Make an antenna with RG-58 for a Repeater

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
I Have RG-58 Feedline. I have to make an antenna for my repeater. What is the best antenna for a duplex repeater i can make out of this coax line? I am not looking to buy a real antenna yet unless necessary.

(Im looking to make a Dipole mounted 25 ft above my Chimney. Total height will be about 55ft.)

Repeater is 25Watts

TX 444.500 Mhz
RX 449.500 Mhz

-KB1VSP
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
Dipole Antenna Tuning

Well I know how to build a coax antenna... Strip the end of the cable so the center Transmission line is in the air Verticle. Then take the insulation and put it downward.

One thing i am not sure of is how long should it be? which will be most effective for transmitting and recieving on 444.5 / 449.5Mhz. and tuning it with SWR meter?
 

W2NJS

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
1,938
Location
Washington DC
234 divided by frequency in mHz = quarter wave for the frequency.
You don't pull the insulation down; you pull the shield down.
Cut the antenna for the transmit frequency.
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
These (Build A 9dB, 70cm Collinear Antenna) used to be popular, but the normal impedence isn't 50 ohm so some type of matching is required. The link provided uses toroids to do this matching. I've also seen specific lengths of RG-62 used to do this matching.

Be aware that the design makes the antenna itself very vulnerable to moisture so you need to be especially careful about taking care of this issue. The design also makes the antenna rather weak (strength wise) so it's important to provide sufficient support. In the attached link, they use a small dowel for support and some PCV pipe for support and water protection.

Remember that you'll also need the Velocity Factor for the specific coax you make the antenna from. This is an important factor in calculating the length of each section of the antenna. This value isn't hard to find on most name-brand coax, but may not be available for some cheap or off-brand coax (that often is from whichever supplier has the best price on the day it was delivered to the reseller).
 
Last edited:

LtDoc

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,145
Location
Oklahoma
An antenna made from that RG-58 isn't unreasonable. But what are you going to feed it with, more RG-58? That's not so good at 450 Mhz.
The same formula used for any antenna should also work for UHF. It might be a bit easier if you convert those results from feet to inches though. You'll still have to do the usual 'trimming' to get the lengths 'right' since none of those formula are exact by any means (usually a tad long, which is good).
- 'Doc
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
234 divided by frequency in mHz = quarter wave for the frequency.
You don't pull the insulation down; you pull the shield down.
Cut the antenna for the transmit frequency.

Oh Yes, that is what I meant to say. I leave the insulation and pull down the shielding.

Also if i do 234 divided by Frequency, 234 / 444.500 = 0.5264341957255343

So would it be 52 inches? or what would it be
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
I was planning on building the antenna with RG-58 and trim it to be the right lenth tuned to my frequency. Then run RG-58 about 100ft to the duplexer on the repeater.

Any suggestions on problems i will face doing this?
trying to have the least amount of loss as possible and for it to work well...
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
Oh, and I have a housing from an old VHF Marine antenna. This is where i will put the coax antenna in. This will keep it dry.
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,741
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The only suggestion I have is don't bother putting up a repeater and feeding it with 100ft of RF-58, especially with a home made unity gain antenna. The end result for all your effort would be like painting your house using a Q-tip.

The formula 234/frequency will give you the length in feet and tenths of a foot, or a little over 6" for 444MHz.
prcguy



I was planning on building the antenna with RG-58 and trim it to be the right lenth tuned to my frequency. Then run RG-58 about 100ft to the duplexer on the repeater.

Any suggestions on problems i will face doing this?
trying to have the least amount of loss as possible and for it to work well...
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
The only suggestion I have is don't bother putting up a repeater and feeding it with 100ft of RF-58, especially with a home made unity gain antenna. The end result for all your effort would be like painting your house using a Q-tip.

The formula 234/frequency will give you the length in feet and tenths of a foot, or a little over 6" for 444MHz.
prcguy

What should I do? My antenna is going to be 50ft in the air, and then i have to run like another 50ft to the repeater. If i were to move the repeater near the antennas then i can then run only 50 feet of cable to the antenna. What will work? Im on a low buget
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,996
Location
Sector 001
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9780; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.600 Mobile Safari/534.8+)

Use better feedline. LMR400 or equivalent at the minimum. At 100' you will get almost zip for power out and just the same for receive, RG-58 coax has so much loss at Uhf that you will have a very deaf repeater that can't be heard very far away. I would suggest googleing 'coax loss chart' or something similar to that and see what the actual loss of a variety of different coax is. If you look around you may even be able to find a loss calculator.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9780; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.600 Mobile Safari/534.8+)

Use better feedline. LMR400 or equivalent at the minimum. At 100' you will get almost zip for power out and just the same for receive, RG-58 coax has so much loss at Uhf that you will have a very deaf repeater that can't be heard very far away. I would suggest googleing 'coax loss chart' or something similar to that and see what the actual loss of a variety of different coax is. If you look around you may even be able to find a loss calculator.

