Since RFinder has taken over the repeater databases for the ARRL many state / county coordinator are no longer publishing repeater coordination.
The notice you found on the OARC website is old news. When the ARRL contracted with RFinder to manage the database for the ARRL Repeater Directory, a few coordinators opted in, but most opted out and I think everybody in the U.S. is out by now. RFinder has tried to make deals with some of the coordinators, but their terms were not all that great. Since then, RFinder has forged ahead with their crowd sourced data and, sadly, the ARRL spits that questionable data back out in the form of the ARRL Repeater Directory.
Crowd sourcing repeater data has good points and bad points. The good is that the database will, hopefully, reflect what repeaters are actually on the air and how they are being used. The bad is that it takes a dedicated individual with knowledge of the local repeater landscape to know when the crowd is feeding bad data to the database. Whenever the subject of crowd sourced online databases comes up, I make some spot checks of the popular websites and I usually find all kinds of errors (including one county where half the listings are incorrect). All because nobody is vetting the data.
As I mentioned early in this thread, the coordinators often have an "online listing which reflects current
coordinations". The key to that statement is "coordinations" as the coordinator knows what frequencies have been set aside for which repeaters, but may not know if the repeater is functioning. The coordinators I know strive to keep their databases "clean", but they are still at the mercy of the trustees and the data they supply.