PRO 97 question

Status
Not open for further replies.

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
If you're starting DSD+ from the command line, use this:

DSDPlus.EXE -f1 (then press Enter to start it)

That puts DSD+ in a discrete decoding mode where it only looks for and decodes P25 Phase I data streams which can make it work somewhat better than having it listen for any and all formats and then decipher what format it is then kick in the decoding.

The Source Audio display there appears to be getting something but not enough to work with so far. Restart DSD+ using that command above and the -f1 switch, then go into the Recording mixer again, get into the Mic input levels and see if adjusting them up a bit helps. I can't say for sure what you're getting is the proper signal at all from that screenshot, but what you're looking for will obviously be some sort of traffic (even if it's just data and not anything that would decode to a voice) that provides a signal on the DSD+ command line window at the top where that line of hyphens is. That works like a signal strength meter of sorts and as long as it's giving you a reading from about 40 to 70 (median on the entire scale) it should be enough of a signal for DSD+ to work with.

It seems complicated on the surface but in the long run as I mentioned in the last post it's a signal chain:

Signal in the air > pulled in by your Pro-97 > fed by discriminator tap to the computer > with appropriate input levels then passed to DSD+ > decoded for content to provide audible speech > to the computer's speakers = you hear what's going on but because it's a trunked system your current setup means you'll miss out on comms when they hop trunks/channels.

With an RTL stick aka a "cheap USB TV tuner" you can buy for $10-20 that then gets added into this chain as follows and functions (and I'll highlight what the RTL stick adds):

Signal in the air > pulled in by your Pro-97 > fed by discriminator tap to the computer > with appropriate input levels then passed to Unitrunker for (Signal receiver) decoding and following the trunking properly > Unitrunker then can be used to control the RTL stick as the actual voice channel tuner which means it'll follow conversations if you hold on a specific talkgroup > that digital signal received by the RTL stick is fed from Unitrunker (Voice receiver) to DSD+ > decoded for content to provide audible speech > to the computer's speakers = you hear what's going on properly with trunk tracking working as it should be done

That makes sense, right? :D

Seems complicated on the surface, but relatively easy to actually make a reality. You've obviously got two of the tools needed: a tapped scanner and a computer running the software (Unitrunker, like DSD+, is also free) - the third tool to give you an actual P25 Phase I monitoring setup would be one of those RTL sticks at fairly minimal pricing and voila, that Tallahassee/Leon system then becomes something you can actually monitor again without having to put out a pocket of cash to make a reality.

I don't even own a physical scanner anymore (think I mentioned that already, can't even remember) and all I own are two of those RTL sticks, combined cost was $20 + shipping, and some home made antennas I've created (an 800 MHz 1/4 wave ground plane from coat hangers and an SO-239 chassis mount as well as some duckies including the Radio Shack 800 MHz because it's just awesome, period). I use those two sticks for all my monitoring of everything in the Las Vegas metropolitan area with my laptop (has a docking station that adds 5 more USB ports on top of the 4 my laptop already has) and I use the RTL sticks with 8 foot USB extension cords to keep them away from the computer itself (RFI protection, as well as having ferrite cores wrapped around the USB cords too).

All in all the whole thing works remarkably well, surprisingly. I only have two P25 systems here in my area that are active and interesting to me: one is Nellis AFB, and the other is a newer changeover system (they're moving from analog to P25) - in about 2 mins time I created a new "system" using Unitrunker and DSD+ that lets me monitor the second P25 system. It doesn't have any of the talkgroup info programmed in yet because I literally just created it. One RTL stick is a Signal receiver for Unitrunker meaning it's used strictly for the control channel of the P25 system and tunes only that frequency. The second stick is the Voice receiver and it receives instructions from Unitrunker on which frequency to tune in when a new transmission occurs - when that happens, the audio data is passed on to DSD+ using a virtual audio cable (ain't gonna get into that now) in the Windows audio mixer where DSD+ decodes it and provides me with the actual decoded speech audio.

2 mins, and it works. Screenshot:



It ain't perfect, it doesn't sound as good as it can (DSD+ offers options for tuning the decodes to clean them up and provide better audio quality), and it's a mish-mash of applications to make it happen but it actually does work and in some respects I have more capabilities available to me than any digital scanner can at this point regardless of the price. It's not for everyone, no, but it's fun to experiment and try new things.

