It's a province wide system with lord knows how many radios. What would you suggest be more affordable? Harris, Kenwood, etc wouldn't be any less.It still boggles my mind that we're spending $765 million on this project when we could be selecting something more affordable from another vendor. There must be a better product on the market that would have given us better, quicker and easier use.
I think a lot more of us will be logging RID's on LMRN. We may not be able to hear the fun and games but we can figure out what unit it on the air and what detachment it is from.I have logged almost 17000 different radio id's in zone 1 from my location
Logging the control channel data to a Web/Cloud Database from many different sites simultaneously would be pretty cool.I think a lot more of us will be logging RID's on LMRN. We may not be able to hear the fun and games but we can figure out what unit it on the air and what detachment it is from.
You're right that photo clearly shows V/U/7-8 GPS which is very obviously VHF, UHF, 700-800 and GPS.Are you sure that's dual band? There was another picture on their X feed (Nottawasaga detachment?) which clearly shows the antenna to be tri-band. This leads me to believe they have all band APX8K's.
View attachment 159333
It's a bit hilarious that MTO still uses the Callsigns from their old conventional analog radio system.2011 has units calling XJF445 London.
Yes I've seen a lot of docs etc that refer to it as LMRN (Land Mobile Radio Network). Maybe PSRN is a subset of LMRN, or vice versa. Or the project name changed at some point and the old name just didn't totally go away.
A few years ago, when the province was trying to centralize IT, they had a central IT shop and various IT Clusters of ministries.Yes I've seen a lot of docs etc that refer to it as LMRN (Land Mobile Radio Network). Maybe PSRN is a subset of LMRN, or vice versa. Or the project name changed at some point and the old name just didn't totally go away.