EBRCS Update

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,185
Reaction score
32,584
Location
United States
the only way to be fully compliant is to not broadcast the information over an LMR radio at all.

Any public safety agency must abide by the rules for handling CJI/PII if they are connected to CLETS. That includes everyone/anyone that has access to the information, loads encryption keys, has access to the physical dispatch equipment, spaces, terminals, servers, etc. If an agency is not doing that, they can get their accreditation pulled. We go through this once a year. I have to do the training or I get locked out. The agency I work with is very careful about this, as are most.

No one should have access to a radio that is loaded with encryption keys if they haven't been background checked and have completed the CADOJ/FBI training. If a radio is lost/stolen, it should be reported and encryption keys changed immediately.

Officers should be taking steps to make sure radio volume is at a level that the general public can't hear, and why many use earpieces.

And the FBI/DOJ rules do allow transmitting PII/CJI over the radio if it is properly encrypted. That would be fully compliant.
 

Outerdog

T¹ ÆS Ø
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Messages
688
Reaction score
846
Wonder if we can keep the EBRCS Update thread a thread about EBRCS updates and not another goddamn encryption debate or sermon?
 

officer_415

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
1,577
Reaction score
810
Location
SF Bay Area
I'm working a significant DB update, and I have a question about LAVTA. The database currently lists LAVTA as a "transit trunking" system, where the talkgroups have no specific use but are assigned as needed when a bus driver initiates a voice call:

DEC HEX Mode Alpha TagDescriptionTag
5002138aTLAVTA1Transit Trunking Ch 1 (Bus to Dispatch)Transportation
5003138bDLAVTA2Transit Trunking Ch 2 (Bus to Dispatch)Transportation
5004138cDLAVTA3Transit Trunking Ch 3 (Dispatch to Bus)Transportation
5005138dDLAVTA4Transit Trunking Ch 4 (Dispatch to Bus)Transportation
5006138eDLAVTA5Transit Trunking Ch 5 (Misc Use)Transportation

The submission I'm working shows the talkgroups with the following assignments instead:

5001 - Announcement
5002 - Fixed Route
5003 - Dial-A-Ride
5004 - DART
5005 - Maintenance
5006 - Admin

Can anyone confirm which one is correct?
 

kaws

Newbie
Joined
Aug 9, 2025
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When encryption rolls out, no one will be able to publicly monitor any police channels EBRCS dispatches for?
 

Kmcevoy

Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Location
Rio Vista, Ca Solano County
The entire EBRCS system including 43 Law Enforcment Agencies from Contra Costa County and others on the EBRCS system is going encrypted on September 4, 2025. In Contra Costa all cities and county law enforcement will be encrypted so you will not be able to hear any law enforcement communications. The Contra Costa Fire will remain without encryption.
 

Kmcevoy

Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Location
Rio Vista, Ca Solano County
The entire EBRCS system including 43 Law Enforcment Agencies from Contra Costa County and others on the EBRCS system is going encrypted on September 4, 2025. In Contra Costa all cities and county law enforcement will be encrypted so you will not be able to hear any law enforcement communications. The Contra Costa Fire will remain without encryption.
1756743875729.jpeg
 

phirephoto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
356
Reaction score
6
Location
Fremont, CA
Is it JUST Law that's going encrypted or is everything in EBRCS going encrypted - Fire, EMS, etc?
 
Top