• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Conventional Scan Speed

Not open for further replies.


Sep 1, 2006
Minneapolis, MN
I’ve been experimenting more with conventional channels on my G5. With a full 16 conventional channels, the scan speed seems very slow. Significant portions of transmissions start late compared to other devices. Perhaps this is because it assumes a singular paging frequency would be monitored at once? Anyone else notice this?


Dec 24, 2005
Uxbridge, north of the river Thames
It definitely scans through channels slow compared To a regular scanner, it’s also slow when it’s trying to scan through frequencies for a control channel. I believe they may have addressed this in the new firmware as it will need to scan faster when switching from system to system


Silent key.
Premium Subscriber
Dec 18, 2002
Virginia Beach,VA
Make a zone and knob position for each frequency, then make another knob position for scan


  • conv scan 1.png
    conv scan 1.png
    71.9 KB · Views: 24
  • conv scan2.png
    conv scan2.png
    301.2 KB · Views: 26
  • conv scan3.png
    conv scan3.png
    323.2 KB · Views: 20
Not open for further replies.