Man, I just bought 200ft of RG-58. but thanks for the info. I guess I have to find other cable.

But is 50ft still bad for RG-58 cable?

Ok and if I buy this LMR 400 cable (Found it good price) would i make a RG58 antenna and LMR400 feedline?

is LMR 50 ohms?
 
Last edited:

OCO

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
928
Location
Central Michigan
Wanted:
1 ELMER, preferably with patience module, for immediate use in the Milford area. Optional Wouf Hong accessory recommended...
 

LtDoc

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,145
Location
Oklahoma
What the man is saying is that you need some more education about radio stuff in general before tackling a repeater project. An 'elmer' is someone who helps you in getting that education/information needed.

That length of a 1/4 wave, 234 divided by the frequency in Mhz gives a result in 'feet'. So multiply the result by 12 to get inches. That 0.5264341957255343 feet turns into 6.317 inches. Or about 6 and 5/16th inches.
- 'Doc
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
Man, I just bought 200ft of RG-58. but thanks for the info. I guess I have to find other cable.

But is 50ft still bad for RG-58 cable?

Ok and if I buy this LMR 400 cable (Found it good price) would i make a RG58 antenna and LMR400 feedline?

is LMR 50 ohms?

Check here for answers to your various coax loss questions. Coax Loss Calculator

50' of RG-58 will get you 4.833 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 16.431 effective watts at the antenna.
100' of RG-58 will get you 9.666 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 5.4 effective watts at the antenna.
50' of LMR-400 will get you 1.343 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 36.699 effective watts at the antenna.
100' of LMR-400 will get you 2.686 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 26.937 effective watts at the antenna.
50' of Andrew LDF4-50A will get you 0.725 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 42.317 effective watts at the antenna.
100' of Andrew LDF4-50A will get you 1.449 dB loss at 449.5 MHz, 50 Watts from the duplexer gives you 35.815 effective watts at the antenna.

Please note that many pros report serious issues with LMR-400 (actually the whole LMR family) in duplex applications due to issues with PIM (passive intermod). Times Microwave does make some Low-PIM coax (the LMR-SW series) which runs about twice the cost of the similar sized regular LMR coax, but isn't nearly as easy to find.

The Andrew LDF4-50A is an industry standard coax for repeater use. It has great loss numbers, easy to find (connectors are easy to locate as well), and most pros are quite familiar working with it. Since it's a standard commercial grade coax it will be permitted on most shared tower sites, while LMR may not and RG-58 nearly always won't. It isn't cheap though, but you may find it used in fairly short runs (100' may qualify) new as an end-of-reel lot for fairly good prices.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
211
Yes good information... I think i am going to go with the LDF4-50A cable. Its expensive so i am going to relocate the repeater to near the antenna so I will only need like 50 feet... This sucks because I am only running 25watts from a pair of Maxtracs as a repeater. So I guess i am going to have to buy an amplifier, and a preamp. Ill go with like 50Watts

and I found a cable... Any suggestions on what to do after i get the cable?

ANDREW LDF4-50A HELIAX FOAM CABLE 60 FT. | eBay


once i get it can i use RG58 for antenna and that for the feedline?
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
1,217
Location
Tulsa
With a UHF repeater your effective antenna height becomes the critical issue, using LDF 4-50 is an excellent solution, does the coax on eBay include the connectors already attached to the line; the correct connectors are expensive and if you haven;t ever installed the connectors it can be tricky. Forget trying to cobble an antenna out of RG58, you can make a 1/4 wave ground plane for a few bucks. 20-25 Watts is reasonable on UHF instead of adding an external power amplifier you would be better served by buying a commercial antenna with 6-9 dB of gain vs. adding a amplifier, plus the antenna gain would also benefit the receive signal. At the end of the day at the height you are dealing with don't expect more than a few miles of range for a mobile and less for a portable. To put up a successful repeater is a challenge and can be expensive.

How are you going to control your repeater in order to comply with the relevent FCC rules?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top