IC-R15 - First Impressions

xms3200

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
321
Reaction score
243
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
racin06...With such a big collection of very expensive name brand radios, that is really great to hear that you are impressed with the IC-R15 on airband. After some testing, let us know how the Alinco compares to the IC-R15
 

airwolfbell222

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
244
Reaction score
214
Location
Central North Carolina
You sure went full throttle buying radios. The R15 will smoke that alinco. Won't decode the new VDL being deployed. Watched that for awhile but decided not to purchase it. The DSP2 is a great HF receiver. A little bit of a learning curve but overall a great radio.
I do not understand why Alinco wouldn't come up with a way to decode VDL. This why I won't buy that radio.
 

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
3,620
Reaction score
1,773
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
I do not understand why Alinco wouldn't come up with a way to decode VDL. This why I won't buy that radio.
I emailed Alinco USA about this. Said he had to ask corporate for an answer. Never heard back. That was 2 months ago. Am guessing it would be a hardware issue or prefer to come out with a new radio to sell. Maybe if allot of folks would ask this question to Alinco, we can get an answer.
 

racin06

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
719
Reaction score
114
Location
Westfield, Indiana
Below are short videos of the R30 and R15 on an AWOS located at Indianapolis Metropolitan Airport which is 8.5 miles from my home. The antenna used is the Radtel Airband Antenna, which is a great antenna for the price! Volume is set to 25 on both radios. ANL is enabled on both radios. The R15 is receiving one bar of signal, the R30 is receiving 2 bars. Though I really don't know if that is that relevant. The voice is clearly more audible on the R15 versus the R30. Also, my Alinco DJ-X100T detected nothing but noise.

R15 AWOS

R30 AWOS
 

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
3,620
Reaction score
1,773
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
Have noticed the audio being better on my R15 than the R30. Now if Icom could pull there head out of there arse and make a R30 replacement the size of the R15, Icom would rule the handheld receiver market.
 

racin06

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
719
Reaction score
114
Location
Westfield, Indiana
Have noticed the audio being better on my R15 than the R30. Now if Icom could pull there head out of there arse and make a R30 replacement the size of the R15, Icom would rule the handheld receiver market.
I sure hope Icom develops an R30 replacement (R40?). I would keep the current frequency range and analog modes the same, and add DMR, and Fusion to the current D-STAR, NXDN, and P25 digital modes. Also, add trunking capability! If Icom could do this, it would give Uniden a run for their money. I would pay $1500 for such a scanner/receiver. I can only dream 😀.
 

EuropeanUser

/\/\ember
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
33
Reaction score
16
I sure hope Icom develops an R30 replacement (R40?). I would keep the current frequency range and analog modes the same, and add DMR, and Fusion to the current D-STAR, NXDN, and P25 digital modes. Also, add trunking capability! If Icom could do this, it would give Uniden a run for their money. I would pay $1500 for such a scanner/receiver. I can only dream 😀.

I would also add TETRA because one can dream.
 

bcradio

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Messages
377
Reaction score
132
Location
Victoria BC
One QOL improvement that I think would be kind of easy to do is to have a dark mode… I’d use that all day long 200% of the time ;)
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,690
Reaction score
2,652
Location
California
Have noticed the audio being better on my R15 than the R30. Now if Icom could pull there head out of there arse and make a R30 replacement the size of the R15, Icom would rule the handheld receiver market.
I enjoy using the R30 keypad for direct frequency entry, quick key options and other features not available on the R15. The R30 is a receiver and the size is fine.

My valuation of the R15 remains at $300 or less. This is due to the other equipment I have and zero need for an R15. In a word: superfluous. Still, I am not advocating that the R15 is a poor device. Of course if one could control it remotely, like the R30, it would certainly increase my valuation for it.

IMG_0018.jpeg
 

eorange

♦RF Enabled Member♦
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
3,067
Reaction score
787
Location
Cleveland, OH
@vagrant I'm with you on the $300 valuation. My R30 is fantastic (plus I have R6s and R2s). While I love my icom handhelds...the R15 price continually makes me stop and think about what I'd be getting for my money. Only analog, no SSB, no keypad, and honestly that white background would be a problem after a while. It's priced nearly the same as the R30 was but with significant features missing vs possible minor performance gains over the R30. Not saying I'd never get one but not sure the value is there.
 

billpritjr

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
296
Reaction score
76
Location
Dallas, TX
does the R30 or R15 have a "close call" type of function or "frequency finder" type of capability, for nearby stations?

If yes, I may buy one
 

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
3,620
Reaction score
1,773
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
It does not. Receivers normally don’t have that function. The R30 is discontinued but if you can find one, get it. The best handheld receiver on the market. I’ve seen used ones go for a grand. For what you want, get the new uniden 150. Fantastic scanner. I hesitate as I was using my R30 to listen to P25. Did good but only phase 1. Both the R30 and 15 are real good on airband.
 
Last edited:

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
3,620
Reaction score
1,773
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
One thing that’s lacking on the R15 is it frequency coverage. Not sure why they didn’t start at 25 MHz. Maybe if allot of us owners email Icom to complain about that and ask for a firmware update, maybe they could do it. Another complaint is the temporary skip. 5 minutes sucks. I like how uniden does it. Uniden skip undoes it on shut off. While I’m at it, the menu system SUCKS. To many steps to do stuff. I like how the R30 menu system works. Anyone else have complaints?
 

bcradio

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Messages
377
Reaction score
132
Location
Victoria BC
One thing that’s lacking on the R15 is it frequency coverage. Not sure why they didn’t start at 25 MHz. Maybe if allot of us owners email Icom to complain about that and ask for a firmware update, maybe they could do it. Another complaint is the temporary skip. 5 minutes sucks. I like how uniden does it. Uniden skip undoes it on shut off. While I’m at it, the menu system SUCKS. To many steps to do stuff. I like how the R30 menu system works. Anyone else have complaints?
The temporary skip can be adjusted under the Settings>Scan menu, I have mine set to keep skipped until I power off and on.
 

Attachments

  • 20260124_185749.png
    20260124_185749.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 8

racin06

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
719
Reaction score
114
Location
Westfield, Indiana
I'm thoroughly enjoying my R15. I love my R30, but the R15 is even better on analog VHF/UHF. The R15 was developed to be the best VHF/UHF analog scanner/receiver on the market and it certainly meets my expectations monitoring air, rail, marine, amateur 2m/70cm bands, and others.

I'm also a motor sports fan and I frequently attend races including Indycar, NASCAR, and IMSA. The R15 will now be my go-to scanner at the race track. I really appreciate the R15's compact size. The R15 is worth every penny of it's $549 price.
 
Top