Kenwood: New Kenwood TH-D75

Kenwood TH-D75

  • I'm really looking forward to buying this radio.

    Votes: 16 14.2%
  • May consider buying this radio and some point.

    Votes: 46 40.7%
  • Not interested in this radio.

    Votes: 27 23.9%
  • D-Star is dead, Jim.

    Votes: 24 21.2%

  • Total voters
    113
  • Poll closed .

wd9ewk

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
160
Location
Arizona USA
Hi!

Things lined up for me yesterday to finally try my TH-D75 with the 145.825 MHz ISS packet/APRS digipeater. That digipeater had been off-line for a while, and recently operating with different settings (145.800 MHz instead of 145.825 MHz, using RS0ISS as the packet path instead of the normal ARISS path). And it was a weekend without work!

I was out at the DM52/DM53 grid line working satellites yesterday, along US-70 near Safford AZ (southeast of Phoenix, northeast of Tucson), and had a couple of ISS passes around the middle of the day. I worked the FM repeater on the first ISS pass I had that went to my east, and then tried the digipeater on the later pass. It seems like the TH-D75 did better decoding packets, especially near the start and end of passes. Otherwise, its functionality is almost identical to the TH-D74 for packet (not a surprise).

Rather than duplicating what I already wrote, here's a link to those posts:


73!
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,748
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Got mine yesterday and am glad I did. First impressions is a nice cosmetic upgrade, PTT button feels more solid. Downloaded the FREE D75 MCP and RCP. I loaded her up with local repeater and my HotSpot and went to town. The audio coming out of this is quite a bit louder and fuller than the D74. Will spend some time with the RCP software and report back.

Performance is excellent and this radio is worth every penny. It is a QUALITY subscriber unit from a heritage company that builds QUALITY subscriber radios. If cheap hams cry about $749 being pricey, they'd lose their minds over what REAL radios cost. I own a Kenwood VP8000 with is their top tier P25/DMR multi-band portable and I paid $3300 out of pocket for it- which is about half of what agency pricing is. Hams have little clue how much quality LMR stuff really costs.

I have an ID-52 and I like the Kenwood form factor better.
 

AF1UD

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Messages
330
Got mine yesterday and am glad I did. First impressions is a nice cosmetic upgrade, PTT button feels more solid. Downloaded the FREE D75 MCP and RCP. I loaded her up with local repeater and my HotSpot and went to town. The audio coming out of this is quite a bit louder and fuller than the D74. Will spend some time with the RCP software and report back.

Performance is excellent and this radio is worth every penny. It is a QUALITY subscriber unit from a heritage company that builds QUALITY subscriber radios. If cheap hams cry about $749 being pricey, they'd lose their minds over what REAL radios cost. I own a Kenwood VP8000 with is their top tier P25/DMR multi-band portable and I paid $3300 out of pocket for it- which is about half of what agency pricing is. Hams have little clue how much quality LMR stuff really costs.

I have an ID-52 and I like the Kenwood form factor better.
How's the battery life? Or are there aftermarket batteries?
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,748
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
How's the battery life? Or are there aftermarket batteries?
Ran it all day out of the box, so I got a solid 9 hours of use with no battery saver and A LOT of TX time on L1-M power on VHF/UHF. Uses the same batteries as the D74. I have a couple of KSC-25LS chargers that I use with my NX-3200 LMR radios so I have drop in chargers already. Will probably be buying a second battery.
 

palmerjrusa

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
1,263
Location
Frederick
Got mine yesterday and am glad I did. First impressions is a nice cosmetic upgrade, PTT button feels more solid. Downloaded the FREE D75 MCP and RCP. I loaded her up with local repeater and my HotSpot and went to town. The audio coming out of this is quite a bit louder and fuller than the D74. Will spend some time with the RCP software and report back.

Performance is excellent and this radio is worth every penny. It is a QUALITY subscriber unit from a heritage company that builds QUALITY subscriber radios. If cheap hams cry about $749 being pricey, they'd lose their minds over what REAL radios cost. I own a Kenwood VP8000 with is their top tier P25/DMR multi-band portable and I paid $3300 out of pocket for it- which is about half of what agency pricing is. Hams have little clue how much quality LMR stuff really costs.

I have an ID-52 and I like the Kenwood form factor better.

Now the question is, do I sell my D74 and go for the upgrade...
 

eorange

♦RF Enabled Member♦
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
3,028
Location
Cleveland, OH
I can't believe the D75 would be significantly better in that regard compared to the D74 or most other big 3 transceivers. After all, we're only talking about FM, D-STAR, and APRS.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,088
Location
Central Indiana
Here are the published receive sensitivity specifications for the TH-D75. I would expect individual radios to meet or exceed the published specs when tested with calibrated equipment. The first column of specs is for Band A and the second column is for Band B.
1712667304325.png

Note that 0.2 µV is pretty much the standard for superheterodyne VHF/UHF radios.
 

Attachments

  • 1712667471917.png
    1712667471917.png
    20.1 KB · Views: 2

palmerjrusa

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
1,263
Location
Frederick
Had the TH-D75 for a few days now.

The radio has solid feel to it, no slight looseness detected between the radio and the battery as is present in my TH-D74 and that others have also noted.

The TH-D75's key backlight is now white as opposed to orange in the TH-D74. Aesthetically, I prefer the orange backlit keypad, however, the white backlit keypad is easier to read in the dark so functionality triumphs over aesthetics.

The TH-D75's sensitivity re the military aviation UHF band is not great, notably inferior to my IC-R30s and seems to be even a tad below my AR-DV10.
 

N4DJC

Active Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
868
Location
Upstate
Had the TH-D75 for a few days now.

The radio has solid feel to it, no slight looseness detected between the radio and the battery as is present in my TH-D74 and that others have also noted.

The TH-D75's key backlight is now white as opposed to orange in the TH-D74. Aesthetically, I prefer the orange backlit keypad, however, the white backlit keypad is easier to read in the dark so functionality triumphs over aesthetics.

The TH-D75's sensitivity re the military aviation UHF band is not great, notably inferior to my IC-R30s and seems to be even a tad below my AR-DV10.

I love my D75A, I never expected it to perform well outside the amateur bands. The BCD160DN beats it easily for aviation and general scanning. Kenwood could have left all the wide band features out as far as I'm concerned.
 

N4SRN

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
89
Location
Bedford, NH
D75 BT pairing works with my Samsung Galaxy Tab A tablet but not with my Google Pixel 7a phone, or at least the few times I’ve tried it. Might there be any trick to pairing I’ve missed? Perhaps reboots, BT on/off, sequence of steps, etc?

BRET/N4SRN
 

N4SRN

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
89
Location
Bedford, NH
Top