KG4WHM said:That is what I heard never did look it up.
RevGary said:Follow-up: According to my relative who lives near Pembine, the P25 equipment costs the county 3 times what analog equipment costs, breaks down 3 times as much and costs 3 times as much to repair. While I have no way to confirm these figures myself, I have been told by a Kenwood servicer in the past, that not only does the equipment cost much more to own and to service, but the servicing dealers have had to purchase P-25 service monitors at a rough cost averaging $16,000.00 to $21,000.00 EACH. They have to PAY for that equipment by raising their service rates and that also translates into higher expenses for EVERYONE - in getting equipment serviced, both P25 and analog.
Anyone who has used P25 equipment in certain types of terrain knows, from first hand experience, that signal dropouts, due to digital packet loss, is significantly more frequent than signal issues in analog mode. Just because a "new" technology is offered, does not necessarilly mean that it is better than what it is trying to replace. Some public safety radio system administrators are finding this out for themselves as more and more P25 equipment and signal processing issues crop up.
I can monitor Marinette county from my Rectory office 80 miles away from the primary central county tower. I hear mobiles in P25 mode getting no response from dispatch. They then go into analog mode and dispatch does answwer. Do we have a potential safety related situation here with the 'marvelous' new technology? Just something to think about.
Someone changed the direction of this thread from Forest County issues to Marinette County issues. But the same issues in both areas seem to indicate that both are experiencing difficulties with P25. We certainly hope that personnel safety is not being compromised.
triryche said:Re: 155.640... I have not heard that used by any law enforcement since 2004. That used to contain DES encrypted traffic as well.
newald said:Sheriff and Police Departments in Langlade County (107.2 PL), Lincoln County (103.5 PL), Oneida County (114.8 PL) and Vilas County (118.8 PL) still use 155.6400.
RevGary said:Follow-up: According to my relative who lives near Pembine, the P25 equipment costs the county 3 times what analog equipment costs, breaks down 3 times as much and costs 3 times as much to repair. While I have no way to confirm these figures myself, I have been told by a Kenwood servicer in the past, that not only does the equipment cost much more to own and to service, but the servicing dealers have had to purchase P-25 service monitors at a rough cost averaging $16,000.00 to $21,000.00 EACH. They have to PAY for that equipment by raising their service rates and that also translates into higher expenses for EVERYONE - in getting equipment serviced, both P25 and analog.
Anyone who has used P25 equipment in certain types of terrain knows, from first hand experience, that signal dropouts, due to digital packet loss, is significantly more frequent than signal issues in analog mode. Just because a "new" technology is offered, does not necessarilly mean that it is better than what it is trying to replace. Some public safety radio system administrators are finding this out for themselves as more and more P25 equipment and signal processing issues crop up.
I can monitor Marinette county from my Rectory office 80 miles away from the primary central county tower. I hear mobiles in P25 mode getting no response from dispatch. They then go into analog mode and dispatch does answwer. Do we have a potential safety related situation here with the 'marvelous' new technology? Just something to think about.
Someone changed the direction of this thread from Forest County issues to Marinette County issues. But the same issues in both areas seem to indicate that both are experiencing difficulties with P25. We certainly hope that personnel safety is not being compromised.
I was told from a radio tech when I was in the Air Force that they got the same if not BETTER signals with p25 than with analog. Usually when P25 goes out there would be too much static in an analog transmission to understand it.RevGary said:Please use logic to figure out for yourself what the issues are. The analog traffic on 155.535 is in the majority once again because of the issues with their new radio equipment. (The majority of this info came from a relative in that county who is a county employee.)
KG4WHM said:I was told from a radio tech when I was in the Air Force that they got the same if not BETTER signals with p25 than with analog. Usually when P25 goes out there would be too much static in an analog transmission to understand it.
triryche said:Depends on the band I am told. VHF P25 can have better signal coverage however if one is in a "blind spot" there is no weak signal to try and pull out of static. With digital you have or you don't have signal. Double edged sword so to speak...... and P25 doesn't seem to enhance it any way and may actually be worse. I would like to see some low band P25 put into action!:lol: :lol:
I think that is the main reason some of these counties have coverage trouble.KG4WHM said:I believe encryption, AES or DES-OFB, will limit the P25 signal.
soory about the username spell check changed it.deplete said:I think that is the main reason some of these counties have coverage trouble.
Iron county was using digital way more than they are recently. I can't say why they are more analog now, but you can add them to the list of counties that were running primarily digital and now are more analog again.