Having a handheld is just the beginning these days, adding computers, SDR hardware and software, and it becomes practically a new hobby all by itself. :)

EDIT:
With respect to the antennas, I would say use the Pro-97's signal strength meter to give you an idea of which one provides the best signal on the primary control channel frequency of 857.46250 (that would be one you will eventually lock out since it's just a data stream 24/7). I would suspect that the adjustable whip antenna will work the best - the stock rubber ducky is better for VHF and UHF stuff (in the 118 to 512 MHz range) - the Diamond antenna there (at least that's what it appears to be, the RH-C77A which I have myself) is designed for dual band operation in the 144 MHz and 440 MHz bands but it does work remarkably well as a wideband receive antenna as well, mostly in the same range the stock ducky has but it will actually get 700-900 MHz content too, just not as sensitive in those bands.

The adjustable whip antenna could be tuned to roughly 855 MHz (right in the middle of the 800 MHz public service range) and work the best overall but you'll have to figure out how to adjust it to the proper length. I can tell you that a half wave 855 MHz antenna would be about 6.5" long but that whip you have (looks like the traditional Radio Shack adjustable whip they've been selling since the 1980s) has the loading coil which means it affects how the tuning works. Best suggestion: try using the adjustable whip antenna and setting it for about 7" long, check the signal strength then adjust it longer and shorter and see if things change in terms of the signal reception.

Placing is also going to affect your reception meaning where you're located in your home at the time. If you're using all this stuff with the computer (I don't know if you have a desktop or a laptop) trying to get the antenna situated near a window in the direction of the tower - the actual tower information is here: http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?siteId=16149 so you can look at the map there and zoom in and find out exactly where those signals are coming from in your area, down to basically the street intersection and then adjust things accordingly to get the best line-of-sight type signal you can.

Hope this helps...

EDIT 2:
Can't believe I missed this but but but... use that primary control channel as your test frequency: when you tune that frequency in and pipe that signal through the tap to DSD+ it's going to decode it as a P25 Phase I control channel because that's what it actually is. You won't hear any voice coming out at any time since it's a pure data stream but at least you'll be able to use that as your "test bed" signal to ensure that DSD+ is getting one at all and then adjust the levels accordingly. All you should see will be something like this when DSD+ is decoding a P25 Phase I control channel:

P25_CC_Data.png


That's all you should see, endlessly scrolling by line after line after line. You may notice occasional changes to the NAC depending on the system and how it handles things, but typically it'll just stay on the same NAC over and over. The control channel will provide you with a fairly rock solid signal that doesn't deviate much at all and is a reliable source to get DSD+ working properly. If and when that happens you can then lock out the CC frequency and start tuning the other 43 that appear to be in use for that system and sooner or later you'll start hearing tidbits of voices, hopefully.
 
Last edited:

incarceration

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
51
Yeah it's still in the same condition of needing to be programmed; like i said before i totally forgot how to program this 97 haha, I will have to mess with it tomorrow or something because I was playing with it while reading a little manual i found, that i remember using before, and it wasn't coming back to me.
 

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
iirc since it's a GRE-made device it's fairly easy to do. When it's in Scan mode pressing the 0-9 keys individually will turn on or turn off the banks (as noted by the 1-10 bank indicators at the top of the display). Find one that has nothing in it, and then you start programming it with frequencies one at a time by using MAN (channel number) then PGM (to program), enter the frequency itself then Enter and that programs that specific channel/memory, hit PGM again and it'll move to the next channel/memory, enter the frequency, press Enter, repeat till you're done.

I might be wrong on that, I got rid of my Pro-97 many years ago so that's off the top of my head. If you need the really easy to understand instructions this is the solution:

Easier to Read Pro-97/2055 Scanner Manual

Obviously the banks hold 100 channels so, Bank 1 is channel 1 to 100, Bank 2 is 101 to 200, etc. So MAN 101 Enter gets you the first channel of Bank 2, etc. You'll figure it out. :D
 

incarceration

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
51
iirc since it's a GRE-made device it's fairly easy to do. When it's in Scan mode pressing the 0-9 keys individually will turn on or turn off the banks (as noted by the 1-10 bank indicators at the top of the display). Find one that has nothing in it, and then you start programming it with frequencies one at a time by using MAN (channel number) then PGM (to program), enter the frequency itself then Enter and that programs that specific channel/memory, hit PGM again and it'll move to the next channel/memory, enter the frequency, press Enter, repeat till you're done.

