I just wanted to correct the above statement because my mind was focused on 60 second videos when I replied. (It's too late to edit my prior post)
The FM vs FMN video is part of a series I'm calling "Two Minute Tech Tips", which is exactly what it sounds like.
So even though I have 2x the amount of time to explain things than I said prior, a lot of the info still remained edited out.
What have I learned so far? That 1 or 2 minutes is not enough time to *fully* talk about a topic. But - there are many out there that want direct and do the point answers and I will try to help those people as well. Many don't want to hear the science behind something. It bores them and makes their eyes roll in their heads. Delivering on the information quickly will help them learn.
The great thing about making content and putting videos online, is that there are many different ways to share the same information. So while I just skimmed the surface of FM in 2 minutes, this still gives me an opportunity to create a 2nd or 3rd (or more) videos to explain even more on the topic. Or - I can also go back and remove the "offending" video and replace it at a later date with an updated version on the topic.
A HUGE issue I found while podcasting for nearly 5 years is that most of the times, when I review the podcast before publishing, I always wished that I added another example, changed the way I explained something, or had another idea to add. But - if we continuously sit there and modify the content, it would never be released since there is always room for improvement. And that is what makes any hobby fun
. There is always something new to learn, to try, and to experiment with.
