CSX Timetable for Narrowbanding

Status
Not open for further replies.

DODGEIT

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
109
Reaction score
1
Location
Kodak Tennessee
This is from TRAINS Magazine.

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — CSX has announced its timetable for transitioning from
wideband (25 KHz) to narrowband (12.5 KHz) railroad radio operation, the
American Short Line & Regional Railroad Association reported. It is the first
Class I railroad to furnish this information for dissemination. The Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) has mandated the end of wideband two-way radio
transmission for non-military purposes in the U.S. after Jan. 1, 2013. [See
Technology, October 2010 TRAINS] The CSX timetable presently calls for the
changeover to be completed entirely in 2011.


CSX will transition by operating division, as follows:

April 2011: Atlanta, Florence, Jacksonville, and Nashville Divisions

June 2011: Great Lakes, Huntington, and Louisville Divisions

September 2011: Albany, Baltimore, and Chicago Divisions

The action will have a cascading effect on other railroads. For example, a
short line or regional railroad connecting with CSX will need to match the changeover
schedule if it interchanges cars or uses CSX trackage rights. While connecting
railroads may want to transition their entire railroad at that time, they may
have to temporarily maintain two radio systems if they connect with another
Class I that has not yet changed from wide to narrowband.
 

Railham_CJ

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
109
Reaction score
3
Location
Florida
I'll be deffinatley be ready by then with that Icom F5061 sense the April date what i am affected by . CSX is being 2 years AHEAD of the Deadline . Nice Job CSX .
 

venom6733

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
279
Reaction score
32
this may sound like a stupid question...but will that effect the way i listen to csx channels on a bcd996T?...thanks
 

kamikaze1

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Location
greenwood sc
This is from TRAINS Magazine.

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — CSX has announced its timetable for transitioning from
wideband (25 KHz) to narrowband (12.5 KHz) railroad radio operation, the
American Short Line & Regional Railroad Association reported. It is the first
Class I railroad to furnish this information for dissemination. The Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) has mandated the end of wideband two-way radio
transmission for non-military purposes in the U.S. after Jan. 1, 2013. [See
Technology, October 2010 TRAINS] The CSX timetable presently calls for the
changeover to be completed entirely in 2011.


CSX will transition by operating division, as follows:

April 2011: Atlanta, Florence, Jacksonville, and Nashville Divisions

June 2011: Great Lakes, Huntington, and Louisville Divisions

September 2011: Albany, Baltimore, and Chicago Divisions

The action will have a cascading effect on other railroads. For example, a
short line or regional railroad connecting with CSX will need to match the changeover
schedule if it interchanges cars or uses CSX trackage rights. While connecting
railroads may want to transition their entire railroad at that time, they may
have to temporarily maintain two radio systems if they connect with another
Class I that has not yet changed from wide to narrowband.




yes maxwell yard in greenwood has already started using the new channels but still using the old ones 2
 

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,242
Reaction score
391
Location
Fortunately, GA
this may sound like a stupid question...but will that effect the way i listen to csx channels on a bcd996T?...thanks

I program my 396 via FreeScan. In the drop down menu, I've just changed the receive to NFM. The receive seems to have degraded just a bit. Will see if that fixes it.
Larry
 

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,242
Reaction score
391
Location
Fortunately, GA
Are they switching the actual transmit mode, and/or, the narrowband frequencies also? Because I have a VX354 that will work fine for both:)
Larry
 

WA1ATA

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
416
Reaction score
4
Location
Fairhaven MA / San Jose CA / Kihei HI
I don't understand the interoperabilty issue.
While connecting
railroads may want to transition their entire railroad at that time, they may
have to temporarily maintain two radio systems if they connect with another
Class I that has not yet changed from wide to narrowband.

Why doesn't everybody just keep the same frequencies during an interim transition period?

Same frequency but narrower modulation works with the older radios, with most people not even noticing the slight reduction in audio level.

Why change frequency lineup and complicate matters?
 

burner50

The Third Variable
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
2,305
Reaction score
171
Location
NC Iowa
Several territories on UP have transitioned as well.


Same frequencies, but narrow bandwidth
 

KC9LQV

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
150
Reaction score
22
Location
SW Indiana
On the CE&D Sub (Nashville Division), there have been no changes I've noticed, and April is almost over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top