• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

NMO mount antennas

FPR1981

Active Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
621
If I possessed the talent to cut a clean hole into a vehicle and run the coax neatly, you bet your back side that my vehicles would have Larsen NMO 30's with the appropriate mast size. But I don't, so magnet mounts rule the day.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,726
Location
United States
If I possessed the talent to cut a clean hole into a vehicle and run the coax neatly, you bet your back side that my vehicles would have Larsen NMO 30's with the appropriate mast size. But I don't, so magnet mounts rule the day.

Nothing at all wrong with that.
Having the right tools and skills takes money and time. Not everyone wants to invest in that stuff. If the magnetic mounts allow you to talk to who you want, then it's working 100%.

On the other hand, keep your eyes open, and you may run across someone local to you that would be happy to assist. Many ham operators have the right tools. 3/4" hole saw, coax crimpers and a simple antenna analyzer isn't uncommon.
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,176
Location
Southeastern Michigan
On the other hand, keep your eyes open, and you may run across someone local to you that would be happy to assist. Many ham operators have the right tools. 3/4" hole saw, coax crimpers and a simple antenna analyzer isn't uncommon.

Quick note: See some of mmckenna's previous posts, to see the correct type of hole saw. (Not the one you get at your favorite home improvement store.)
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,831
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I know for a fact you could make a nice hole and do a good install with maybe 2 minutes of instruction, don't think you can't do it.

If I possessed the talent to cut a clean hole into a vehicle and run the coax neatly, you bet your back side that my vehicles would have Larsen NMO 30's with the appropriate mast size. But I don't, so magnet mounts rule the day.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,831
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Maybe if you have all day to do an install but a professional installer would never use one. A Home Depot 3/4" hole saw makes a perfectly good hole for an NMO and you can put in 20 or more roof mount antennas a day with that compared to maybe 10 with a punch because you have to remove so much stuff to get the hole punch up inside the headliner. I think I tried a hole punch once in the 1970s and moved on.

Greenlee knockouts are better than hole saws.
 

ForestRunner98

917 SoCal
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Messages
42
I used a HF step bit and it worked great! It’s kinda scary at first but after the pilot hole is done just keep going forward. Can’t turn back.

I was actually surprised how easy it was!!! Besides the small gain I would get from a permanent mount would be the appearance and most importantly safety. I didn’t want a huge magmount to take flight in case of an accident or hard brake. Those are my reasons.

1E54AA0D-9959-4DF4-9DF9-90367383F87D.jpeg

172E7D76-EF0C-42C5-A2AD-77C6FF309B56.jpeg

Hmm..not sure why ^ that pic is sideways.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,726
Location
United States
Greenlee knockouts are better than hole saws.

I have a 3/4" knock out punch, and it's been handy on a few occasions.
But as prcguy said, it can take longer to do the work since you need access to both sides of the sheet metal. Not always possible on a mobile install.

The DeWalt brand 3/4" hole saw designed for steel works really well. Got in a pinch once and left my hole saw in the office. A quick trip by Home Depot got me what I needed and finished the job just fine.

The step bits (aka Christmas Tree bits) are sketchy. They can grab if you are not careful. Not something an inexperienced person should be trying. The nice benefit to the true NMO hole saws is that they have a depth limitation design, so no risk of going to deep and damaging the headliner.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,831
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
With some minor experience you learn to adjust the pilot bit to only stick beyond the hole saw about 1/8" and you develop a method of pushing down on the pistol grip of the drill with one hand while holding the pistol grip hand back with the other hand with the elbow resting on the roof so the saw doesn't jump through the finished hole. You can saw holes all day long in car roofs and only penetrate a fraction of an inch and not grab anything.

The other trick is to only pull down the rubber door seal from roughly even front to back with the hole to be cut in the roof and down the front or rear pillar where the coax will run. Then slide a chunk of long thin plastic maybe 1/16 to 1/8" thick and a foot wide up between the headliner and roof to catch debris and to prevent the saw from touching the headliner. With that you can cut the hole, put in an NMO mount center of roof and run the coax under the dash and have the car back together in about 5min. Add another 2min to strip the coax, put on a crimp connector and seal up with some heat shrink. 7 minutes after you started your on the air mobile.

