•Added 'search for objects' via Fn+9
DEAR WHISTLER,
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, ..................................................... [infinity]....
Holy smokes does that make life easy!!!
Hallelujah!!
When they going to make the alphatags work like a cellphone keypad?
When entering alphatags its difficult the way it is.
They should make it like this
tap the number 2
1st result A
2nd result B
3rd result C
4th result 2
this way its quick and simple to enter Alphatags in that mode (programming the alphatags)
Yep, this is a big one for me to! It takes me what seems like hours to enter in a simple alpha text with their "key saving method" that does not conform to any other equipment I have ever used.
The whistler method is "interesting", but it does not work very well. We need this to go back to the regular method everyone else uses.
Probably never. Conservation of keystrokes.
The existing, 10-year-old method (inherited from the PSR-500) takes exactly 2 keystrokes to enter any letter, number, or symbol. (Toggling between upper and lowercase or between the two symbol sets is another keystroke (the Fn key)).
Your description above does not include lowercase. Would the sequence be like my stupid Panasonic cordless phone: A-B-C-a-b-c-2 ? Five keystrokes to enter 'b'? Then, to move to the next character position, I hit an arrow key, wait for a timeout, or start using a different key?
For example, if I want to enter "DGLS SO CH A", and presuming the . (decimal) key enters a space:
Your method would be 25 keystrokes (1-4 for each letter, 1 for each space):
345557777.7777666.22244.2
On the TRX, it's 21 keystrokes (2 for each letter, 1 for each space):
31745374.7463.2342.21
It might conserve keystrokes, BUT you need to move your fingers around on the keypad more than twice as much. Instead of picking a key and pressing it once, twice or three times, you instead need to pick the key and hit it once, then move your fat finger out of way to figure out/find the next key either 1, 2 or 3... and then move you finger to it and press it. It takes less keystrokes to do, but a longer timeframe to accomplish. Added up the time for 25 keystrokes vs 21 keystrokes in your example and you will find the method the rest of the planet uses is much easier and faster.
That, and the fact we are all "used to" the regular method. So every time I pick up the whistler and try to type something I have to "re-learn" entering text.... very annoying.
If there are people like yourself who like the current "whistler method" (which I'd bet they are few and far between), they should be able to get both methods working and allow the user to choose in settings which text entry method they want to user.
I'll be adding ASCII IO to libtrx (
http://forums.radioreference.com/whistler-scanners/349122-trx-2-maybe-trx-1-cross-platform-api.html). Meaning you can just connect the USB cable, execute the upcoming "trxtype" app.
The program will first pause, user inserts ascii, program saves, and unpauses. So with this, it's one keystroke
.
I have to go check that link out... what is this? Sounds interesting...