• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Base antenna coax length

Status
Not open for further replies.

Josh380

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
328
Reaction score
13
Location
Orange County, CA
So, on suggestion from a friend and ham operator, I'm building a basic dipole antenna which will go up in the attic of my house (HOA). There is no aluminum sheeting between the attic and the shingles. The shingles are not the heavy thick shingles, but more like the ones that look similar to sandpaper.

His suggested design involves this dipole "centre" here and two 102" steel whips. This should eliminate the need for tuning, making for a relatively easy install.

I have a great match on my truck..nearly flat from 26.5-28 MHz, 18 FT. of LMR 200 Coax. My base setup would involve LMR 400. I've heard 18 Ft. is typically the best coax length, and I know there are calculators out there for this stuff, how much further could I make my run should I need to, without going above SWR tolerances? Ideally the antenna will be mounted just above the radio in the attic, to allow for the shortest possible run.

For reference I'm runnning an RCI 2970N2, with an Astron 75A supply.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
13,676
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
9ft steel whips are expensive these days and with shipping you can easily pay $60 for just one. Since this is for your attic I think copper wire would be a much better and cheaper way to go. You don't even need a dipole "center", just split off the center conductor and braid and head the copper wire out in two different directions. $3 in parts and you can make a fine dipole.

On the coax length, there is no magic length. Use the least amount you need to reach the radio and use the lowest loss you can afford. I would also recommend using a ferrite type choke balun at the feed point to decouple the antenna from the coax. For about $10 you can get an FT-240-61 ferrite toroid and wrap 12 turns of your coax through it and have a fantastic performing choke for 27MHz.

So, on suggestion from a friend and ham operator, I'm building a basic dipole antenna which will go up in the attic of my house (HOA). There is no aluminum sheeting between the attic and the shingles. The shingles are not the heavy thick shingles, but more like the ones that look similar to sandpaper.

His suggested design involves this dipole "centre" here and two 102" steel whips. This should eliminate the need for tuning, making for a relatively easy install.

I have a great match on my truck..nearly flat from 26.5-28 MHz, 18 FT. of LMR 200 Coax. My base setup would involve LMR 400. I've heard 18 Ft. is typically the best coax length, and I know there are calculators out there for this stuff, how much further could I make my run should I need to, without going above SWR tolerances? Ideally the antenna will be mounted just above the radio in the attic, to allow for the shortest possible run.

For reference I'm runnning an RCI 2970N2, with an Astron 75A supply.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,692
Reaction score
33,976
Location
United States
I have a great match on my truck..nearly flat from 26.5-28 MHz, 18 FT. of LMR 200 Coax. My base setup would involve LMR 400. I've heard 18 Ft. is typically the best coax length, and I know there are calculators out there for this stuff, how much further could I make my run should I need to, without going above SWR tolerances? Ideally the antenna will be mounted just above the radio in the attic, to allow for the shortest possible run.

The 'best' coax length is what ever is the shortest possible length between your radio and your antenna.

The "tuned lengths" of coax only serve to hide antenna tuning issues. They do not make the antenna work better. If your antenna is designed, installed and tuned correctly, the amount of coax between the radio and antenna is irrelevant. In fact, running more coax than necessary to connect the radio to the antenna results in more signal loss. That signal loss can be negligible on shorter runs and with better cable, but it can be significant on longer runs and cheaper cable.
And that loss works in both directions. It'll reduce the amount of power that makes it from your radio to your antenna, and it'll reduce the amount of received signal that makes it from the antenna to your radio.


His suggested design involves this dipole "centre" here and two 102" steel whips. This should eliminate the need for tuning, making for a relatively easy install.

102" on it's own may be too short. Usually those 102" whips were designed to use a 6" tall spring at the base. 108" is usually more likely to give you a better SWR on CB frequencies.
But wire is easier to tune. Difficult to cut stainless whips. Make it out of wire, keep them a few inches long, and trim for lowest SWR.
 

