Is it time to fix the P25 Data?

ranger2004

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
294
Location
Utah
I think we have enough information on the new system to start naming and correcting the db.

For example:

Current label "Utah County Simulcast"
Should be called -- Lake Mountain Simulcast
--2 sites are Cedar Pass and Lake Mountain.
--then East Bench is a Multicast of the above.
(Not sure how to list the combo, but I think its very important to do so)

Then the 'BYU Kimball towers" and "West Mountain"
Should be -- Utah County Multicast
-- 2 sites BYU and West Mountain

Just one example of what it means.

Wasatch Simulcast Cell
– 3 Sites (Jordanelle, Quarry, Wasatch SO) <-- these 3 sites use the same frequencies on all sites.
--1 site Multicast Site: Sundance
Which is Sundance is repeating the same thing as the Simulcast but on different frequencies.

I will look at see what other States have done on RR..


Brett
 

gldavis

KE7MQF
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Messages
1,405
Location
Bountiful, UT
I have been using Unitrunker to decode/monitor several sites in my area (Bountiful), over the past couple weeks. I think I have enough info to start posting, and was trying to decide how to post what I've gotten. It is still early and there will be many changes/updates.
 

RaleighGuy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
13,331
Location
Raleigh, NC
Going through this with a new multi-site P25 system in my area, the best way to ensure an accurate database listing is compare the frequencies you find to FCC license information to ensure you have the correct license and site name. Then when you submit it to the database include the FCC license, site name, and back it up with the UT or DSD+ data.
 
Top