I might be wrong on that, I got rid of my Pro-97 many years ago so that's off the top of my head. If you need the really easy to understand instructions this is the solution:

Easier to Read Pro-97/2055 Scanner Manual

Obviously the banks hold 100 channels so, Bank 1 is channel 1 to 100, Bank 2 is 101 to 200, etc. So MAN 101 Enter gets you the first channel of Bank 2, etc. You'll figure it out. :D

Alright, so I got all of them programmed in, I programmed the C channel first, within the bank, then the A (blue) after it, then all of the others, I did sequentially.

These are different results I'm getting, which is mostly sounds, that sound like they should be in the movie Transformers haha
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 166
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 156
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 173

incarceration

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
51
So far I heard 1 quick conversation when i first finished doing all of the programming. since then, all i'm getting is a bunch of stuff like the last photo that I keep using LOCKOUT on so it doesn't come back (i'm assuming it's encrypted which this can't decrypt?

Everything else you suggested to do, I've done, so the next step, beyond getting some actual conversation going, would be that RTL stick I guess?
 

Attachments

  • somuchencryption.jpg
    somuchencryption.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 216
Last edited:

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
Here's a tip: post your screenshots where I post mine, at postimage.org and then select the first link they provide for forum thumbnails. When you attach them to posts here they end up being small and blurry and I can't make out some of the specific details in the text. If you use postimage.org, you just copy/paste the link they provide for thumbnails right into the post and it'll provide me (or anyone reading this because other people might be learning from this thread too) with the ability to see the full size images by clicking the thumbnails.

For the most part, yes, because monitoring a trunked P25 system with just what you've got is nearly impossible - as you've seen, you'll be bouncing around not able to follow the trunks or hold on talkgroups like an actual physical trunk tracking scanner can do. The RTL stick added into the system gives you two tuners to work with: one to dedicate to the control channel for Unitrunker to decode it and provide the info for the RTL stick to tune in the voice channels when required and also to pass the signal to DSD+ to decode to speech output.

As for encryption, there does seem to be to be some of that happening on that system but it is entirely possible that DSD+ isn't getting a clean enough signal to differentiate them. On the command prompt window where you see the "e:" followed by a string of random characters doesn't mean it's encrypted it means errors and by the looks of it some pretty severe ones happening and I think it's because of the signal being too low for it to work with. The reason I say that is because of the last picture you shared: if you look at the Mic input level meter (on the Recording mixer) it's showing barely one single bar of audio volume there, and if you look at the actual DSD+ Source Audio window (the blue one) that too shows quite a low signal - mind you I'm not talking about the radio signal that the Pro-97 is receiving, I'm talking about the signal being passed to DSD+ in terms of the audio volume.

Open up the Recording mixer again, then double-click on the Mic input you have for default device, and on the Levels tab take a look at that and see if you can adjust it but don't enable the boost feature. If you've got it to 100% already then what I'd suggest is lower the main level to 50% and then raise the boost to 10%. If however the mic input isn't at 100% then somewhere in there you'll have to figure out a proper balance between that main level and adding boost - the boost slider offers 10, 20, and 30% but don't use 30% ever 'cause that'll just destroy what you're working with before it ever gets to DSD+ at all.

There's one good thing about the situation so far: it's working, for the most part, as you have heard something so far including at least some intelligible speech output for a few seconds I think. I look at that last pic and see it showing Talkgroup ID 1 and according to the current info for that Tallahassee/Leon P25 system, there's no such talkgroup in use so a again it leads me to go back to it being not "loud enough" for DSD+ to decode properly.

I think at this point - since we know it's working to some degrees - it's a matter of fine tuning everything from start to finish and playing around with it somewhat. When I first started using my RTL sticks it was trial and error to figure it out, again and again, and I wiped out the software I used several times before there was this moment when it all worked, an "AHA!" thing and from that point on it was never difficult again from that point on. I know I'm wordy - I prefer to over-explain things with excessive details so that people can't come back later on with the "HEY YOU DIDN'T TELL ME THAT..." type responses which I can't stand. :)

But the fact that through all this typing that I've done and screenshots I've taken and you following my excessive instructions with redundancy built in for good measure you actually got it working even if it's just the start so congrats to you on that aspect. You're now partially capable of monitoring a system that only hours ago was totally out of reach of you and that Pro-97 scanner but, you're not there just yet.

