Dawn
Member
Do any of you own CB specific test equipment? I'm not talking about swr meter/requency counter units, but real lab test equipment. Most of it was made during the boom years for a short period of time. Communications test equipment for commercial services doesn't really qualify as most of it didn't include AM or if it did, it was an afterthought. Short of aviation test equipment and broadcast, very little was made for AM during the past 45 years.
While I own 2 HP/Agilent service monitors and an array of commercial communications test equipment, a lot of it isn't really usable for AM. I do own a B&K 1040 and 2040 set and have worked with the old Hicock test system that wasn't really for service as much as it was for window dressing for dealers during the 70's. I do have a Sencore CB-41 mod/power meter. Their CB-42 doesn't seem as useful as their mobile CB-49 which is mostly analog. Leader and Meguro were the only other companies that I know of that made CB test equipment. Meguro tended to be very rare and only part of factory/distributor standard test equipment, so it's not very likely anyone has come across it. Leader's few pieces were only made about 2 years and is equally as rare. Sencore's prices and the requirment for a second phone for a repair station left most consumer repair stations out and communications repair wouldn't bother with the low repair costs and rates that were about 1/3 of professional repair fees.
Based on what I already own, I can appreciate owning a Sencore CB-49 mobile test set due to it's entirely analog. I wouldn't mind owning one of Hicock's synthesized generators even though my HP's would be capable of doing the same, these units would be more convenient rather then dealing with the limitations of the B&K 2040. Even the B&K 1040 has limitations today with modulation unless it's displayed on a scope. Hickok and Sencore depended too much on digital displays too early when the empahsis should have been on analog. No easy answers here. Even with the best communications test sets or test equipment, you still would have had to rely on obsolete equipment or amateur pressed into servicel
While I own 2 HP/Agilent service monitors and an array of commercial communications test equipment, a lot of it isn't really usable for AM. I do own a B&K 1040 and 2040 set and have worked with the old Hicock test system that wasn't really for service as much as it was for window dressing for dealers during the 70's. I do have a Sencore CB-41 mod/power meter. Their CB-42 doesn't seem as useful as their mobile CB-49 which is mostly analog. Leader and Meguro were the only other companies that I know of that made CB test equipment. Meguro tended to be very rare and only part of factory/distributor standard test equipment, so it's not very likely anyone has come across it. Leader's few pieces were only made about 2 years and is equally as rare. Sencore's prices and the requirment for a second phone for a repair station left most consumer repair stations out and communications repair wouldn't bother with the low repair costs and rates that were about 1/3 of professional repair fees.
Based on what I already own, I can appreciate owning a Sencore CB-49 mobile test set due to it's entirely analog. I wouldn't mind owning one of Hicock's synthesized generators even though my HP's would be capable of doing the same, these units would be more convenient rather then dealing with the limitations of the B&K 2040. Even the B&K 1040 has limitations today with modulation unless it's displayed on a scope. Hickok and Sencore depended too much on digital displays too early when the empahsis should have been on analog. No easy answers here. Even with the best communications test sets or test equipment, you still would have had to rely on obsolete equipment or amateur pressed into servicel