• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Ground radial for mirror-mount CB antenna on semi truck?

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,506
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
So if I didn’t go with a magnet mount antenna on the roof, would something like this actually be better and worth buying over what I have now?

Your current setup would work better and a 1.6:1 match is fine for what it is. If you want to improve it get a short 3/8-24 mount CB whip, drill a hole in your mirror mount and put the new whip on upside down and grounded to the mount using a 3/8-24 nut and lock washer. You will have to retune and I would start with the new whip maybe adding an alligator clip or placing your hand near it to see what happens to determine if it needs to be lengthened or shortened then trim if needed. Then do the same to the original whip until the match is as low as you can get it.
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,131
Location
DN32su
The mirrors on my Freighliner were stainless, so effectively, the truck was a good counterpoise.
Ham antenna on the left mirror, CB on the right, and tuned up very nicely.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,296
Location
United States
I'd agree, 1.6:1 ain't bad.
And the dipole setup seems to be a good setup for some trucks.

If you are concerned about performance, there's stuff you can do, like getting rid of the extra coaxial cable you must have coiled up somewhere in the cab?
 

corneileous

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
126
Location
Oklahoma
Your current setup would work better and a 1.6:1 match is fine for what it is. If you want to improve it get a short 3/8-24 mount CB whip, drill a hole in your mirror mount and put the new whip on upside down and grounded to the mount using a 3/8-24 nut and lock washer. You will have to retune and I would start with the new whip maybe adding an alligator clip or placing your hand near it to see what happens to determine if it needs to be lengthened or shortened then trim if needed. Then do the same to the original whip until the match is as low as you can get it.
I have no idea what you’re talking about here…lol.
 

corneileous

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
126
Location
Oklahoma
I'd agree, 1.6:1 ain't bad.
And the dipole setup seems to be a good setup for some trucks.

If you are concerned about performance, there's stuff you can do, like getting rid of the extra coaxial cable you must have coiled up somewhere in the cab?
It’s not necessarily coiled up it’s looped very loosely so that it doesn’t create a choke but OK, I’m glad you bring this up because I was always told that you wanted to use an 18 foot coax whether you need that much or not and I’ve even seen on the back of antenna packages that recommend using an 18 foot coax also.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,296
Location
United States
It’s not necessarily coiled up it’s looped very loosely so that it doesn’t create a choke but OK, I’m glad you bring this up because I was always told that you wanted to use an 18 foot coax whether you need that much or not and I’ve even seen on the back of antenna packages that recommend using an 18 foot coax also.

The correct length of coax to have between your radio and your antenna is whatever length you need to get there.
What 18 feet does on CB frequencies is hide high SWR from the radio. It doesn't fix anything.
What it does do is make a poorly tuned antenna look good to an SWR meter. Hiding high SWR from the radio might look good on the meter, but it doesn't mean your antenna is working well. Your 1.6:1 SWR may or may not be accurate if you are measuring it at the radio with 18 feet of coax between it and the antenna.

The excess coax adds some amount of loss. Probably not much at 27MHz, but it's not zero. If you don't need it, remove it.
 
Top