Again (here's that redundancy at work) I don't think the system you're trying to monitor is encrypted to such degrees - if it was the Talahassee/Leon P25 info in the RR database would show the letter "E" in the Mode column. Here's the entire system of talkgroups in ascending order by TGIDs:

Tallahassee / Leon County (Project 25) Trunking System, Tallahassee , Florida - Scanner Frequencies

and as you can plainly see they're all D for Digital, E would be listed for encrypted. Now, having said that I'm going on the presumption that the information presented there is accurate and current because it's possible that the database information is out of date or simply inaccurate. The admins of that system could have 'flipped the switch" and enabled encryption system wide but I highly doubt it. I believe it's just an issue of DSD+ simply not getting enough signal (again, that means volume level at this point) to provide a decent decode.

Here's one way you can test things: stop using DSD+ and turn up the volume on the Pro-97 as you're scanning those 43 frequencies (since you have the 4 control channels locked out). Listen to whenever it locks on a transmission and if it sounds like what a P25 Phase I data stream sounds like, on any of the frequencies, then at least we know the scanner is working properly. You just need to make sure that the signals it's getting on those frequencies isn't plagued by a lot of crackling and background static which will destroy the signal getting to DSD+ first and foremost. If they always sound nice and clear and the signal strength meter on the Pro-97 shows a good signal then we rule out the scanner as the problem.

Then it becomes an issue of getting that discriminator tap signal to the computer which apparently is working too, so then the problem is: is the level loud enough for DSD+ to work with it effectively and not consider it as just noise which results in the e: errors so consistently.

Baby steps, baby steps... :D

EDIT:
If you need to hear what you should be looking for, you'll find P25 Phase I control channel and voice channel (including trunked voice channels too) samples on the following two pages (you can hit Control+F to open search for them on the pages instead of scrolling around looking for them specifically). They're also great sources of samples of digital modes and other types of radio transmissions as well:

http://www.w2sjw.com/radio_sounds.html

http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/
 
Last edited:

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
And because I missed it earlier, there does appear to be some encryption in use as noted on the RR database page with that little tidbit that says "A number of agencies are reported to be using ADP encryption on this system" where ADP means Advanced Digital Privacy but I'm not even sure about that technology overall. Seems there's been some issues with it based on the little research I just did but I have to wonder why the RR database entries for that system don't show encryption in use aside from that little note. The ADP encryption thing doesn't seem to be part of the actual P25 specifications, it's some "Frankenstein" thing added in later on as a way to save money for P25 deployment, you can read more about the situation here:

http://urgentcomm.com/networks-amp-...w-cost-adp-encryption-could-be-pricy-decision

and even a thread here discussing that article:

http://forums.radioreference.com/co...cost-adp-encryption-could-pricy-decision.html

One suggestion: drop over to the Florida subforum and post a question about that system, perhaps there's someone else in your area that has more experience monitoring (or attempting to monitor it given the possible encryption) it over the past 2 years or so that the P25 system has been in operation.

I did just do a search there in that subforum and I see where you posted about 2+ years ago asking similar questions about that same system when it was just switching over to P25, perhaps now that it's been in place for some time there could be someone with more info as I just stated, it can't hurt to ask.

The last pic you just posted shows what I would consider to be a fairly solid signal on the Source Audio window, and again I see the Event Log showing a TGID that IS in the RR database info: it's 81 so that's the Talahassee Fire Dept Dispatch Ch 1 so hurray, it works.

But unfortunately it could be encrypted. :(

Two steps forward, one step back it seems. DSD+ isn't consistently saying it's muting encrypted voice so, I can't really be sure what's going on at the moment but you're definitely getting a good signal to DSD+ now, that much is obvious: it has a decent Source Audio display and it got the proper TGID and even a RID (Radio ID) as well.

