• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Duplexer Problem? Motorola GMRS Repeater

Status
Not open for further replies.

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,674
Location
Hubert, NC
As Kayn pointed out, the quality control on the tuning rods leaves a lot to be desired. While tuning, the waveform on the monitor will jump quite a bit. Mine was so bad that it was just unusable for my application. Mine was just to add isolation between two repeaters (GMRS/ham - each with their own BPBR duplexers), but the insertion loss was just too great.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,832
Location
Sector 001
As Kayn pointed out, the quality control on the tuning rods leaves a lot to be desired. While tuning, the waveform on the monitor will jump quite a bit. Mine was so bad that it was just unusable for my application. Mine was just to add isolation between two repeaters (GMRS/ham - each with their own BPBR duplexers), but the insertion loss was just too great.


Yea, the screw, with locking nut is a PITA to tune... Well not tune, but to maintain once tuned as you tighten down the locking nut... Oh the nightmares....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,832
Location
Sector 001
When I ordered the duplexer, I gave them specific TX and RX that I am using. They even wrote the frequency on the high and low ports. I never touched any of the tuning screws. I can tell the screws were adjusted because of the paint marks but there is a nut to keep them locked into place. I was very leery of going the Asian route "no offense intended" but was reassured by some reviews that the most notable problem with them was that they may cause slight interference with a close frequency.

A friend and I compared an ebay China special duplexer to an actual Sinclair mobile duplexer, and surprisingly they were just as good, at least the one we compared was.

I don't have any equipment to test the duplexer but at this point, I think I am going to start by replacing it first. I also contacted the seller of the duplexer to let them know the amount of wattage loss. If its only supposed to be 1 db, I still think it has a problem or was falsely advertised.


I doubt it is false advertising, but likely it was jarred during shipping, or something like that. The guy that tuned it may have just not cares enough to get it perfect too.

I was considering this Motorola MSF5000 100 watt UHF duplexer.

I found someone to tune it as well for a fee.


Please LISTEN to what we are suggesting to you.. First things first, dump the LMR cable. Then find someone that can verify the tuning of the duplexer. Do not start throwing good money after bad by buying inferior equipment and expecting it to fix your problems. Inferior equipment will give you inferior results.

Do not waste your money on the MSF duplexer, go and find a Celwave or Sinclair that is a proper BpBr duplexer.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

petnrdx

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
404
Location
Hudson, FL
That is not a duplexer.
It is a pre-filter and post filter for an MSF5000 transmitter.
Won't work for you.
That "pre-post filter" arrangement works in the MSF with a particular length coax Tee arrangement, AND the extremely large, very selective receiver front end of the MSF.
So, what you are looking at is really only "half" of the duplexing setup of the MSF5000.
It is a kind of unusual setup.
The small filter on the left end is a filter that goes between the exciter and the PA
The larger section on the right is to filter after the PA, then goes the "critical" length coax TEE section that spilts the antenna feed to the RX.
Look for a real duplexer.
 

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83
Ok, I dumped the idea of the Motorola cavity
I'm going to start with coax
I have read some suggestion on heliax. I'm on a budget of course so any suggestions on how low I can go on the coax?
Thanks again
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,674
Location
Hubert, NC
Commscope LDF4-50A (1/2" Heliax) is available for $1.99 a foot from www.theantennafarm.com

You can usually pick up the same on Ebay for about $1 a foot, but the auctions end fast. I would not go under 3/8" Heliax. There is a nice loss calculator here: Coax Loss Calculator where you can see the pros/cons of each feedline.
 

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83
Any input on this Andrew Heliax cables, 3/8 inch X 50 feet. 50 ohm, low loss foam dielectric
FSJ2-50
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,674
Location
Hubert, NC
It is okay, but connectors are much easier to find for the 1/2" stuff. Plus, it's higher loss. It isn't even listed on that coax calculator that I sent.
 

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83
It is okay, but connectors are much easier to find for the 1/2" stuff. Plus, it's higher loss. It isn't even listed on that coax calculator that I sent.

It already has the N connectors on it. I don't want to waste the time and money on it though if its going to put me in the same boat but if its justifiably better than the 400 coax I am wanting to pull the trigger on it
 

Attachments

  • Heliax.jpg
    Heliax.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 759

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,674
Location
Hubert, NC
I would still try to stick with 1/2", but yes, the 3/8" is still better than LMR400 for repeater service.
 

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83
I found a small communications shop called Meyer Electronics here in Cincinnati while trying to find some Heliax. He pretty much told me it was going to be expensive but when I told him I needed 50 feet, he was questioning what I needed it for so I told him about the repeater. He was telling me he sets up repeaters here locally "I only taking this with a grain of salt" but he said the LMR 400 should be fine in this situation with only 50 feet but he rather seemed interested in testing everything out. I did not know that he offered this service. So from this point he said bring the whole repeater in and he will start with a 1 hour bench check to test the duplexer and "desensitization". It 70$ per hour but I think from all the info you guys have gave me so far, this is the best route to go.
Does that seem unreasonable?
 

jsikora

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
48
Location
West Monroe NY
In reality what you are seeing is about correct for the antenna and cable you have. I have multiple GR1225 repeaters all set for 25 watts TX (45 watt PA turned down) and routinely see between 15-18 watts out of the duplexer at the rear of the chassis. Couple that with LMR400 (junk for duplex) and its not going to work too well. I run a DB404 on all my GR1225 Repeaters with 30-50 feet of 1/2" Andrews Hard Line. I also have checked all the cheap duplexers on my service monitor and you will see 1.5 to 3 db of loss thru them. Changing out the jumpers between the radio to the duplexer will help very minimal. It will help but not resolve your issue. Get a real antenna and real hardline.

BTW - I run the same mobile duplexer (1 is NOS from Motorola and 2 are China Ebays Units) and on 2 repeaters have all 5 pairs in it however have it tuned to the center frequency.
 

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83
In reality what you are seeing is about correct for the antenna and cable you have. I have multiple GR1225 repeaters all set for 25 watts TX (45 watt PA turned down) and routinely see between 15-18 watts out of the duplexer at the rear of the chassis. Couple that with LMR400 (junk for duplex) and its not going to work too well. I run a DB404 on all my GR1225 Repeaters with 30-50 feet of 1/2" Andrews Hard Line. I also have checked all the cheap duplexers on my service monitor and you will see 1.5 to 3 db of loss thru them. Changing out the jumpers between the radio to the duplexer will help very minimal. It will help but not resolve your issue. Get a real antenna and real hardline.

BTW - I run the same mobile duplexer (1 is NOS from Motorola and 2 are China Ebays Units) and on 2 repeaters have all 5 pairs in it however have it tuned to the center frequency.

I think right now I am going to go with the Andrew 3/8 FSJ2-50
I figured my Antenna was OK, What are you recommending?
 

linboogy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
83
Just wanted to update
Installed the Andrew 3/8's Heliax and replaced the Antenna with a Comet CA-712EFC 9DB gain antenna
The SWR is 1.1
The power for some reason went from 15 watts to 20 watts on my meter. The N connectors were pre installed on the Heliax
I am still having the same exact issue. Very spotty coverage and not hardly able to hit an HT 3 miles away
Other than taking the repeater to get it serviced, I am out of things to try.
Any other ideas? could it just be desensitized from this point?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top