choosing a uniden scanner

Akuriko

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
399
Location
Friday Harbor,Washington , in the San Juan Islands
So my father-in-law bought an SDS 100 and SDS 200 for his area in Cleveland, my brother was looking at the BCD325P2 or the BCD996P2, I told him the best for Ingham and Eaton counties is the SDS 100 or SDS 200, before I give him bad advise will the 325P2 or the 996P2 work for his needs or should he spend the extra funds for the SDS 100 or SDS 200?
 

tvengr

Well Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
9,298
Location
Baltimore County, MD
my brother was looking at the BCD325P2 or the BCD996P2, I told him the best for Ingham and Eaton counties is the SDS 100 or SDS 200
Eaton and Ingham Counties both use simulcast sites (MPSCS statewide system). Any scanner other than the SDS100 and SDS200 may or may not work depending upon his location. The SDS100 and SDS200 are the only scanners specifically designed to receive simulcast systems. At my home, the SDS100 and SDS200 are the only scanners that will receive the Baltimore County simulcast system. All other scanners fail miserably including the BCD325P2, BCD996P2, BCD436HP, and BCD536HP. The SDS scanners are definitely the best choice for the Lansing area.
 

just1bob

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
49
Location
Wayland, Michigan
My home patrol 2 also works good in the Lansing area also. A lot depends on your specific location. If you get a new scanner to try just make sure you can return it easily…just in case. I went through 3 great scanners before I found one that works for me.
 

hiegtx

Mentor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
11,193
Location
Dallas, TX
so what would work for Lansing Michigan then?
The key is really your location, relative to the subsites (transmit towers) in the simulcast site.
My home patrol 2 also works good in the Lansing area also. A lot depends on your specific location. If you get a new scanner to try just make sure you can return it easily…just in case. I went through 3 great scanners before I found one that works for me.
In your case, one of the simulcast site towers is practically in your back yard. If you are close to one of the towers, the strong signal overrides the weaker, out of sync, signals from transmit towers much farther away.
1665358243384.png
Your location, Wayland, is somewhat hidden under the pin for the specific site. I circled it.

But someone else in your vicinity, in roughly the middle of the county, would likely get hammered with out of sync signals from elsewhere.
 

hiegtx

Mentor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
11,193
Location
Dallas, TX
Thanks i will show my brother this, i been asked if i wanted a Whistler TRX-2 as a gift from my room mate, whats the difference between TRX-2 and my 536 or 436? i think i am happier with my 536 and 436.
The TRX-2 is Whistler's top of the line base/mobile. (The hand=held is the TRX-1.)

The TRX-1 & -2 are terrible choices in heavy simulcast areas. Their performance is well below that of the 436HP & 536HP. If you were in an area without simulcast, and mostly conventional channels, they will work, but Whistler scanners, derived from the original GRE design, tend to overload if in a dense radio traffic area (such as a major metro area). If you were in a semi-rural area, no simulcast, they may work well for you. One thing the TRX-2 has is that you can mount the display, say, on your dash, and it connects to the rest of the scanner, which you might mount under the seat, or elsewhere that's non-intrusive. It has a cable to connect the remote head & the main body of the scanner.

Unless you just have your heart set on the remote head in your vehicle, and you do not have any simulcast systems to deal with, I think you'd be better off with the 536HP. While the x36HP scanners are not bulletproof in dealing with simulcast, they are better than the Uniden P2 series scanners & the TRX-1/TRX-2. Of course, in heavy simulcast areas, you'd be better off with one of the SDS series scanners, a Unication pager, or one of the Blue Tail receivers. If I recall, you are not in the middle of a major metro area; is that correct?

I don't have the TRX-2, but do have the TRX-1. I do like it's solid feel in my hands, but I can't really use it for simulcast systems, of which there are many in my area. I generally load the TRX with a set of conventional channels, and leave it running to record frequencies that are not currently in the database, to get an idea what they are being used for.
 
Top