Not sure what else to do at this point, it appears you'd done everything possible so unless or until someone confirms that yep, it's a fully encrypted system there's not much else that can be done. :(
 

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
Wow, I've never heard anything like that but I'm going to guess the scanner was hopping frequencies every time I heard a tiny gap in the data stream, maybe? It apparently is a system with a lot of use, even at 3AM on a Sunday morning (you're Eastern time so, that should be about right, Pacific time here in Las Vegas so it just hit midnight a few minutes ago). At about the 45 second mark it starts breaking up pretty severely so I can't tell if it's background static because the actual radio signal is just not very clear or what.

The plot thickens. :D
 

incarceration

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
51
I just made a thread in the FL section, so we'll see what comes up!

Even if this turns out bogus cause of encryption, it was still fun! Maybe I can use it in some other areas or something.

We'll see what happens once some responses start coming through.

Thanks again
 

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
Ah, well, that really sucks. I know here in Las Vegas the LV Metro Police Dept switched over to a P25 Phase II system about a year ago (the rollout took some time replacing the crappy Harris OpenSky system that was a miserable failure) and the big concern for many listeners including myself was whether or not they would encrypt it all and so far they have left only the actual dispatch channels open but everything else is encrypted. So while it's not all in the open anymore at least people can listen in on the dispatch channels (11 command areas) and a few others related to the city services.

It's better than absolutely nothing at all, of course. Sorry if this whole Saturday evening/Sunday morning exercise proves fruitless in the long run in terms of monitoring what you were hoping to monitor aside from you now having a tapped scanner and having learned a few things about the hobby with my incessant rambling. ;)
 

incarceration

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
51
Ah, well, that really sucks. I know here in Las Vegas the LV Metro Police Dept switched over to a P25 Phase II system about a year ago (the rollout took some time replacing the crappy Harris OpenSky system that was a miserable failure) and the big concern for many listeners including myself was whether or not they would encrypt it all and so far they have left only the actual dispatch channels open but everything else is encrypted. So while it's not all in the open anymore at least people can listen in on the dispatch channels (11 command areas) and a few others related to the city services.

It's better than absolutely nothing at all, of course. Sorry if this whole Saturday evening/Sunday morning exercise proves fruitless in the long run in terms of monitoring what you were hoping to monitor aside from you now having a tapped scanner and having learned a few things about the hobby with my incessant rambling. ;)

haha no problem! it was still cool; got to whip out the soldering iron.
did tapping my scanner increase or decrease its value at all?
 

br0adband

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
1,567
Location
Springfield MO
Eh, most people not in the hobby would consider it devalued now if the tap remains in place and you try to sell it in that condition but I suppose it depends on who might be interested in it. Since it's an analog scanner by design, in your area that means the one thing that most people interested in owning a scanner want to do - monitor local police/law enforcement and fire/emergency services for the "action" as it happens - doesn't exist so, it's just another mostly obsolete piece of technology in that regard from their point of view.

It's still useful, still valuable, and even I could make use of it but where I live there's a ton of digital comms happening these days. Only the two P25 Phase I systems, with one P25 Phase II, but a whole bunch of DMR/TRBO and NXDN systems and more converting to them from analog systems all the time.

Either way, whether you keep it or not, at this point if you remain in the Tallahassee area at least you know (until someone says otherwise) that spending several hundred bucks on a proper digital scanner won't make a bit of difference either so, if nothing else positive comes from this thread then at least you can say I saved you a few hundred bucks I suppose. :p
 

incarceration

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
51
Eh, most people not in the hobby would consider it devalued now if the tap remains in place and you try to sell it in that condition but I suppose it depends on who might be interested in it. Since it's an analog scanner by design, in your area that means the one thing that most people interested in owning a scanner want to do - monitor local police/law enforcement and fire/emergency services for the "action" as it happens - doesn't exist so, it's just another mostly obsolete piece of technology in that regard from their point of view.

It's still useful, still valuable, and even I could make use of it but where I live there's a ton of digital comms happening these days. Only the two P25 Phase I systems, with one P25 Phase II, but a whole bunch of DMR/TRBO and NXDN systems and more converting to them from analog systems all the time.

Either way, whether you keep it or not, at this point if you remain in the Tallahassee area at least you know (until someone says otherwise) that spending several hundred bucks on a proper digital scanner won't make a bit of difference either so, if nothing else positive comes from this thread then at least you can say I saved you a few hundred bucks I suppose. :p

yes, you did! and thanks! was a cool little mod too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top