• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Motorola systems saber software

Korn8579

Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2025
Messages
2
Hello, what version of the motorola programming software would i have to obtain to program my motorola systems saber radio?
 

ElroyJetson

Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,985
Location
Somewhere between the Scylla and Charybdis
The Systems Saber RSS, of course. It runs under DOS and you'll be lucky if it runs under Windows XP on a 486 class CPU. I would not bet on it working properly on any computer that is newer/more modern than that, unless you have no intention of actually reading from the radio or writing to it.
 

Korn8579

Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2025
Messages
2
The Systems Saber RSS, of course. It runs under DOS and you'll be lucky if it runs under Windows XP on a 486 class CPU. I would not bet on it working properly on any computer that is newer/more modern than that, unless you have no intention of actually reading from the radio or writing to it.
okay, thanks
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,467
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The Systems Saber RSS, of course. It runs under DOS and you'll be lucky if it runs under Windows XP on a 486 class CPU. I would not bet on it working properly on any computer that is newer/more modern than that, unless you have no intention of actually reading from the radio or writing to it.
It works fine on my 75MHz 386. Does anyone under 50yrs old even know DOS commands these days?
 

mbnv992

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
696
Location
AZ
It’s funny - my PC runs my standard Saber and MT1000 RSS just fine but does NOT like my Systems Saber RSS. I have 3 Systems Saber radios and I can’t read any of them. IMG_7688.jpeg
 

DotNM

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
39
Location
Watchung, New Jersey
It works fine on my 75MHz 386. Does anyone under 50yrs old even know DOS commands these days?
I'll be 40 tomorrow and I know DOS. I started with a 66 MHz 386 with like 4 or 8 MB of RAM (can't remember exactly, I just remember we had to upgrade to 16 MB of RAM to be able to get internet access from our local ISP) running DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.11 #memorylane
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,467
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I'll be 40 tomorrow and I know DOS. I started with a 66 MHz 386 with like 4 or 8 MB of RAM (can't remember exactly, I just remember we had to upgrade to 16 MB of RAM to be able to get internet access from our local ISP) running DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.11 #memorylane
Wow 66MHz and 16M RAM, you were living in the fast lane. My first actual PC that I eventually used for some early Motorola stuff was a 12MHz 286 with 10mb hard drive, brand new on the market at the time and cost me $2,175 with a company discount through a friend. I was a mad man with a RIB programming HT600s, M208s, M216s and eventually Sabers and Spectras.

I recently came across a few floppies that have +/- 10MHz extended frequency range for the Saber called LAPD Saber. I remember paying a guy to do the same thing to System Saber and also Visar software back then.
 

Project25_MASTR

Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,571
Location
Texas
I know DOS decently. I'm 33.

I've got a 386 around here somewhere...mainly use MS-DOS 7.1 on a Centrino laptop for programming these days (laptop also boots Windows 10 but that's a different story).
 

ElroyJetson

Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,985
Location
Somewhere between the Scylla and Charybdis
D04+/-10M was the name (an alternate name) of that Saber software with the 10 MHz frequency range extension.
My favorite trick was simply to program an H43 Saber as an H33 model which instantly gave you a much wider bandsplit. Power output didn't really suffer much, not that I noticed anyway, when operating out of the PA module's bandsplit range.
I'm kind of surprised that I haven't actually committed all possible Saber bandsplits to memory. At one time I had, but can't recall some of them now.
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,693
Location
Hubert, NC
My Tough book CF30 runs Systems Saber RSS just fine, but I boot to DOS using a Win98 startup disc. Once in DOS, I change directories to my MRSS folder and boom, it works great.

I used to have it dual booted, so I'd select DOS or Windows 7 during boot up, but there was a Windows update that broke it and I was too lazy to make it work again, hence why I just leave the Win98 disc in the tray. I do have the OS disc split into two partitions, one for Windows and one for DOS. You do not need an old 386 or 486, but you do need to run it in pure DOS, not a DOS Box or other emulator.

Good luck.
 

mbnv992

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
696
Location
AZ
My Tough book CF30 runs Systems Saber RSS just fine, but I boot to DOS using a Win98 startup disc. Once in DOS, I change directories to my MRSS folder and boom, it works great.

I used to have it dual booted, so I'd select DOS or Windows 7 during boot up, but there was a Windows update that broke it and I was too lazy to make it work again, hence why I just leave the Win98 disc in the tray. I do have the OS disc split into two partitions, one for Windows and one for DOS. You do not need an old 386 or 486, but you do need to run it in pure DOS, not a DOS Box or other emulator.

Good luck.
What Version Systems Saber RSS do you have ?
 

mbnv992

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
696
Location
AZ
R04.00.02 - 07 Oct 1994. Sorry for the crappy picture. It was easier to just take a pic of the screen on the CF30.
That’s the one I wish I had. I think my laptop would read my radio with that RSS. I have this much older RSS that won’t communicate with the radio IMG_7690.jpeg
 

ElroyJetson

Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,985
Location
Somewhere between the Scylla and Charybdis
As I remember, the oldest RSS titles were written for the 8250 UART serisl controller chip, which became obsolete and was replaced by the 16 bit 16550 UART serial controller chip somewhere in the 386 era. Those old RSS titles didn't rely on Windows to handle the serial interface, and thus if the chip in the PC is not the type they were written for, the serial port doesn't work.


That's how I remember it. Not saying I'm strictly 100 percent accurate about this. Not even sure I'm 1 percent accurate, to be quite honest about it.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,545
Location
Central Indiana
According to Google's AI, "The 8250 has a single-byte buffer, while the 16550 has a 16-byte FIFO buffer." You'd think that software designed for the 8250 would work OK with a 16550, and much of it did. But, there's probably more to the story than just the buffers.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,545
Location
Central Indiana
I found other sources which back up the buffer size difference between the 8250 and 16550. Next time, I won't mention what AI said so as to not trigger you. ;)
 
Top