hotdjdave said:
How might this work (or not work) with the ever-growing and well established Los Angeles County ICIS?
There are a number of comments throughout the document about ICIS being a "model" for a countywide system. Part of the explanation for their primary recommendation of UHF voice and 800-mHz for data includes this (p 58):
"Between the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles, the two entities control 258 narrowband (12.5 kHz bandwidth) frequency pairs in the UHF band. This may be sufficient to construct a countywide shared trunked radio system for voice at UHF. ICIS and other users control at least 143 more. With this many frequencies, it may also be sufficient to construct a countywide mobile data system at UHF, as well. Alternatively, mobile data could be moved to 800 MHz. Between LAFD and LAPD and the Port of Los Angeles there are twenty-nine 800 MHz channels, which could be sufficient to construct a countywide mobile data system at 800 MHz. Non-public safety users that are now assigned to the 800 MHz trunked systems operated by the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles will remain where they are.
"The primary advantage to initially constructing the shared system at UHF is the larger pool of frequencies, and the fact that LAPD has a considerable amount of relatively new UHF infrastructure. It might be possible to upgrade LAPD's existing infrastructure instead of replacing it, potentially resulting in a large cost savings. The existing UHF shared trunked system in the Los Angeles area, ICIS, might also be modified and incorporated in some manner without requiring a complete system replacement. As described in the discussion of proprietary and standards-based trunked radio systems (Interoperability Level 4 and Level 5), a true standards-based shared radio system does not yet exist. Therefore, incorporation of ICIS (without modification) and re-use of existing LAPD infrastructure would demand that Motorola be the selected vendor."
Also see "interviews" with Burbank PD at p 125, Glendale PD/FD and ICIS people at p132 & 135, as well as pages 27, 37-38, 45, 53-55, 151, and information in Appendix F and K. Note that most of the data is now about a year old.
Keep in mind that this is a consultant's report and recommendation to the City of L.A,, and follows on their earlier report to LASD and LACoFD and others, and isn't necessarily a plan that anybody has adopted.