1535 - "On TDFM" National Guard Aviation ROUGE Ops
NJICS Municipal Migration Discussion - Statewide
- Thread starter Analogrules
- Start date
-
- Tags
- sticky
4825 - Union County/Mountain Valley Communications - Mutual Aid Fire Requests
This is an educated guess, could be entirely wrong, but probably Theater Detention Facility McGuire. Likely MP's undergoing training. 367th MP Company (Army NG) usually does TDF training at McGuire twice a year around March and August.
You locals may be able to ID them better.
4927 - "Springfield calling Hillside on the ops channel"
5627 - Robinsville Twp Police Dispatch?
5209 - Traffic stop. HWY49 "On the bridge between Salem & Pennsville"
5497 - Sussex Co DPW "On North"
5621 - Something COM? Broken traffic.
5623 - Unit 7506. COM 8?? Again a little broken.
4927 - "Springfield calling Hillside on the ops channel"
5627 - Robinsville Twp Police Dispatch?
5209 - Traffic stop. HWY49 "On the bridge between Salem & Pennsville"
5497 - Sussex Co DPW "On North"
5621 - Something COM? Broken traffic.
5623 - Unit 7506. COM 8?? Again a little broken.
I'm getting TGID 5209 as encrypted.
richee2000
Communications. Breaking News. Photography
what Site?
I logged it on Berlin fully encrypted as well. UIDs 600xxx
Some unknown TGIDs logged on the Cumberland County Simulcast with Cumberland County UIDs today.
As mentioned before TGID 5209 is encrypted, its using UID 600323 and thats Cumberland County
TGID 3468 with a UID 614005 looks like more Cumberland County in the Fire/EMS range.
TGID 3477 with UID 600127 more Cumberland County in the Fire/EMS range.
So should I be using UniTrunker instead of ProScan?
As mentioned before TGID 5209 is encrypted, its using UID 600323 and thats Cumberland County
TGID 3468 with a UID 614005 looks like more Cumberland County in the Fire/EMS range.
TGID 3477 with UID 600127 more Cumberland County in the Fire/EMS range.
So should I be using UniTrunker instead of ProScan?
Logged this in the clear last night from 18:00 to 21:00 on Berlin Simulcast, UIDs 2550505, 2550510 & 2550538
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 2,057
Berkeley Heights. With the addition of new sub-site on Site 7 we now have Berkeley Heights PD on a UC TG. It has been patched to old UHF T band (poor audio).
I suspect the assignment is temporary until a plan to re- program the fleet is developed. Coverage is good.
Waiting on DB Sub for the final TG. Still looking for the Fire Department.
I suspect the assignment is temporary until a plan to re- program the fleet is developed. Coverage is good.
Waiting on DB Sub for the final TG. Still looking for the Fire Department.
| 4319 | 10df | T | UC Interop 6 | County Interop 6 & BH PD | Interop |
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 2,057
Union County OEM runs a BLS division support other BLS efforts in Union County.
There are now 16 licensed units. The DB for sometime has not properly reflected the TG in use. I have made a DB submission to update the description.
4273 County BLS Units by OEM EMS Dispatch
There are now 16 licensed units. The DB for sometime has not properly reflected the TG in use. I have made a DB submission to update the description.
4273 County BLS Units by OEM EMS Dispatch
Last edited:
The talkgroup is correct as listed. UCEMS is run by County OEM, and is dispatched on the County OEM Dispatch talkgroup. Any change would create an inaccurate listing, as the same talkgroup is used to dispatch and handle operations of ALL OEM units. UCEMS is just the most active and prolific user.
richee2000
Communications. Breaking News. Photography
TG 5691 testing on Monmouth Site, did not catch RIDs. After testing: "switch back to PD1"
I have been catching it on Unitrunker. ID's are 2355xxx
They are also on 5689, which is probably PD1
Those would be old MONOC ID's, so I would imagine probably REMU?
Yeah so, changes were made to the listing based on rr60's submission. If the updated description is truly counterproductive, I'll need another submission to correct/revert it. Just note that we want to keep all of these listings "short and sweet" and the easiest for casual end-users to understand. If "regular OEM" units comprise only a very small percentage of activity on that talkgroup, whereas 95%+ activity is the BLS units, then the description should lean heavily towards the BLS functionality. God forbid they just use the regular County EMS talkgroups.
Okay so in a feeble attempt at a compromise, I've renamed the talkgroup (yet again) to try to capture the OEM and EMS aspect. I'm not a huge fan of the Multi-Dispatch service tag, but in this case it seems appropriate.
| 4273 | UC OEM/BLS EMS | County OEM/BLS EMS Dispatch | Multi-Dispatch |
Just to be clear, there was no sarcasm or disrespect intended in my response. I was genuinely acknowledging your guidance as an admin. Sorry if it came off wrong.
