CSP on RR database

[Mork]

With the newer programming software out that relies on accurate information in RR database, can those of us in CT actively work on bringing the CSP data up to date. for example, the following TG are still not listed:

0 000 D 126 S ATY State's Attorney
0 000 E 125 ADM S Administration Secure
0 000 E 121 ESU S Emergency Services Unit Secure
0 000 E 118 SNTF S Statewide Narcotics Task Force Secure
0 000 E 115 BCI S Bureau of Criminal Investigations Secure
0 000 D 114 BCI 2 Bureau of Criminal Investigations 2
0 000 D 93 CAS 1 Casino Unit 1
0 000 D 94 CAS 2 Casino Unit 2
0 000 D 113 BCI 1 Bureau of Criminal Investigations 1
0 000 D 124 ADM Administration

I'd also like to suggest changes to the Named Sites. Since this is a SmartNet system, naming a site by it's primary function gets confusiing when you see an Alpha Label that says, for example, "Troop A & I Simulcast" then below it "Troop H" dispatch group comes up is rather strange. Perhaps the tower location or just CT State Police would be more appropriate.

What do you folks think?

doc

 

[cg]

The descriptions come from what is broadcast over the data channel. (except for 43, somebody made that up)
The one in your example I believe shows "2 A-I". In my mind, what is posted makes sense, the Prime Site number and the primary user.
Most of those descriptions came from a document I generated and posted in the files of SCANCONNECTICUT group. (I took the info from monitoring with Unitrunker).

Perhaps some of the talkgroups IDs that are missing are being withheld due to their use.

chris

 

[Mork]

Witheld?

Chris I know you been against listing these TG since we've been monitoring CSP however, if not encrypted, any of these groups can be received in ID Search mode. I see no reason not to see them listed.

 

[800crazy1]

agreed here ! its like not listing the input freqs for conventional scanning , enter that and hit the desimal point and you get it any ways..can someone reason with this , maybe theres a good point for not doing this...