rapidcharger
Member
Forgive me if this has been asked or if I missed something but how has Vermont completely avoided digital and trunking and even 7/800mhz on public safety?
It's like none to the usual scare tactics (terrorists, school shooters, etc) and other reasons (interop, mandates, end of life) for going to digital and/or insanely expensive trunking systems has worked there. Even though it has worked in neighboring states.
There are similarly sized cities to Burlington and Montpelier in other places that have spent many millions of dollars they never had to begin with to go digital, and go trunked and go to 800 and go encrypted. Heck, there's cities that are a lot smaller that aren't even cities at all, they're just vast agricultural areas or even swampland with hardly any inhabitants that have put up multi-million dollar digital trunking systems!
What can we learn from Vermont?
It's like none to the usual scare tactics (terrorists, school shooters, etc) and other reasons (interop, mandates, end of life) for going to digital and/or insanely expensive trunking systems has worked there. Even though it has worked in neighboring states.
There are similarly sized cities to Burlington and Montpelier in other places that have spent many millions of dollars they never had to begin with to go digital, and go trunked and go to 800 and go encrypted. Heck, there's cities that are a lot smaller that aren't even cities at all, they're just vast agricultural areas or even swampland with hardly any inhabitants that have put up multi-million dollar digital trunking systems!
What can we learn from Vermont?