I have a 3/4" knock out punch, and it's been handy on a few occasions.
But as prcguy said, it can take longer to do the work since you need access to both sides of the sheet metal. Not always possible on a mobile install.

The DeWalt brand 3/4" hole saw designed for steel works really well. Got in a pinch once and left my hole saw in the office. A quick trip by Home Depot got me what I needed and finished the job just fine.

The step bits (aka Christmas Tree bits) are sketchy. They can grab if you are not careful. Not something an inexperienced person should be trying. The nice benefit to the true NMO hole saws is that they have a depth limitation design, so no risk of going to deep and damaging the headliner.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
2,978
Location
Fort Worth
What meets “needs”:

Needs are not desires
Confusion abounds with this.

CB performance will have been a function of experienced use at some early point.

Mag Mount susceptibility to damage will render it unusable, forgoing long term experience AND what was needed the very next day. (Spares must be carried).

When it matters, the antenna system will have mattered most.

One does not want the family Conestoga with all aboard . . and ratty coax draped loose.

.
 
Last edited:

spikestabber

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
67
Location
Toronto
Thanks all, loved reading this thread as it gave me some great ideas.
Loved CB since I was a kid a good 30 years ago, still enjoy having one in my car hearing whats going on around the highways. Getting the urge to want one again was because of this forum. Here's my setup, hope it inspires others. :)
 

Attachments

  • 20211108_085309.jpg
    20211108_085309.jpg
    92.7 KB · Views: 40

KA0XR

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
126
Location
Minnesota
Just discovered this thread. I am intrigued with the idea of pairing the Larsen NMO30 with the W640 whip but I would be wanting to use it mainly for 10 meters instead (but also wanting to have the option to at least monitor CB). This would be a way to "resurrect' the Laird CW27 antenna with its 67" long whip which has been discontinued.

Any thoughts on whether the Larsen NMO34 would actually be the better coil for 10 meters vs. the NMO30? I figure that to achieve resonance at a center frequency of ~28.8 MHz using the NMO30, a good portion of the 65" whip would need to cut off vs. using the NMO34, reducing overall efficiency.

I don't see why the W640 whip couldn't be paired with a non-loaded spring base coil for VHF high band like the one made by PC-Tel/Maxrad, cut to ~56" or so, and then be a resonant quarter wave on 6 meters.
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,176
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Just looking at this thread again. Has anyone tried the longer (W640) whip with the NMO27? Based on the comments with cut charts, it sounds like it would be much too long, and have to be trimmed to the point of the shorter whip.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,831
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Just looking at this thread again. Has anyone tried the longer (W640) whip with the NMO27? Based on the comments with cut charts, it sounds like it would be much too long, and have to be trimmed to the point of the shorter whip.
A longer whip would have to be trimmed to the same length as a stock whip so I don’t see any advantage unless the new whip is thicker. If you get a higher freq coil like 30 or 34MHz as mentioned in post 52 then you can make use of a longer whip and improve efficiency.
 

steve9570

Member WSAG-457 -KB1-KZW- KCP-2441 CB-WA1-BZG
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
254
Location
Natick Ma
I just had to buy a new bedroom A/C and had to remove the 2 NMO mag mounts to reinstall on the new A/C. Those NMOs have been on that A/C for over 30 years and still work like new!

They have seen LOT Mass snow storms and summer heat and keep on working,

Steve
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,726
Location
United States
Is there a recommended spring that can be used with the Larson NMO30 and the 64" whip?

You can insert one of those between the base and the coil. You will have to shorten the whip by an appropriate amount since the spring becomes part of the radiating element. The antenna whip cut charts usually include a measurement for "without spring" and "with spring".
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,726
Location
United States
@mmckenna assuming I use my soon to arrive nanoVNA to properly tune the system, is there a downside to having the spring in the system?

No, not really. Might allow a bit more flex that without it, which can result in some flutter in the signal if you are driving along well above highway speeds.

I have a spring on the base of a 1/2 wave VHF antenna on a Polaris Ranger, and it's taken some healthy tree branches without any issues. It's a good option to have.
 

mrweather

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,313
Theoretically, adding a spring will make the antenna a little more broad banded, but in practice I don't know if the effect is noticeable.
 
Top