Josh380

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
328
Reaction score
13
Location
Orange County, CA
9ft steel whips are expensive these days and with shipping you can easily pay $60 for just one. Since this is for your attic I think copper wire would be a much better and cheaper way to go. You don't even need a dipole "center", just split off the center conductor and braid and head the copper wire out in two different directions. $3 in parts and you can make a fine dipole.

On the coax length, there is no magic length. Use the least amount you need to reach the radio and use the lowest loss you can afford. I would also recommend using a ferrite type choke balun at the feed point to decouple the antenna from the coax.

I actually picked up two 102" whips from a CB shop semi-local to me, for $35 each. Dipole "centre" already ordered and should be 50 Ohms. No balun needed. Since this will be a T Dipole, I imagine the antenna will be much lower than the peak of the roof. I don't imagine I'll need more than 18ft.

Mmckenna:

I've heard of using springs..I didn't use one on my truck and my friends antenna analyzer has me at 1.2 between the above frequencies. Not bad IMO. If using a spring will get me lower than that, then I might consider it.

Unfortunately, everything has already been purchased. I've had quite a bit of LMR 400 laying around for awhile, so I plan on putting it back into service.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,692
Reaction score
33,976
Location
United States
Mmckenna:

I've heard of using springs..I didn't use one on my truck and my friends antenna analyzer has me at 1.2 between the above frequencies. Not bad IMO. If using a spring will get me lower than that, then I might consider it.

Unfortunately, everything has already been purchased. I've had quite a bit of LMR 400 laying around for awhile, so I plan on putting it back into service.

If you are using a tuned length of coax between your CB and antenna, as in the 18' you mentioned, any SWR reading done from the radio end is just going to show the cumulative effects of the antenna + the possible effects of the coax. Try it again with a random length of coax and see what it shows. Might still show 1.2:1, or may likely show something different. Ideally you want the antenna tuned for lowest SWR, not the coax.
 

Josh380

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
328
Reaction score
13
Location
Orange County, CA
If you are using a tuned length of coax between your CB and antenna, as in the 18' you mentioned, any SWR reading done from the radio end is just going to show the cumulative effects of the antenna + the possible effects of the coax. Try it again with a random length of coax and see what it shows. Might still show 1.2:1, or may likely show something different. Ideally you want the antenna tuned for lowest SWR, not the coax.

Ok. Good advice. Thanks.

I have a NanoVNA. Still trying to learn how to use it correctly, though. Seems kind of difficult.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,692
Reaction score
33,976
Location
United States
Ok. Good advice. Thanks.

I have a NanoVNA. Still trying to learn how to use it correctly, though. Seems kind of difficult.


Yeah, I've got one too. I also have access to high end stuff at work. Even though I've been using the commercial stuff for years and understand it pretty well, the NanoVNA's took some work to learn. Still not comfortable with them. There's some good tutorials on The Youtubes, and some not so good ones.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
13,676
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
A balun is not needed but its a really good idea. You are building an unbalanced dipole antenna where one of the elements connects directly to the coax shield. The coax shield can and probably will be part of the antenna and it can radiate and also bring noise up the coax from other things in the house introducing interference to your reception. A choke balun will isolate the coax shield from the antenna and prevent hot coax and other problems. Its a just a good way to do business.

`
I actually picked up two 102" whips from a CB shop semi-local to me, for $35 each. Dipole "centre" already ordered and should be 50 Ohms. No balun needed. Since this will be a T Dipole, I imagine the antenna will be much lower than the peak of the roof. I don't imagine I'll need more than 18ft.
 

Josh380

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
328
Reaction score
13
Location
Orange County, CA
A balun is not needed but its a really good idea. You are building an unbalanced dipole antenna where one of the elements connects directly to the coax shield. The coax shield can and probably will be part of the antenna and it can radiate and also bring noise up the coax from other things in the house introducing interference to your reception. A choke balun will isolate the coax shield from the antenna and prevent hot coax and other problems. Its a just a good way to do business.

