BinaryMode
Blondie Once Said To Call Her But Never Answerd
My post is not addressed directly to redbeard but to everyone…and I have very little knowledge in this area so pardon my stupidity and this is not to find fault with anyone’s interpretation, but I have gone back and read most past posts on decryption and frankly I have not seen a definitive explanation as to the true legality in the real world. Many theories and quotes of FCC docs etc., but none that actually address this.
Fortunately at this point I have no need in my area for decrypting, so this is strictly an interest, but I would love to see a legal, clear statement on this, not just interpreting what someone thinks it means. I assume there have been no test cases in court etc. Not sure what “legal access” means and how one judges.
As a final example, when voice inversion was being used, I do not believe anyone was convicted of a crime for “decrypting” this. I know I did it then. I am sure someone will say today is different but again just curious as to why.
Please criticize, flame me a bit and prove I am wrong as I really would like to learn something! Thanks.
It basically comes down to the illegal wiretapping already on the books...
So the moral of the story is, if you don't own the key or have permission to use it, you are illegal wiretapping... Inversion is "scrambling."
Also, that scanner would serve as exhibit A in court if used in an illegal manner.
Last edited: