Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) - Master Thread

es93546

A Member Twice
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,602
Reaction score
1,064
Location
Right Side of CA on maps
With an antenna set on the roof of an 8-story building in East Hollywood, would it be possible to pick up LASD dispatch for Santa Clarita and Lancaster? The towers are based on Oat Mountain and Mt McDill, which are about 40-50 miles from my antenna, respectively.

You probably will find success with Oat Mountain, but a UHF signal for Lancaster will be blocked by the western edge of the San Gabriel Mountains. Most of the Palmdale/Lancaster area is carried by an electronic site on Hauser Peak, which is higher than anything else in the the valley area of the north county, but is low as compared to the San Gabriel Mtns.
 

PacScan

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2023
Messages
90
Reaction score
73
Location
Los Angeles
View attachment 174090LACO FIRE added 4 dispatch frequency digital
VVFIRE21 is active
Can confirm these patches are active (of course only when someone is affiliated with the site). 1067 was active on Downtown 700 tonight, clear audio, much better than what I hear over on the UHF freqs from my location.

I would honestly love to see every channel patched over, but then again it’s likely not going to be used by anyone but the admin side so not worth the trouble.
 

ScanFanEd

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
267
Reaction score
51
Location
Southern California
Hello Friends!

Just curious how some of you feel about the future monitoring opportunities of the LA-RICS system as it expands and completes. With the Big E always being an issue and on our minds, do we feel that there will always be enough in the clear to make it an enjoyable system to monitor or how concerned should we be? Thoughts?

Thanks!
 

Engine104

Member since 2005
Joined
Jul 6, 2005
Messages
619
Reaction score
291
Location
Winnetka, CA
Hello Friends!

Just curious how some of you feel about the future monitoring opportunities of the LA-RICS system as it expands and completes. With the Big E always being an issue and on our minds, do we feel that there will always be enough in the clear to make it an enjoyable system to monitor or how concerned should we be? Thoughts?

Thanks!
The "Big E", is what it is...LASD is the main reason most of us would want to monitor LA-RICS, and at this point, all of the L-TACS, A-TACS, etc are encrypted. Dispatch is supposed to remain in the clear for now. Dispatch is being simulcast on UHF so far. I mainly monitor LACoFD and they have taken over many conventional UHF frequencies that formerly belonged to the Sheriffs. I'm not rushing to buy a Phase-2 capable scanner until I see what is happening with the Ventura Co TRS.
 

kg6mvl

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Location
Saugus,CA
Hello I live in Santa Clarita & have an SDS100, I have programmed the LA-RICS system to my scanner but hear nothing. Can anyone help me ?
 

PacScan

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2023
Messages
90
Reaction score
73
Location
Los Angeles
Hello I live in Santa Clarita & have an SDS100, I have programmed the LA-RICS system to my scanner but hear nothing. Can anyone help me ?
Well, what are you trying to listen to?
90%+ of the traffic on the system is going to be encrypted
 

AM909

Radio/computer geek
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
1,619
Reaction score
672
Location
SoCal
You can only hear the non-encrypted traffic. If you look at the Mode column in the database here, "DE" means the talkgroup is completely encrypted, "De" means both encrypted and non-encrypted traffic may be heard, and "D" means it's all non-encrypted. There's not much non-encrypted traffic.

1006 ($3EE) was patched from County Fire dispatch as of a couple months ago.
 

kg6mvl

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Location
Saugus,CA
You can only hear the non-encrypted traffic. If you look at the Mode column in the database here, "DE" means the talkgroup is completely encrypted, "De" means both encrypted and non-encrypted traffic may be heard, and "D" means it's all non-encrypted. There's not much non-encrypted traffic.

1006 ($3EE) was patched from County Fire dispatch as of a couple months ago.
Yes I’m trying to listen monitor sheriff dispatch so according to this that is D which is digital not encrypted. Yet I don’t hear anything even though on Analog I hear audio something isn’t right but I dunno what !?
 

PacScan

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2023
Messages
90
Reaction score
73
Location
Los Angeles
Yes I’m trying to listen monitor sheriff dispatch so according to this that is D which is digital not encrypted. Yet I don’t hear anything even though on Analog I hear audio something isn’t right but I dunno what !?
LASD primary dispatch is still over on UHF. LA-RICS is used as an alternative option for dispatch talkgroups only at this point.
Subcategory: County Sheriff/Dispatch (Los Angeles County)
 

tsalmrsystemtech

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
1,632
Reaction score
362
LASD primary dispatch is still over on UHF. LA-RICS is used as an alternative option for dispatch talkgroups only at this point.
Subcategory: County Sheriff/Dispatch (Los Angeles County)
So is LASD just going to stay on UHF Analog for Dispatch another maybe a year or so? Wonder when they are going migrate Dispatch over. I think if dispatch is in the clear all the mobiles will be encrypted. Same concept as they have on UHF Analog with the birdie tones.

Have Dispatch on one talk group and the mobiles on the next talk group below each LASD station. I can see LASD doing this dispatch maybe in the clear and keep on having their mobiles stay locked down. I can see this approach unless I am wrong. It would make sense but The LASD is still over on Analog and L-TAC's been on LA-RICS for like a year or so now. You would think dispatch would do the cutover soon unless their are some technical difficulties Motorola is still working thru. Just do not know.

Wonder if there is any in sight to when dispatch would eventually cutover? LACOFD make the most bold move and stay on Analog UHF-2. Best decision ever made for a big fire department to want to stay on UHF-2 Analog. I bet it just works so beautiful too.
 

Engine104

Member since 2005
Joined
Jul 6, 2005
Messages
619
Reaction score
291
Location
Winnetka, CA
Good post. I was wondering the same thing about why LASD Dispatch hadn't moved over yet. I remember when LAPD moved to their digital uHF system, then kept the old VHF Hotshot channel (154.830, I think it was) going for a long while.
I applaud LACoFD's decision to take over LASD conventional UHF freqs. It seems to be working well. I hope the Ventura CoFD does the same when their new TRS is ready to go.
 

tsalmrsystemtech

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
1,632
Reaction score
362
If I was making decisions when it comes to staying on VHF High Band Analog and UHF-2 High Band in Analog I would raise my hand in a heart beat. Keep it simple and those bands in Analog UHF and VHF are so reliable and pierce dead spot areas that 700/800 trunking can't hit sometimes. Also, still having a zone or two for LA-RICS will be good too. But your main zones on your radio stay in Analog and re purpose some analog frequencies from the pool and its a good solid bet for the long run. Also, LACOFD covers the waters from Long Beach and Los Angeles ports to Catalina and maybe farther out. LA City is still on 800 mhz Analog too covering those waters too.

Nice solid decision making so far. Also, with interops and the quad band 8000 and the quad band NEXT you have all interops and other systems loaded with Trunking and all the other analog frequencies needed like Maritime VHF analog. Perfect. Coast Guard frequencies too

Honestly you have to give LACOFD big KUDOS for this move. It was in their best interest and whoever had this decision power and making is a very smart man or women. But still have access to LA-RICS as a secondary resort or as needed. Perfect. Quad Bands with VHF Tacs too. FPP for strike teams on the fly as a zone most likely. No more Bendix needed anymore. Everyone can do their comm plan in an FPP dedicated Zone with a sheet that is handed to each member. Do it yourself on the fly.
 

jrholm

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
592
Reaction score
53
Location
Big Bear
If I was making decisions when it comes to staying on VHF High Band Analog and UHF-2 High Band in Analog I would raise my hand in a heart beat. Keep it simple and those bands in Analog UHF and VHF are so reliable and pierce dead spot areas that 700/800 trunking can't hit sometimes. Also, still having a zone or two for LA-RICS will be good too. But your main zones on your radio stay in Analog and re purpose some analog frequencies from the pool and its a good solid bet for the long run. Also, LACOFD covers the waters from Long Beach and Los Angeles ports to Catalina and maybe farther out. LA City is still on 800 mhz Analog too covering those waters too.

Nice solid decision making so far. Also, with interops and the quad band 8000 and the quad band NEXT you have all interops and other systems loaded with Trunking and all the other analog frequencies needed like Maritime VHF analog. Perfect. Coast Guard frequencies too

Honestly you have to give LACOFD big KUDOS for this move. It was in their best interest and whoever had this decision power and making is a very smart man or women. But still have access to LA-RICS as a secondary resort or as needed. Perfect. Quad Bands with VHF Tacs too. FPP for strike teams on the fly as a zone most likely. No more Bendix needed anymore. Everyone can do their comm plan in an FPP dedicated Zone with a sheet that is handed to each member. Do it yourself on the fly.
Los Angeles County goes to the backside of San Clemente, which is a part of Los Angeles County. Just that the island is owned by the Navy so not much need to go on the island itself.
 
Top