`

Ok thanks. Ordered an MFJ-915. So this is to be connected at the antenna, correct?
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
13,676
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Yes at the antenna. The $10 ferrite core I mentioned earlier will work much better than the MFJ-915 for CB use. At best the MFJ is good for about 20dB isolation where you should get over 30dB with 12 turns of coax through an FT-240-61 core. Great performance is not about $$, its about knowing the best practice.

Ok thanks. Ordered an MFJ-915. So this is to be connected at the antenna, correct?
 

Josh380

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
328
Reaction score
13
Location
Orange County, CA
Yes at the antenna. The $10 ferrite core I mentioned earlier will work much better than the MFJ-915 for CB use. At best the MFJ is good for about 20dB isolation where you should get over 30dB with 12 turns of coax through an FT-240-61 core. Great performance is not about $$, its about knowing the best practice.
Yeah but 12 turns with LMR 400 is not my idea of fun. Using what I have to work with to a degree.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
295
Reaction score
340
You are building an unbalanced dipole antenna

Close... a diapole = two identical length radiators = Balanced (BAL in Balun) to coax which happens to be Unbalanced (UN in Balun) so therefore a balun is used to marry a balanced load to a unbalanced source and vice versa...

Yeah but 12 turns with LMR 400 is not my idea of fun

You could go with RG8x or equivalent to make the turns then barrel connector into your LMR400...
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
13,676
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
$10 ferrite core, 10ft of LMR240 or RG-142 coax, a male and female connector and for maybe $20 you have a choke that is vastly superior to the MFJ.

And the best part is when one of your friends is in the same position needing a choke balun, you can say, "a $10 ferrite core, 10ft of coax and a couple of connectors, maybe $20 tops and your done. Been there, done that...."

Yeah but 12 turns with LMR 400 is not my idea of fun. Using what I have to work with to a degree.
 

FPR1981

Active Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
621
Reaction score
520
9ft steel whips are expensive these days and with shipping you can easily pay $60 for just one. Since this is for your attic I think copper wire would be a much better and cheaper way to go. You don't even need a dipole "center", just split off the center conductor and braid and head the copper wire out in two different directions. $3 in parts and you can make a fine dipole.

On the coax length, there is no magic length. Use the least amount you need to reach the radio and use the lowest loss you can afford. I would also recommend using a ferrite type choke balun at the feed point to decouple the antenna from the coax. For about $10 you can get an FT-240-61 ferrite toroid and wrap 12 turns of your coax through it and have a fantastic performing choke for 27MHz.

I agree with this. I build kickass dipole antennas using dual 16 gauge copper lamp cord from the local hardware store. You're wasting your money using steel. That's cost prohibitive IMHO. And I agree with PRC. I build 2 to 3 dipoles a week for people and do not use a "centre." I usually do a direct wire solder job, coat it with hot glue, wrap it with electrical tape and be done with it. Works great.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
13,676
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Indoors you can get away with almost anything, no weatherproofing to worry about, bare connections ok, no wind to wiggle things, etc.

I agree with this. I build kickass dipole antennas using dual 16 gauge copper lamp cord from the local hardware store. You're wasting your money using steel. That's cost prohibitive IMHO. And I agree with PRC. I build 2 to 3 dipoles a week for people and do not use a "centre." I usually do a direct wire solder job, coat it with hot glue, wrap it with electrical tape and be done with it. Works great.
 

FPR1981

Active Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
621
Reaction score
520
Indoors you can get away with almost anything, no weatherproofing to worry about, bare connections ok, no wind to wiggle things, etc.

This one I built out of dual 18 gauge speaker wire and featured in an earlier video. It does have a center. It was from a Workman BS-1 dipole. But I checked the SWR last night after months in an Ohio winter, and she's holding very steady.


This was the video of the antenna build/install

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top