Not sure. I wish people would post in the forums the changes they intend to submit to provide a documentation trail. I also think the RRDB should be more descriptive in their change notes, marking exactly what was changed.What exactly were the changes made with these, and can explanations be documented in the future?
View attachment 89398
Typically when it says stuff like that, it's behind-the-scenes changes, such as changing the order the frequencies shown on a site or changing the lat/long of the site or any of the other meta-data of a specific site. It doesn't go into much detail when changing site details except when changing the site's name (not the case here).I believe It shows you what changes were made, Changed site names from #003 to 003, #002 to 002 and #001 to 001, the # was removed.
No, that's not what was changed.I believe It shows you what changes were made, Changed site names from #003 to 003, #002 to 002 and #001 to 001, the # was removed.
Likely. The point is the edit needs to be more specific, because a change in site NAC for instance, could easily be missed and render a radio using site NACs deaf. A range change could also be problematic because Uniden radios that are using location based scanning could be affected, particularly if Favorites list are being used (a database change does not get written to Favorites lists.) A user would need to update a Favorites list manually, and if they don't know what change, it is a PITA.Typically when it says stuff like that, it's behind-the-scenes changes, such as changing the order the frequencies shown on a site or changing the lat/long of the site or any of the other meta-data of a specific site. It doesn't go into much detail when changing site details except when changing the site's name (not the case here).
So are you saying that a change to a range setting or site NAC would be noted? It doesn't get highlighted in green. Changes are something that needs to be better documented / more descriptive, even if it is impossible to do so today.MCJONES2013 is correct. It is usually housekeeping / behind-the-scenes changes. Nothing that usually affects the user experience. The change log notes are system generated. It is not something that we enter or can elaborate on.
Some further info here:
1 & 2 had Neighbor lists changed/added, 3 had the NAC Added AFAIKWhat exactly were the changes made with these, and can explanations be documented in the future?
View attachment 89398
Yes, I believe these are the changes that I made.1 & 2 had Neighbor lists changed/added, 3 had the NAC Added AFAIK
LOL, a number of Calvert licenses are in danger of being terminated because of failure to update their construction status. The do expect to be online with their new P25 system in the Fall.More changes to MD trunked systems:
AstraZeneca - MedImmune - location updated to remove redundancy
Calvert P25 - callsign corrected
Howard - callsigns added
University of Maryland, Baltimore - system name changed to conform to MD university naming system
Worcester - location changed to "Various"
Dave