Forgive me if this has been asked, but...
I was attempting to monitor radio traffic about an auto accident in Dalton today when the feed was locked up by a ham radio user rag chewing for 5 or 10 minutes, thus making it impossible to hear anything about the accident. Has this concern been addressed before? As a ham myself, I appreciate the interest the volunteer scanner feeders have for ham repeaters, but I feel like the primary benefit of live audio feeds is to hear public service traffic from police, fire and EMS.
Ham traffic obviously can add some info during severe weather incidents, but years of monitoring experience has taught me that public service traffic is less casual, more concise, informative and less likely to monopolize the feed. Any thoughts?
I was attempting to monitor radio traffic about an auto accident in Dalton today when the feed was locked up by a ham radio user rag chewing for 5 or 10 minutes, thus making it impossible to hear anything about the accident. Has this concern been addressed before? As a ham myself, I appreciate the interest the volunteer scanner feeders have for ham repeaters, but I feel like the primary benefit of live audio feeds is to hear public service traffic from police, fire and EMS.
Ham traffic obviously can add some info during severe weather incidents, but years of monitoring experience has taught me that public service traffic is less casual, more concise, informative and less likely to monopolize the feed. Any thoughts?