UP at&t has a slight lead..
That's fine, there is absolutely no requirement that any agency use FirstNet.
Verizon had the opportunity to bid on the NPSBN contract, but they chose not to. After the fact, they decided to build out essentially the same product using their existing infrastructure. They do not have a dedicated band for it, but they do pretty well using what they have.
There have been many agencies trying to get Verizon and FirstNet to link their LTE cores to allow better interoperability, but so far AT&T has refused to do this.
In some areas, Verizon has absolutely better coverage and if an agency or individual frequents one of those areas, then utilizing Verizon makes a heck of a lot of sense. If an agency or individual is in an area that enjoys better coverage from AT&T/FN, then that would be the better solution.
It's not a game to see who's brand is better. If an agency needs LTE coverage, then they should pick which ever carrier gives them what they need.
Most of the Cradlepoint type devices using by agencies allows more than one SIM card. It's not out of the ordinary for an agency to have a FirstNet SIM card as well as a second carrier to make the best use of what's available.