Honest answer please.

Status
Not open for further replies.

dan2125

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Location
CHAMPLIN
Would the Uniden SDS scanners give me any improvement in what I am currently hearing? Been using Pro -197 and Pro -106 for 15 years. I'm in the 55316 zip code of Hennepin county. Thanks.
 

jason_58201

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
162
Reaction score
25
Location
Polk County, MN
Would the Uniden SDS scanners give me any improvement in what I am currently hearing? Been using Pro -197 and Pro -106 for 15 years. I'm in the 55316 zip code of Hennepin county. Thanks.
I don’t think they sds is worth the money period. I am not sure I’d buy another scanner. Encryption is the future it would seem.

The question is, why do you think you need to upgrade?
 

jason_58201

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
162
Reaction score
25
Location
Polk County, MN
I don’t think they sds is worth the money period. I am not sure I’d buy another scanner. Encryption is the future it would seem.

The question is, why do you think you need to upgrade?
with exception to simulcast decoding the Bcd x36 is as good as the sds at almost half the price.
 

dan2125

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Location
CHAMPLIN
I don’t think they sds is worth the money period. I am not sure I’d buy another scanner. Encryption is the future it would seem.

The question is, why do you think you need to upgrade?
Hoping for better reception, possibly hear more transmissions because of simulcast problems in my area.
 

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
3,811
Reaction score
1,926
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
A better antenna may work for you. Would try that first before buying another scanner. Also, a FM filter may help too with all the radio stations around.
 

dan2125

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Location
CHAMPLIN
A better antenna may work for you. Would try that first before buying another scanner. Also, a FM filter may help too with all the radio stations around.

with exception to simulcast decoding the Bcd x36 is as good as the sds at almost half the price.
I am also using a Uniden BCD 396 XT with the radio shack 800 mhz antenna. What radio would you be referring to?
 

wogggieee

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
131
Location
Hugo , MN
I'm 100% SDR at this point, that would be the route I'd go. Cheaper and more flexible.
 

mmtstc

Ø
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
881
Reaction score
52
Location
Minneapolis Area
I'm 100% SDR at this point, that would be the route I'd go. Cheaper and more flexible.
and the technical skill required is not too high, especially with the tutorials freely available.
I use two SDRs and usually have three VFOs logging data and one VFO running audio which is enough chaos for me to try and keep track of.

My fixed setup is a 2017 iMac bootcamped to run Win10, two nooelec nesdr SDRs, an antenna splitter pigtail, and a nooelec RaTLsnake antenna. Computer was free, windows license was $30, SDRs were $30 each, antenna splitter was $10, USB hub was $12, and the antenna was $40. I run Unitrunker V2, which is free.
My mobile setup is a $90 HP Elitebook with 8GB RAM and a 500gb SSD that i bought used on ebay that i use the same peripherals on. I just transfer my most current unitrunker.xml file between them when i am on the road.

I'm $240 into this and I have a pretty deluxe setup IMO.
Since i started my Unitrunker.xml file in 2008 (it's kind of like a sourdough mother culture), I have 62,572 unique radios logged on ARMER.
 

KD0NDO

Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
429
Reaction score
38
The unication pagers are absolutely the best option for decode quality next to the real thing. If you can deal with a few of its limitations its worth every penny. I bought the G4 and its not even comparable to any scanner I've ever used on ARMER.
 

wogggieee

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
131
Location
Hugo , MN
and the technical skill required is not too high, especially with the tutorials freely available.
I use two SDRs and usually have three VFOs logging data and one VFO running audio which is enough chaos for me to try and keep track of.

My fixed setup is a 2017 iMac bootcamped to run Win10, two nooelec nesdr SDRs, an antenna splitter pigtail, and a nooelec RaTLsnake antenna. Computer was free, windows license was $30, SDRs were $30 each, antenna splitter was $10, USB hub was $12, and the antenna was $40. I run Unitrunker V2, which is free.
My mobile setup is a $90 HP Elitebook with 8GB RAM and a 500gb SSD that i bought used on ebay that i use the same peripherals on. I just transfer my most current unitrunker.xml file between them when i am on the road.

I'm $240 into this and I have a pretty deluxe setup IMO.
Since i started my Unitrunker.xml file in 2008 (it's kind of like a sourdough mother culture), I have 62,572 unique radios logged on ARMER
I'm using two Airspys and a small linux box I built. It uses trunk recorder to record everything (that I want) on the Ramsey and Washington county sites. Then Rdio Scanner is my front end interface I use to listen live or to any recordings. This allows me to never miss anything and to listen and control what I want to hear anywhere with an internet connection. I've got about $400 into it.
 

ofd8001

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
8,419
Reaction score
1,547
Location
Louisville, KY
I've tried to listen to the ARMER system in Hennepin County on various models of Uniden scanners starting with the 796D. The only satisfactory ones were the SDS 100 and 200.

Antennas don't help, actually worsen the problem.

SDR is the best answer for those technical capable or who wish to dive in.

Unications are good for simulcast digital systems, but are challenging to program and are kind of limited on the number of things that can be scanned at the same time.
 

tadsmith

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
49
Reaction score
31
The unication pagers are absolutely the best option for decode quality next to the real thing. If you can deal with a few of its limitations its worth every penny. I bought the G4 and its not even comparable to any scanner I've ever used on ARMER.
I really do love the sound of the Unication. I've got a number of different SDR setups in place, but the Unication sound is far superior. There are some feature trade-offs versus a scanner, but you're getting a device that has passed most of the P25 Compliance Assessment Program requirements from the Department of Homeland Security for a receiving radio. The reception is also far superior to any of the SDR programs I've tried.

That being said, encryption is coming, and coming quickly, so you need to trade that off against the cost you're investing in a $6-700 radio.
 

wogggieee

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
131
Location
Hugo , MN
I have had moderate success with a Uniden 996 if I used a yagi pointed at a single tower which aren't in the direction of another tower. It seemed to reduce simulcasting issues enough to get acceptable reception. It was an annoying method though which required some experimentation and would have to be reset if it got bumped.
 

dave3825

* * * * * * * * * * * *
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 17, 2003
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
6,118
Location
Suffolk County NY
Disagree on this :(
Antennas don't help, actually worsen the problem.

Certain spots my 436 sounds like crap on simulcast using a remtronics antenna tuned for 800mhz. Throw a general wideband antennas or a stubby zero gain and it sounds pretty good.


Totally agree on this :)
SDR is the best answer for those technical capable or who wish to dive in.

Running many dongles on simulcast systems and they sound great.
 

ofd8001

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
8,419
Reaction score
1,547
Location
Louisville, KY
The best reception I got on a simulcast system is when I had a broken coax on the antenna. (All non-simulcast went to heck though).

With simulcast, receiving too many sites causes the audio decode issue. So a poorer antenna may only draw in one or two. There was a thread on how some use a paper clip antenna for best simulcast decode.
 

steve9570

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
276
Reaction score
170
Location
USA
I really do love the sound of the Unication. I've got a number of different SDR setups in place, but the Unication sound is far superior. There are some feature trade-offs versus a scanner, but you're getting a device that has passed most of the P25 Compliance Assessment Program requirements from the Department of Homeland Security for a receiving radio. The reception is also far superior to any of the SDR programs I've tried.

That being said, encryption is coming, and coming quickly, so you need to trade that off against the cost you're investing in a $6-700 radio.
I agree The Unications I have sound so much better than any of my scanners even the Minitors I have work and sound great. and the small size of both make it easy to carry around in public.

Steve
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top